Power-sharing may be a leading model for the inclusion of ethnic minorities in post-conflict government, but it is also considered a gender-blind approach to conflict regulation. In this article, I identify recent openings and shifts in power-sharing theory that suggest a new receptivity to the adoption of a gender perspective. Specifically, I focus on two major developments that have emerged over the last three decades – the widening of the power-sharing universe and the refinement of its institutional prescriptions – which have opened up analytical and political space for the inclusion of women in power-sharing theory. Building on these developments, I identify extant gender gaps in power-sharing theory, discuss strategies for overcoming them through the adoption of what I call least-ascriptive-most-prescriptive rules, and outline areas for future research on integrating a gender perspective into power-sharing theory and practice. While power-sharing theory may initially appear resistant to a gender intervention, I demonstrate there is new analytical space in the theory for such a venture.
BellChristine (2018) Power-Sharing, Conflict Resolution and Women: A global reappraisal. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics24(1): 13–32.
2.
BellChristineMcNichollKevin (2019) Principled Pragmatism and the ‘Inclusion Project’: Implementing a gender perspective in peace agreements. feminists@law9(1): 1–51.
3.
BrownKristianNí AoláinFionnuala (2015) Through the Looking Glass: Transitional justice futures through the lens of nationalism, feminism and transformative change. International Journal of Transitional Justice9(1): 127–149.
4.
ByrneSiobhan (2014) Troubled engagement in ethnicized conflict. International Feminist Journal of Politics16(1): 106–126.
5.
ByrneSiobhanMcCullochAllison (2012) Gender, representation, and power-sharing in post-conflict institutions. International Peacekeeping19(5): 565–580.
6.
ByrneSiobhanMcCullochAllison (2018) Is power-sharing bad for women?Nationalism and Ethnic Politics24(1): 1–12.
7.
CockburnCynthia (2014) Exit from War: Syrian women learn from the Bosnian women’s movement. Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements6(1): 342–362.
8.
CohnCarolKinsellaHelenaGibbingsSherri (2004) Women, Peace and Security Resolution 1325. International Feminist Journal of Politics6(1): 130-140.
9.
DeianaMaria-Adriana (2015) To Settle for a Gendered Peace? Spaces for feminist grassroots mobilization in Northern Ireland and Bosnia-Herzegovina. Citizenship Studies20(1): 99–114.
10.
DemetriouOlgaHadjipavlouMaria (2018) The Impact of Women’s Activism on the Peace Negotiations in Cyprus. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics24(1): 50–65.
11.
DuncansonClaire (2016) Gender and Peacebuilding. London: Polity Press.
12.
EriksonJosefinaJosefssonCecilia (2019) The Legislature as a Gendered Workplace: Exploring members of parliament’s experiences of working in the Swedish parliament. International Political Science Review40(2): 197–214.
13.
GalliganYvonne (2006) Women in Northern Ireland’s Politics: Feminising an ‘armed patriarchy’. In MarianSawerTremblayManonLindaTrimble (eds) Representing Women in Parliament. London: Routledge, 205–220.
14.
HadeniusAxelKarvovenLauri (2001) The paradox of integration in intra-state conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Politics13(1): 35–51.
15.
HagenJamie J (2016) Queering Women, Peace and Security. International Affairs92(2): 313–332.
16.
HartzellCaroline (2015) Power-sharing and women’s political rights after civil war. Paper presented at the Workshop on Power-Sharing and the Women, Peace and Security Agenda, Belfast, UK, 6-7 November.
17.
HartzellCarolineHoddieMatthew (2003) Institutionalizing Peace: Power sharing and post-civil war conflict management. American Journal of Political Science47(2): 318–332
18.
HayesBernadette CMcAllisterIan (2012) Gender and consociational power-sharing in Northern Ireland. International Political Science Review34(2): 123–139.
19.
HayesBernadette CNagleJohn (2018) Ethnonationalism and attitudes towards same-sex marriage and abortion in Northern Ireland. International Political Science Review. Epub ahead of print 5 July 2018. doi: 10.1177/0192512118775832.
20.
JacobsonRuth (2012) Women ‘After’ Wars. In CohnCarol (ed.) Women and Wars: Contested Histories, Uncertain Futures. Cambridge: Polity Press, 215–241.
21.
KennedyRonanPiersonClaireThomsonJennifer (2016) Challenging Identity Hierarchies: Gender and consociational power-sharing. British Journal of Politics & International Relations18(3): 618–633.
