The rise of populism presents a challenge to liberal democracy in various countries. This article questions how populist attitudes affect the democratic preferences of the electorate. Using representative survey data fielded from Turkey in 2019, we first tested the effect of populist attitudes on illiberal democratic attitudes. The results show the negative impact of populism on support for illiberal democratic attitudes. Next, we analyzed which dimension of populism correlates with illiberal democratic preferences. Our results pointed to the negative influence of the Manichean outlook on preferences concerning democracy. Contrary to expectations, as anti-elitist and people-centric attitudes increase, support for illiberal democracy decreases. Hence, the relative emphasis on different dimensions of populism is likely to shape the net balance of its influence on democracy. Electoral alliance preferences also shape democracy preferences. The ruling People’s Alliance voters are more supportive of illiberal democracy than the opposition blocs and parties.
AbtsKoenRummensStefan (2007) Populism Versus Democracy. Political Studies55(2): 405–424.
2.
AkkermanAgnesMuddeCasZasloveAndrej (2014) How Populist are the People? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies47(9): 1324–1353.
3.
AytaçS ErdemElçiEzgi (2019) Populism in Turkey. In StockemerDaniel (ed.) Populism Around the World. Cham: Springer, 89–108.
4.
AytaçS ErdemÇarkoğluAliElçiEzgi (2021) Partisanship, Elite Messages, and Support for Populism in Power. European Political Science Review13(1): 23–39.
5.
BagginiJulian (2015) The Populist Threat to Pluralism. Philosophy & Social Criticism41(4–5): 403–412.
6.
BermeoNancy (2016) On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy27(1): 5–19.
7.
BetzHans-GeorgImmerfallStefan (1998) The New Politics of the Right: Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
CanovanMargaret (1981) Populism. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
9.
CanovanMargaret (1999) Trust the People! Populism and the two faces of populism. Political Studies47(1): 2–16.
10.
Castanho SilvaBrunoVegettiFedericoLittvayLevente (2017) The Elite is up to Something: Exploring the relation between populism and belief in conspiracy theories. Swiss Political Science Review23(4): 423–443.
11.
Castanho SilvaBrunoAndreadisIoannisAnduizaEvaBlanušaNebojšaCortiYazmin MorletDelfinoGiselaRicoGuillemRuth-LovellSaskia P.SpruytBramSteenbergenMarcoLittvayLevente (2018) Public Opinion Surveys: A new scale. In HawkinsKirk A.CarlinRyan E.LittvayLeventeRovira KaltwasserCristóbal (eds) The Ideational Approach to Populism: Theory, Method & Analysis. London: Routledge, 150–177.
12.
Castanho SilvaBrunoJungkunzSebastianHelblingMarcLittvayLevente (2020) An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales. Political Research Quarterly73(2): 409–424.
13.
ChristofisNikos (ed.) (2020) Erdoğan’s ‘New’ Turkey: Attempted coup d’état and the acceleration of political crisis. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
ChuYun-HanHuangKai-PingLagosMartaMattesRobert (2020) A Lost Decade for Third-Wave Democracies?Journal of Democracy31(2): 166–181.
15.
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org) (2021) CSES Module 5 Third Advance Release (dataset and documentation). 20July2021 version. DOI: 10.7804/cses.module5.2021-07-20.
ElçiEzgi (2019) The Rise of Populism in Turkey: A content analysis. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies19(3): 387–408.
18.
ErişenCengizGuidiMattiaMartiniSergioToprakkıranSelinIserniaPierangeloLittvayLevente (2021) Psychological Correlates of Populist Attitudes. Political Psychology42(S1): 149–171.
19.
EsenBerkGumuscuSebnem (2021) Why did Turkish Democracy Collapse? A political economy account of AKP’s authoritarianism. Party Politics27(6): 1075–1091.
GalstonWilliam A (2018) The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy. Journal of Democracy29(2): 5–19.
23.
GülalpHaldun (2010) Islam and Democracy: Is Turkey an exception or a role model? In AhmadAkbar SSonnTamara (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Islamic Studies. London: SAGE, 240–261.
24.
HawkinsKirk A (2009) Is Chávez Populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies42(8): 1040–1067.
25.
HawkinsKirk A (2010) Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
InglehartRonald (2003) How Solid is Mass Support for Democracy—and How can we Measure it?PS: Political Science & Politics36(1): 51–57.
27.
JungkunzSebastianFaheyRobert AHinoAiro (2021) How Populist Attitudes Scales Fail to Capture Support for Populists in Power. PLoS One16(12): e0261658.
28.
