State capacity may be a crucial factor conditioning the democratizing power of elections in authoritarian regimes. This paper develops a two-phase theory considers the different effects of state capacity on turnover in elections and democratic change after elections. In regimes with limited state capacity, manipulating elections and repressing opposition is more difficult than in regimes with extensive state capacity, rendering turnover in elections more likely in weak states. However, if the new incumbent has limited capacity to deliver public services and make policy changes after coming to power, sustainable democratic change is unlikely. Hence, state capacity is hypothesized to have a negative effect on turnover, but a positive effect on democratic change. These hypotheses are confirmed in a sample of 460 elections in 110 authoritarian regimes taking place in the period 1974 to 2012 using the Varieties of Democracy dataset. The findings suggest a need to revisit strong-state-first theories of democratization.
AndersenDavidMøllerJørgenSkaaningSvend-Erik (2014a) The State-Democracy Nexus: Conceptual Distinctions, Theoretical Perspectives, and Comparative Approaches. Democratization21(7): 1203–1220.
2.
AndersenDavidMøllerJørgenRørbækLasse LykkeSkaaningSvend-Erik (2014b) State Capacity and Political Regime Stability. Democratization21(7): 1305–1325.
3.
AndersonChristopher J (2007) The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability. Annual Review of Political Science10: 271–296.
4.
BarkanJoel D (2000) Protracted Transitions among Africa’s New Democracies. Democratization7(3): 227–243.
CroissantAurelHellmannOlli. Introduction: State Capacity and Elections in the Study of Authoritarian Regimes. In: “State Capacity and the Survival of Electoral Authoritarianism”, Special IssueInternational Political Science Review. DOI: 10.1177/0192512117700066.
9.
DoorenspleetRenskeKopeckyPetr (2008) Against the Odds: Deviant Cases of Democratization. Democratization15(4): 697–713.
10.
EdgellAmandaMechkovaValeriyaAltmanDavidBernhardMichaelLindbergStaffan I (2015) End of the Debate on the Democratizing Effects of Elections? New Empirical Evidence 1900–2014. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 3–6 September 2015, San Francisco.
11.
EvansEric J (1989) Britain before the Reform Act: Politics and Society 1815–1832. London: Longman.
12.
FloresThomas ENooruddinIrfan (2016) Elections in Hard Times. Building Stronger Democracies in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
FortinJessica (2012) Is There a Necessary Condition for Democracy? The Role of State Capacity in Postcommunist Countries. Comparative Political Studies45(7): 903–930.
14.
FukuyamaFrancis (2004) State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15.
FukuyamaFrancis (2014) States and Democracy. Democratization21(7): 1326–1340.
16.
GandhiJenniferLust-OkarEllen (2009) Elections under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science12: 403–422.
17.
GibsonEdward L (2013) Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HansonJonathan KSigmanRachel (2013) Leviathan’s Latent Dimensions: Measuring State Capacity for Comparative Political Research. Unpublished Manuscript.
19.
HansonJonathan K. State Capacity and Authoritarian Resilience: Conceptualizing and Measuring the Institutional Underpinnings of Autocratic Power. In: State Capacity and the Survival of Electoral Authoritarianism, Special IssueInternational Political Science Review. DOI: 10.1177/0192512117702523.
20.
HellmannOlli. High Capacity, Low Resilience: The ‘Developmental’ state and Military-Bureaucratic Authoritarianism in South Korea. In: State Capacity and the Survival of Electoral Authoritarianism, Special IssueInternational Political Science Review. DOI: 10.1177/0192512117692643.
21.
HowardMarc MRoesslerPhilip G (2006) Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science50(2): 365–381.
22.
HuntingtonSamuel P (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
23.
KeyValdimer O (1949) Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage Books.
24.
LehoucqFabrice (2003) Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences. Annual Review of Political Science6: 233–256.
25.
LevitskySteveWayLucan (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
LindbergStaffan (2006) Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore, OH: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
LindbergStaffan (ed.) (2009) Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition. Baltimore, OH: John Hopkins University Press.
28.
MagaloniBeatrizKricheliRuth (2010) Political Order and One-Party Rule. Annual Review of Political Science13: 123–143.
29.
MagaloniBeatriz (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
MansfieldEdward DSnyderJack L (2007) The Sequencing ‘Fallacy’. Journal of Democracy18(3): 5–10.
31.
MazzucaSebastián LMunckGerardo L (2014) State or Democracy First? Alternative Perspectives on the State-Democracy Nexus. Democratization21(7): 1221–1243.
32.
MickeyRobert (2015) Paths Out of Dixie: The Democratization of Authoritarian Enclaves in America’s Deep South, 1944–1972. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
MietznerM. Authoritarian elections, state capacity, and performance legitimacy: Phases of regime consolidation and decline in Suharto’s Indonesia, Special IssueInternational Political Science Review. DOI: 10.1177/0192512116687139.
34.
PrzeworskiAdamAlvarezMichaelCheibubJose AntonioLimongiFernando (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SchedlerAndreas (2002) The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy13(2): 36–50.
36.
SchedlerAndreas (2013) The Politics of Uncertainty. Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
SeebergMerete B (2014) State Capacity and the Paradox of Authoritarian Elections. Democratization21(7): 1265–1285.
38.
SikkinkKathryn (1991) Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39.
SlaterDan (2012) Strong-State Democratization in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Democracy23(2): 19–33.
40.
SlaterDanFennerSofia (2011) State Power and Staying Power: Infrastructural Mechanisms and Authoritarian Durability. Journal of International Affairs65(1): 15–29.
41.
StepanAlfred (2012) Tunisia’s Transition and the Twin Tolerations. Journal of Democracy23(2): 89–103.
42.
TeorellJan (2010) Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
TeorellJanDahlbergStefanHolmbergSörenRothsteinBoHartmannFelixSvenssonRichard (2015) The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, version Jan 15. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Available at: http://www.qog.pol.gu.se
44.
WayLucan (2005) Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave: The cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. World Politics57(2): 231–261.
45.
WeberMax (1918) Politics as a Vocation. In GerthHans HMillsC Wright1946 [1919] (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, 77–128.
46.
WhiteDavid. State Capacity and Regime Resilience in Putin’s Russia. In: “State Capacity and the Survival of Electoral Authoritarianism”, Special IssueInternational Political Science Review. DOI: 10.1177/0192512117694481
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