22.
KrookMona LeeO’BrienDiana Z (2012) All the President’s Men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. Journal of Politics74(3): 840–855.
23.
LijphartArend (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24.
LijphartArend (2004) Constitutional design for divided societies. Journal of Democracy15(2): 96–109.
25.
LijphartArend (2008) Thinking about Democracy: Power-Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
26.
LijphartArend (2012) Patterns of Democracy (2nd edn). New Haven: Yale University Press.
27.
MackayFionaMurtaghCera (2019) New Institutions, New Gender Rules? A feminist institutionalist lens on women and power-sharing. feminists@law9(1): 1–54.
28.
McCullochAllison (2014) Consociational Settlements in Divided Societies: The liberal-corporate distinction. Democratization21(3): 501–518.
29.
McCruddenChristopherO’LearyBrendan (2013) Courts and Consociations: Human Rights Versus Power-Sharing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
McGarryJohn (2017) What Explains the Performance of Power-Sharing Settlements? In McCullochAllisonMcGarryJohn (eds) Power-Sharing: Empirical and Normative Challenges. London: Routledge, 268–292.
31.
McGarryJohnO’LearyBrendan (2007) Iraq’s Constitution of 2005: Liberal consociation as political prescription. International Journal of Constitutional Law5(4): 670–698.
32.
McGarryJohnO’LearyBrendan (2009) Power Shared After the Death of Thousands. In TaylorRupert (ed.) Consociational Theory: McGarry & O’Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict. London: Routledge, 15–84.
33.
MurtaghCera (2015) Reaching Across: Institutional barriers to cross-ethnic parties in post-conflict societies and the case of Northern Ireland. Nations and Nationalism21(3): 544–565.
34.
NagleJohnFakhouryTamirace (2018) Between Co-optation and Radical Opposition: A comparative analysis of power-sharing on gender equality and LGBTQ rights in Northern Ireland and Lebanon. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics24(1): 82–99.
35.
Ní AoláinFionnuala (2018) The feminist institutional dimensions of power-sharing and political settlements. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics24(1): 116–132.
36.
Ní AoláinFionnualaHaynesDina FrancescaCahnNaomi (2011) On the Frontlines: Gender, War and the Post-Conflict Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
NorrisPippa (2004) Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
O’LearyBrendan (2005) Debating Consociational Politics: Normative and explanatory arguments. In NoelSid (ed.) From Power-Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 3–43.
PhillipsAnne (1995) The Politics of Presence: The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity and Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
PiersonClaireThomsonJennifer (2018) Allies or Opponents? Power-sharing, civil society and gender. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics24(1): 100–115.
42.
PotterMichael (2013) Women in the Northern Ireland Assembly. Research and Information Service Research Paper, Northern Ireland Assembly, Belfast, UK, 3 September.
43.
ShepherdLaura J (2016) Making War Safe for Women? National action plans and the militarisation of the women, peace and security agenda. International Political Science Review37(3): 324–335.
44.
StockemerDanielTremblayManon (2015) Federalism and Women’s Representation: Do federations have more women legislators than centralized states?Publius: The Journal of Federalism45(4): 605–625.
45.
TaylorRupert (2009) The Promise of Consociational Theory. In TaylorRupert (ed.) Consociational Theory: McGarry and O’Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict. London: Routledge, 1–12.
46.
TrueJacqui (2016) Explaining the global diffusion of the women, peace, and security agenda. International Political Science Review37(3): 307–323.
47.
TrueJacquiRiveros-MoralesYolana (2019) Towards inclusive peace: Analysing gender-sensitive peace agreements 2000–2016. International Political Science Review, 40(1): 23–40.
48.
VickersJill (2013) Territorial Pluralism and Family-Law Reform: Conflicts between gender and culture rights in federations, north and south. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies40(1): 57–82.
49.
WalshDawn (2017) Independent Commissions and Contentious Issues in Post-Good Friday Agreement Northern Ireland. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
50.
WaylenGeorgina (2014) A Seat at the Table – Is It Enough? Gender, multiparty negotiations, and institutional design in South Africa and Northern Ireland. Politics and Gender10: 495–523.
51.
WillettSusan (2010) Security Council Resolution 1325: Assessing the impact on women, peace and security. International Peacekeeping17(2): 142–158.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
