The present investigation engages in the debate on populism from a demand/acceptance perspective by providing examinations and explanations within the Chinese context. It clarifies the heterogeneity of China’s populism, separating rights-oriented populism, which shares the element of anti-elitism with the populism found in most European nations, from responsibility-oriented populism, which has ideological roots in China’s specific socio-political contexts. The study finds responsibility-oriented populism to be predominant in China (occupying 76.92% of the populist sample), with rights-oriented populism only representing 18.04% of the populist respondents. Using these results, we examine associations between each type of populism and a series of political ideations. Statistics suggest that China’s rights-oriented populism is negatively correlated with system justification and national identification. In contrast, stronger responsibility-oriented populism associates with higher system justification, greater national identification, more satisfaction with life, and higher right-wing authoritarianism. Finally, implications for research on populism and on China’s public opinion are discussed.
AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrombackJesperDe VreeseClaes (eds) (2016) Populist Political Communication in Europe.
New York:
Routledge.
2.
AltemeyerBob (1988) Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
3.
Birney, Mayling, Pierre F Landry and Jie Yan (2008) Accurately inferring meaning from incomplete and insincere responses to sensitive survey questions in authoritarian regimes. Paper presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
4.
BrandenbergerDavid (2010)
Stalin’s Populism and the Accidental Creation of Russian National Identity. Nationalities Papers38(5): 723–739.
5.
CallahanWilliam A (2015)
Identity and Security in China: The Negative Soft Power of the China Dream. Politics35(3–4): 216–229.
6.
CsigóPeterMerkovityNorbert (2016)
Home of Empty Populism. In TorilAalbergEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrombackJesperDe VreeseClaes (eds) Populist Political Communication in Europe.
New York, NY:
Routledge, 299–310.
7.
DienerEDEmmonsRobert ALarsenRandy JGriffinSharon (1985)
The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment49(1): 71–75.
8.
DuckittJohnSibleyChris G (2007)
Right Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation and the Dimensions of Generalized Prejudice. European Journal of Personality: Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology21(2): 113–130.
9.
EsareyAshleyStockmannDanielaZhangJie (2017)
Support for Propaganda: Chinese perceptions of public service advertising. Journal of Contemporary China26(103): 101–117.
10.
FuchsChristian (2018) Digital Demagogue: Authoritarian Capitalism in the Age of Trump and Twitter.
London:
Pluto Press.
11.
HallStuart (1980)
Popular-democratic versus Authoritarian Populism: Two Ways of Taking Democracy Seriously. In AlanHunt (ed.) Marxism and Democracy.
London:
Lawrence and Wishart, 157–187.
12.
HameleersMichaelBosLindade VreeseClaes H (2018)
Selective Exposure to Populist Communication: How attitudinal congruence drives the effects of populist attributions of blame. Journal of Communication68(1): 51–74.
13.
HuangRongguiYipNgai-ming (2012)
Internet and Activism in Urban China: A case study of protests in Xiamen and Panyu. Journal of Comparative Asian Development11(2): 201–223.
14.
HuangShaorong (2016)
Maintain the Flesh-and-Blood Ties with the People: Xi Jinping’s rhetoric on mass line. China Media Research12(4): 59–67.
15.
HuddyLenoieKhatibNadia (2007)
American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement. American Journal of Political Science51(1): 63–77.
16.
InglehartRonaldNorrisPippa (2016)
Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series.
17.
JagersJanWalgraveStefaan (2007)
Populism as Political Communication Style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 319–345.
18.
KayAaron CJostJohn T (2003)
Complementary Justice: Effects of ‘poor but happy’ and ‘poor but honest’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85(5): 823–837.
19.
KingGaryPanJenniferRobertsMargaret E (2013)
How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review107(2): 326–343.
20.
KorolevAlexander (2017)
De-ideologized Mass Line, Regime Responsiveness, and State-Society Relations. China Review17(2): 7–36.
21.
LeiXuchuanLuJie (2017)
Revisiting Political Wariness in China’s Public Opinion Surveys: Experimental evidence on responses to politically sensitive questions. Journal of Contemporary China26(104): 213–232.
22.
MamonovaNatalia (2019)
Understanding the Silent Majority in Authoritarian Populism: What can we learn from popular support for Putin in rural Russia?. The Journal of Peasant Studies46(3): 561–585.
23.
MeisnerMaurice (1971)
Leninism and Maoism: Some populist perspectives in Marxism-Leninism in China. The China Quarterly45: 2–36.
24.
MuddeCas (2004)
The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
25.
MuddeCasRovira KaltwasserCristóbal (2013)
Populism. In Michael Freeden, Lyman Tower SargentMarc Stears (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies.
New York:
Oxford University Press, 494–512.
26.
MüllerPhilippSchemerChristianWettsteinMartinSchulzAnneWirzDominique SEngesserSvenWirthWerner (2017)
The Polarizing Impact of News Coverage on Populist Attitudes in The Public: Evidence from a panel study in four European democracies. Journal of Communication67(6): 968–992.
27.
OlikerOlga (2017)
Putinism, Populism and the Defence of Liberal Democracy. Survival59(1): 7–24.
28.
SchulzAnneMüllerPhilippSchemerChristianStefanie WirzDominiqueWettsteinMartinWirthWerner (2017)
Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research30(2): 316–326.
29.
SchramStuart (1989) The Thought of Mao Tse-Tung.
London:
Cambridge University Press.
30.
ShiTianjianLouDiqing (2010)
Subjective Evaluation of Changes in Civil Liberties and Political Rights in China. Journal of Contemporary China19(63): 175–199.
31.
SuiterJane (2016)
The Rise of Populism on the Left and among Independents. In AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrombackJesperDe VreeseClaes (eds) Populist Political Communication in Europe.
New York, NY:
Routledge, 127–136.
32.
TaiZixue (2015)
Networked Resistance: Digital populism, online activism, and mass dissent in china. Popular Communication13(2): 120–131.
33.
TangWenfang (2016) Populist Authoritarianism: Chinese Political Culture and Regime Sustainability.
London, UK:
Oxford University Press.
34.
TilzeyMark (2019)
Authoritarian Populism and Neo-Extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: The unresolved agrarian question and the prospects for food sovereignty as counter-hegemony. The Journal of Peasant Studies46(3): 626–652.
35.
TongJinrong (2015)
The Formation of an Agonistic Public Sphere: Emotions, the Internet and news media in China. China Information29(3): 333–351.
36.
TownsendJames R (1977)
Chinese Populism and the Legacy of Mao Tse-Tung. Asian Survey17(11): 1003–1015.
37.
YuHaiyang (2014)
Glorious Memories of Imperial China and the Rise of Chinese Populist Nationalism. Journal of Contemporary China23(90): 1174–1187.
38.
ZhaiYida (2018)
Traditional Values and Political Trust in China. Journal of Asian and African Studies53(3): 350–365.
