This article attempts to analyze the process of selective history and hegemony-making in Singapore, and makes the following arguments. Firstly, the birth of the nation-state led the political elites to rely on several hegemonic ideologies as founding myths, chief of which is the idea of ‘survival’. Secondly, to create and sustain these ideologies, two things needed to be done concurrently: de-emphasize the Malay-ness of the nation’s past; and accentuate the racial/religious nature of sources to instability. Finally, the article makes the claim that these ideologies have been successfully perpetuated, and outlines the contours of this success. In making these arguments, the article hopes to argue against Singapore ‘exceptionalism’ in studies on democratization, and further contends that the link between ideas, history and authoritarianism needs to be considered more seriously.
AbdullahWalid Jumblatt (2015) Bringing Ideology In: Differing oppositional challenges to hegemony in Singapore and Malaysia. Government and Opposition. Epub ahead of print.
2.
AbdullahWalid Jumblatt (2016) Assessing Party Structures: Why some parties are more authoritarian than others. Australian Journal of International Affairs. Epub ahead of print.
3.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames A (2006) Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AndersonBenedict (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
5.
BarrMichael D (1997) Lee Kuan Yew in Malaysia: A reappraisal of Lee Kuan Yew’s role in the separation of Singapore from Malaysia. Asian Studies Review21 (1): 1–17.
6.
BarrMichael D (2016) Ordinary Singapore: The decline of Singapore exceptionalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia46(1): 1–17.
7.
BymanDanielLindJennifer (2010) Pyongyang’s Survival Strategy: Tools of authoritarian control in North Korea. International Security35(1): 44–74.
8.
ChanHeng Chee (1971) Singapore: The Politics of Survival, 1965–1967. Singapore, Malaysia: Oxford University Press.
9.
CharronNicholasBagenholmAndreas (2016) Ideology, Party Systems and Corruption Voting in European Democracies. Electoral Studies41(1): 35–49.
10.
ChinJamesWongChin Huat (2009) Malaysia’s Electoral Upheaval. Journal of Democracy20(3): 71–85.
11.
ChuaLynette (2014) Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in Authoritarian Singapore. Singapore, Malaysia: NUS Press.
12.
CunhaDerek da (2012) Breakthrough: Roadmap for Singapore’s Political Future. Singapore, Malaysia: Straits Times Press.
13.
FeldmanStanley (1988) Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science32(2): 416–440.
14.
GandhiJenniferPrzeworskiAdam (2006) Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion under Dictatorships. Economics & Politics18(1): 1–26.
15.
GeddesBarbara (1999) What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 115–144.
16.
GreeneKenneth F (2007) Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HaiYap TeohEngJuan Ng (1997) Singapore. In RonaldMa (ed.) Financial Reporting in the Pacific Asia Region. Singapore, Malaysia: World Scientific, 303–323.
18.
Hamilton MalcolmB (1987) The Elements of the Concept of Ideology. Political Studies35(1): 18–38.
19.
HanFook KwangIbrahimZuraidahLinRachelChanRobinChuaMui HoongLimLydiaLowIgnatius (2011) Lee Kuan Yew: Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going. Singapore, Malaysia: Straits Times Press.
20.
HengDerekSoonThiam (2002) Reconstructing Banzu, a Fourteenth-Century Port Settlement in Singapore. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society75(1): 69–90.
21.
HongLisaHuangJianli (2008) The Scripting of a National History: Singapore and its Past. Singapore, Malaysia: NUS Press.
22.
Hue-TamHo Tai (2001) Remembered Realms: Pierre Nora and French national memory. The American Historical Review106(3): 906–922.
23.
HuffWG (1995) What is the Singapore Model of Economic Development?Cambridge Journal of Economics19(6): 735–759.
24.
HuxleyTim (1991) Singapore and Malaysia: A precarious balance?”The Pacific Review4(3): 204–213.
25.
LauAlbert (1998) A Moment of Anguish: Singapore in Malaysia and the Politics of Disengagement. Singapore, Malaysia: Times Academic Press.
26.
LauAlbert (2005) Nation-Building and the Singapore Story: Some issues in the study of contemporary Singapore history. In WangGungwu (ed.) Nation Building: Five Southeast Asian Histories. Singapore, Malaysia: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 221–250.
27.
LeeKuan Yew (1998) The Singapore Story: Memoirs of Lee Kuan Yew. Singapore, Malaysia: Singapore Press Holdings.
28.
LevitskyStevenWayLucan A (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
LohKah Seng (1998) Within the Singapore Story: The usse and narrative of history in Singapore. Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies12(2): 1–21.
30.
MagaloniBeatriz (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MiksicJohn N (2004) 14th-Century Singapore: A port of trade. In MiksicJohn NLowCheryl-Ann Mei Gek (eds) Early Singapore 1300s–1819: Evidence in Maps, Text and Artefacts. Singapore, Malaysia: Singapore History Museum, 41–54.
32.
MilneRS (1966) Singapore’s Exit from Malaysia; The consequences of ambiguity. Asian Survey6(3): 175–184.
33.
MullinsWillard A (1972) On the Concept of Ideology in Political Science. American Political Science Review66(2): 498–510.
34.
MutalibHussin (2003) Parties and Politics: A Study of Opposition Parties and the PAP in Singapore. Singapore, Malaysia: Eastern Universities Press.
35.
MutalibHussin (2012) The Singapore Malays: Being Ethnic Minority and Muslim in a Global City-State. Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
NasrSeyyedRezaVali (2001) Islamic Leviathan: Islam and the Making of State Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
OrtmannStephan (2010) Politics and Change in Singapore and Hong Kong: Containing Contention. Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
OrtmannStephanThompsonMark R (2016) China and the “Singapore Model. Journal of Democracy27(1): 39–48.
39.
RahimLily Zubaidah (1998) The Singapore Dilemma: The Political and Educational Marginality of the Malay Community. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Oxford University Press.
40.
RahimLily Zubaidah (2009) Singapore in the Malay World: Building and Breaching Regional Bridges. Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
RodanGarry (1998) The Internet and Political Control in Singapore. Political Research Quarterly113(1): 63–89.
42.
RoffWilliam R (1964) The Malayo-Muslim World of Singapore at the Close of the Nineteenth Century. Journal of Asian Studies24(1): 75–90.
43.
SlaterDan (2010) Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TanKenneth Paul (2008) Meritocracy and Elitism in a Global City: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review29(1): 7–27.
45.
TanKenneth Paul (2012) The Ideology of Pragmatism: Neo-liberal globalisation and political authoritarianism in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia42(1): 67–92.
46.
WongTing-Hong (2003) Education and State Formation Reconsidered: Chinese school identity in postwar Singapore. Journal of Historical Sociology16(2): 237–265.
47.
WoolcockJoseph A (1985) Politics, Ideology and Hegemony in Gramsci’s Theory. Social and Economic Studies34(3): 199–210.
