Existing research shows that the combined presence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and military interventions can serve as ‘force multipliers’, leading to improvements in some human security outcomes. In this paper, we examine a couple possible mechanisms that can help to explain why we see these improvements. More specifically, we ask whether this is a result of military intervention aiding in the coordination among NGOs or whether humanitarian interventions, that likely share similar goals with human rights NGOs, provide the security necessary for them to carry out their missions. Using data on military interventions and human rights NGOs, we find that NGOs present in states with humanitarian interventions have more network ties than organizations not in states with interventions. Using the same NGO data and data on terror attacks targeting NGOs, we find less support for the security enhancing effects of humanitarian interventions.
BellSamMurdieAmandaBlocksomePatriciaBrownKevin (2013) Force Multipliers: Conditional Effectiveness of Military and INGO Human Security Interventions. Journal of Human Rights12(4): 397–422.
4.
BymanDaniel (2001) Uncertain Partners: NGOs and the military. Survival43(2): 97–114.
CingranelliDavid LRichardsDavid L.ClayK. Chad (2014) The CIRI Human Rights Dataset. Available at: www.humanrightsdata.com.
7.
ConnorsPeter W (2011) The US Army in Kirkuk: Governance operations on the fault lines of Iraqi society, 2003–2009, Occasional Paper 35. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Combat Studies Institute, United States Army Combined Arms Center.
CooleyAlexanderRonJames (2002) The NGO Scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International Security27(1): 5–39.
10.
GjigasOlinka (1997). A Directory of Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in Central and Eastern Europe (3rd ed.). Hungary: REC Publications.
HannemanRobertRiddleMark (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California. Available at: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/.
13.
HolzgrefeJeff L. (2003) The humanitarian intervention debate. In HolzgrefeJ.L.KeohaneRobert O. (eds) Humanitarian intervention: Ethical, legal, and political dilemmas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 15-52.
14.
KeckMargaretSikkinkKathryn (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15.
KingGaryLangcheZeng (2001) Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data. Political Analysis9(2): 137–163.
16.
LandmanTodd (2005) Protecting Human Rights: A Comparative Study. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
LischerSarah (2007) Military Intervention and the Humanitarian ‘Force Multiplier’. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations13(1): 99–118.
19.
MarshallMonty GJaggersKeith (2010) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2009. Fairfax, VA: Center for Systemic Peace, George Mason University.
MurdieAmandaStapleyCraig (2014) Why Target the ‘Good Guys’? The Determinants of Terrorism Against NGOs. International Interactions40(1): 79–102.
23.
MurdieAmandaDavisDavid R. (2012) Looking in the Mirror: Comparing INGO networks Across issue areas. Review of International Organizations7(2): 177–202.
PearsonFrederic S.BaumannRobert A. (1993) International Military Intervention 1946-1988. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
28.
PeckEric (Brig.Gen) (2012) Information Sharing for Stability and Reconstruction Operations. Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations.
29.
PickeringJeffreyKisanganiEmizet (2006) Political, Economic, and Social Consequences of Foreign Military Intervention. Political Research Quarterly59(3): 363–376.
30.
PickeringJeffreyKisanganiEmizet F. (2009) The International Military Intervention dataset: An updated resource for conflict scholars. Journal of Peace Research46(4): 589-599.
RobertsNancy C (2010) Spanning “Bleeding” Boundaries: Humanitarianism, NGOs, and the civilian-military nexus in the post–cold war era. Public Administration Review70(2): 212–222.
34.
RoseGideonMcChrystalStanley (2013) Generation Kill: A conversation with Stanley McChrystal. Foreign Affairs92(2): 2–8.
35.
SendingOle JacobNeumannIver B. (2006) Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, states, and power. International Studies Quarterly50(3): 651–672.
36.
ShumateMichelleDewittLori (2008) The North/South Divide in NGO Hyperlink Networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(2): 405–428.
37.
SmithJackieWiestDawn (2005) The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and global influences on transnational association. Social Forces84(2): 621–652.
38.
SnijdersTom ABBorgattiStephen P. (1999) Non-parametric Standard Errors and Tests for Network Statistics. Connections22(2): 161–170.
WinslowDonna (2002) Strange Bedfellows: NGOs and the military in humanitarian crises. The International Journal of Peace Studies7(2): 35–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
