Abstract
Why do some countries continue to tax income that multinational firms create overseas, even as other countries increasingly adopt a system that only taxes income generated within the country? I argue that this phenomenon reflects an interaction between trade openness and the number of veto players. Increasing trade openness incentivizes governments to move to a territorial tax system, because firms that operate across borders want to avoid various tax liabilities in multiple countries. Yet countries with fewer veto players are more likely to move to a territorial tax system than those with many veto players. To test my hypothesis, I employ survival and logistic regression analyses of 15 advanced industrialized countries between 1981 and 2013. Overall the findings conform to the expectation: Economically open countries with fewer veto players are more likely to shift to a territorial tax system than those with many veto players.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
