This study seeks to explain why, to what extent, and in what ways ethnic party representatives remain active on the parliamentary floor when the political representation of minority groups takes place alongside ethnic conflict. To test hypotheses related to these questions, we utilize an original dataset of 14,000 parliamentary questions and speeches and background characteristics of 372 representatives in Turkey. The dataset spans many episodes of the Kurdish conflict over six legislative terms (1991–2015). Our empirical analyses show that the parliamentary behavior of ethnic party representatives is directly linked to the intensity of violence between the state and the insurgent group. We specifically demonstrate that ethnic party representatives, compared to other representatives in conflict-ridden provinces, are more active on the floor and focus more heavily on civil rights and identity issues. These findings contribute to our understanding of various linkages between identity and the substantive representation of minorities during violent conflict.
AlonsoSoniaRuiz-RufinoRuben (2007) Political Representation and Ethnic Conflict in New Democracies. European Journal of Political Research46(2): 237–267.
2.
AydemirNerminVliegenthartRens (2015) Minority Representatives in the Netherlands: Supporting, silencing or suppressing?Parliamentary Affairs69(1): 73–92.
3.
AydinAysegulEmrenceCem (2015) Zones of Rebellion: Kurdish Insurgents and the Turkish State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
BäckHannaDebusMarc (2016) Political Parties, Parliaments and Legislative Speechmaking. London: Palgrave.
5.
ChandraKanhan (2011) What Is an Ethnic Party?Party Politics17(2): 151–169.
6.
CiftciSabriYildirimTevfik Murat (2019) Hiding Behind the Party Brand or Currying Favor with Constituents: Why do representatives engage in different types of constituency-oriented behavior?Party Politics25(3): 369–381.
7.
CiftciSabriForrestWalterTekinYusuf (2008) Committee Assignments in a Nascent Party System: The case of the Turkish grand national assembly. International Political Science Review29(3): 303–324.
8.
CoakleyJohn (2003) Ethnic Conflict and its Resolution: The Northern Ireland model. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics9(3): 25–53.
9.
EggersAndrew CSpirlingArthur (2014) Electoral Security as a Determinant of Legislator activity, 1832–1918: New data and methods for analyzing British political development. Legislative Studies Quarterly39(4): 593–620.
10.
GhaiYash (2000) Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competing Claims in Multiethnic States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Green-PedersenChristoffer (2010) Bringing Parties into Parliament: The development of parliamentary activities in Western Europe. Party Politics16(3): 347–369.
12.
Green-PedersenChristofferMortensenPeter B (2010) Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to it in the Danish Parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research49(2): 257–281.
13.
GuntherRichardDiamondLarry (2003) Species of Political Parties: A new typology. Party Politics9(2): 167–199.
14.
GursesMehmet (2015) Transnational Ethnic Kin and Civil War Outcomes. Political Research Quarterly68(1): 142–153.
15.
HanniMiriam (2016) Presence, Representation and Impact: How minority MPs affect policy outcomes. Legislative Studies Quarterly42(1): 97–130.
16.
HilbeJoseph M (2011) Negative Binomial Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HorowitzDonald L (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
KibrisArzu (2011) Funerals and Elections: The effects of terrorism on voting behavior in Turkey. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(2): 220–247.
19.
LijphartArend (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
LouwerseTomOtjesSimon (2016) Personalised Parliamentary Behavior without Electoral Incentives: the case of the Netherlands. West European Politics39(4): 778–799.
21.
MaltzmanForrestSigelmanLee (1996) The Politics of Talk: Unconstrained floor time in the US House of Representatives. Journal of Politics58(3): 819–830
22.
MartinShane (2011) Parliamentary Questions, the Behavior of Legislators, and the Function of Legislatures: An introduction. Journal of Legislative Studies17(3): 259–270.
23.
MayhewDavid R (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
MintaMichael D (2009) Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly34(2): 193–218.
25.
MutluServet (1996) Ethnic Kurds in Turkey: A demographic study. International Journal of Middle East Studies28(4): 517–541.
26.
PitkinHanna F (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
ProkschSven-OliverSlapinJonathan B (2012) Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech. American Journal of Political Science56(3): 520–537.
28.
RabushkaAlvinShepsleKenneth A (1972) Politics in Plural Societies. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
29.
SaalfeldThomas (2011) Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10. Journal of Legislative Studies17(3): 271–289.
30.
SaalfeldThomasBischofDaniel (2013) Minority-ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005–2011. Parliamentary Affairs66(2): 305–328.
31.
SambanisNicholasShayoMoses (2013) Social Identification and Ethnic Conflict. American Political Science Review107(2): 294–325.
32.
SchimmelfennigFrankEngertStefanKnobelHeiko (2003) Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The impact of EU democratic conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey. Journal of Common Market Studies41(3): 495–518.
33.
SearingDonald (1994) Westminster’s World: Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
ShomerYael (2009) Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority and Vote-seeking Behavior. Comparative Political Studies42(7): 945–970.
35.
ShugartMatthew Soberg (1992) Guerrillas and Elections: An institutionalist perspective on the costs of conflict and competition. International Studies Quarterly36(2): 121–152.
36.
SimmonsJoseph PNelsonLeif DSimonsohnUri (2011) False-positive Psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science22(11): 1359–1366.
37.
TezcurGunes Murat (2016) Ordinary People, Extraordinary Risks: Participation in an ethnic rebellion. American Political Science Review110(2): 247–264.
38.
TezcurGunes MuratGursesMehmet (2017) Ethnic Exclusion and Mobilization. Comparative Politics49(2): 213–234.
39.
TuranİlterİbaŞerefZarakolAyşe (2005) Inter-party Mobility in the Turkish Grand National Assembly: Curse or blessing?European Journal of Turkish Studies. Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey (3). Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/400?lang=tr
40.
WattsNicole F (1999) Allies and Enemies: Pro-Kurdish parties in Turkish politics, 1990–94. International Journal of Middle East Studies31(4): 631–656.
41.
WimmerAndreasCedermanLars-ErikMinBrian (2009) Ethnic Politics and Armed Conflict: A configurational analysis of a new global data set. American Sociological Review74(2): 316–337.
42.
YildirimTevfik Murat (2019) Politics of Constituency Representation and Legislative Ambition under the Glare of Camera Lights. Legislative Studies Quarterly. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1111/lsq.12256.
43.
YildirimTevfik MuratKocapınarGülnurEcevitYüksel Alper (2017) Staying Active and Focused? The effect of parliamentary performance on candidate renomination and promotion. Party Politics. Epub ahead of print 1 November 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1354068817740338.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