KalaycıoğluE (2012) Kulturkampf in Turkey: The constitutional referendum of12September2010. South European Society and Politics17(1): 1–22.
29.
KaygusuzÖzlem (2018) Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Regime Security in Turkey: Moving to an ‘exceptional state’ under AKP. South European Society and Politics23(2): 281–302.
30.
KirişçiKemal (2012) Can the Turkish Model be Relevant for the Arab Awakening?Confluences Méditerranée4: 43–57.
31.
LipsetSeymour Martin (1959) Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review53(1): 69–105.
LührmannAnnaLindbergStaffan I (2019) A Third Wave of Autocratization is Here: What is New About it?Democratization26(7): 1095–1113. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029
34.
MaukMarlene (2020) Citizen Support for Democratic and Autocratic Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
MerkelWolfgang (2004) Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization11(5): 33–58. DOI: 10.1080/13510340412331304598.
36.
MouffeChantal (2018) For a Left Populism. London: Verso Books.
37.
MuddeCas (2004) The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
38.
MuddeCas (2021) Populism in Europe: An illiberal democratic response to undemocratic liberalism (The Government and Opposition/Leonard Schapiro Lecture 2019). Government and Opposition56(4): 577–597.
39.
MuddeCasRovira KaltwasserCristóbal (2013) Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latın America. Government and Opposition48(2): 147–174.
40.
MuddeCasRovira KaltwasserCristóbal (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
MuddeCasRovira KaltwasserCristóbal (2018) Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies51(13): 1667–1693.
42.
MüllerJan-Werner (2016) What is Populism?Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
43.
O’DonnellGuillermo A (1994) Delegative Democracy?Journal of Democracy5(1): 55–69.
44.
ÖnişZiya (2015) Monopolising the Centre: The AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy. International Spectator50(2): 22–41.
PappasTakis S (2014) Populist Democracies: Post-authoritarian Greece and post-communist Hungary. Government and Opposition49(1): 1–23.
47.
PasquinoGianfranco (2008) Populism and Democracy. In AlbertazziDanieleMcDonnellDuncan (eds) Twenty-First Century Populism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 15–29.
48.
RogenhoferJulius M (2018) Antidemocratic Populism in Turkey After the July 2016 Coup Attempt. Populism1(2): 116–145.
49.
Rovira KaltwasserCristóbal (2012) The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy. Democratization19(2): 184–208.
50.
RummensStefan (2017) Populism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy. In Rovira KaltwasserCristóbalTaggartPaulEspejoPaulina OchoaOstiguyPierre (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 554–570.
51.
Ruth-LovellSaskia PLührmannAnnaGrahnSandra (2019) Democracy and Populism: Testing a Contentious Relationship. V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series, 91.
52.
SalterLeon (2016) Populism as a Fantasmatic Rupture in the Post-Political Order: Integrating Laclau with Glynos and Stavrakakis. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online11(2): 116–132.
53.
SchmittCarl (2008) The Concept of the Political: Expanded edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
SelçukOrçunHekimciDilara (2020) The Rise of the Democracy–Authoritarianism Cleavage and Opposition Coordination in Turkey (2014–2019). Democratization27(8): 1496–1514.
55.
SingerMatthew (2018) Delegating Away Democracy: How good representation and policy successes can undermine democratic legitimacy. Comparative Political Studies51(13): 1754–1788.
56.
SomerMurat (2019) Turkey: The slippery slope from reformist to revolutionary polarization and democratic breakdown. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science681(1): 42–61.
57.
SözenYunus (2020) Studying Autocratization in Turkey: Political institutions, populism, and neoliberalism. New Perspectives on Turkey63: 209–235.
58.
SpruytBramKeppensGilVan DroogenbroeckFilip (2016) Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to it?Political Research Quarterly69(2): 335–346.
59.
SvolikMilan W (2019) Polarization Versus Democracy. Journal of Democracy30(3): 20–32
60.
ToprakBinnaz (2005) Islam and Democracy in Turkey. Turkish Studies6(2): 167–186.
61.
WuttkeAlexanderSchimpfChristianSchoenHarald (2020) When the Whole is Greater Than the Sum of its Parts: On the conceptualization and measurement of populist attitudes and other multidimensional constructs. American Political Science Review114(2): 356–374.
62.
YıldırımKeremBaruhLemiÇarkoğluAli (2021) Dynamics of Campaign Reporting and Press-Party Parallelism: Rise of competitive authoritarianism and the media system in Turkey. Political Communication38(3):326–349.
63.
ZakariaFareed (1997) The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs76: 22–43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
