Political protests cannot succeed without public support. Extant studies point to weaker average support among ideological conservatives, but researchers have yet to consider the extent to which such apparent ideological asymmetry is (a) an artifact of the particular protest cases that researchers have tended to investigate, and/or (b) conditioned by the precise meaning of “ideological conservatism.” In this investigation, we address these gaps. Specifically, we analyze public perceptions of protest legitimacy after exposing survey respondents to one of a series of experimental treatments that randomize the specific ideological and issue contents of the particular protests under consideration. In iterative models, we observe how political ideology, social dominance orientation and authoritarianism condition the effects associated with these experimental treatments. The data suggest that that the notorious ideological asymmetry that is often associated with support for protests is authentic, but it is also conditioned in important ways by these other factors.
AgnoneJ. (2007). Amplifying public opinion: The political impact of the US environmental movement. Social Forces, 85(4), 593–620.
2.
AhlerD. J.RoushC. E.SoodG. (2019). The micro-task market for lemons: Data quality on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (Working paper). http://gsood.com/research/papers/turk.pdf
3.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
4.
AltemeyerB. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Jossey-Bass.
5.
AndrewsK. T.BeyerleinK.FarnumT. T. (2016). The legitimacy of protest: Explaining white southerners’ attitudes toward the civil rights movement. Social Forces, 94(3), 1021–1044.
6.
BarkerD. C. (2002). Rushed to judgment: Talk radio, persuasion, and American political behavior. Columbia University Press.
7.
BarkerD. C.TinnickJ. D.II. (2006). Competing visions of parental roles and ideological constraint. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 249–263.
8.
BarretoM. A.ManzanoS.RamirezR.RimK. (2009). Mobilization, participation, and solidaridad: Latino participation in the 2006 immigration protest rallies. Urban Affairs Review, 44(5), 736–764.
9.
BaumM. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91–109.
10.
Benjamin-AlvaradoJ.DeSipioL.MontoyaC. (2009). Latino mobilization in new immigrant destinations: The anti-H.R. 4437 protest in Nebraska’s cities. Urban Affairs Review, 44(5), 718–735.
11.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368.
12.
BoboL. (1988). Attitudes toward the Black political movement: Trends, meaning, and effects on racial policy preference. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 287–302.
13.
BoboL.LicariF. C. (1989). Education and political tolerance: Testing the effects of cognitive sophistication and target group affect. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(3), 285–308.
14.
BrantonR.Martinez-EbersV.CareyT. E.Jr.MatsubayashiT. (2015). Social protest and policy attitudes: The case of the 2006 immigrant rallies. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 390–402.
15.
BraudeA. (2004). A religious feminist—Who can find her? Historiographical challenges from the National Organization for Women. The Journal of Religion, 84(4), 555–572.
16.
ByrdJ. P. (2013). Sacred scripture, sacred war: The bible and the American revolution. Oxford University Press.
17.
CarminesE. G.ZellerR. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences; 17). SAGE.
18.
ChenowethE.StephanM. J. (2012). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.
19.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Reviews of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
20.
ClementS.GreenJ. C. (2011). The tea party, religion and social issues. Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
21.
CohrsJ. C.AsbrockF. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 270–289.
22.
CrawfordJ. T.XhambaziE. (2013). Predicting political biases against the occupy wall Street and tea party movements. Political Psychology, 36(1), 111–121.
23.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 113–130.
24.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6): 1861–1894.
25.
DupontC. R. (2013). Mississippi praying: Southern White evangelicals and the civil rights movement, 1945–1975. New York University Press.
26.
FeldmanS.StennerK. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18(4), 741–770.
27.
FiskeS.TaylorS. (1984). Social cognition. Random House.
28.
FitzgeraldF. (2017). The evangelicals: The struggle to shape America. Simon & Schuster.
29.
GamsonW. A. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Dorsey Press.
30.
GibsonJ. L. (1992). The political consequences of intolerance: Cultural conformity and political freedom. The American Political Science Review, 86(2), 338–356.
31.
GilensM. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy (Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion). University of Chicago Press.
32.
GillionD. Q. (2012). Protest and congressional behavior: Assessing racial and ethnic minority protests in the district. Journal of Politics, 74(4), 950–962.
33.
GoidelR. K.PeffleyM.ShieldsT. (1997). Priming theory and RAS models: Toward an integrated perspective of media influence. American Politics Research, 25(3), 287–318.
34.
GurneyJ. N.TierneyK. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and social movements: A critical look at twenty years of theory and research. The Sociological Quarterly, 23(1), 33–47.
35.
GurrT. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.
36.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.
37.
HallR. L.RodeghierM.UseemB. (1986). Effects of education on attitude to protest. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 564–573.
38.
HastieR.ParkB. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258–268.
HetheringtonM. J. (1996). The media’s role in forming voters’ national economic evaluations in 1992. American Political Science Review, 40(2), 372–395.
41.
HetheringtonM. J.WeilerJ. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.
42.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.FoelsR.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the New SDO7 Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028.
43.
HochschildA. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press.
44.
HuddyL.FeldmanS.TaberC.LahavG. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 593–608.
45.
IyengarS. (1991). Is anyone responsible?University of Chicago Press.
46.
IyengarS.KinderD. R. (1987). News that matters. University of Chicago Press.
47.
IyengarS.PetersM. D.KinderD. R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. The American Political Science Review, 76(4), 848–858.
48.
JacobsL. R.ShapiroR. Y. (1994). Issues, candidate image, and priming: The use of private polls in Kennedy’s 1960 presidential campaign. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 527–540.
JeffriesV.TunerR. H.MorrisR. T. (1971). The public perception of the watts riot as social protest. American Sociological Review, 36(3), 443–451.
51.
JonesR. P. (2016). The end of White Christian America. Simon & Schuster.
52.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.
53.
KernellS. (1986). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership. CQ Press.
54.
KrosnickJ.KinderD. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. The American Political Science Review, 84(2), 497–512.
55.
LeeT. (2002). Mobilizing public opinion: Black insurgency and racial attitudes in the civil rights era. University of Chicago Press.
56.
LevayK. E.FreeseJ.DruckmanJ. L. (2016). The demographic and political composition of mechanical turk samples. Sage Open, Volume 6.
MadestamA.ShoagD.VeugerS.Yanagizawa-DrottD. (2013). Do political protests matter? Evidence from the tea party movement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1633–1685.
59.
MartinezL. M. (2008). Flowers from the same soil: Latino solidarity in the wake of the 2006 immigrant mobilizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(4), 557–579.
60.
McAdamsD.TarrowS.TillyC. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.
61.
McCombsM. E.ShawD. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
62.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2008). The nature and social bases of progressive social movement ideology: Examining public opinion toward social movements. Sociological Quarterly, 49(4), 825–848.
63.
McLeodD. M. (1995). Communicating deviance: The effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(1), 4–19.
64.
McLeodD. M.DetenberB. H. (1999). Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication, 49(3), 3–23.
65.
McLeodD.HertogJ. (1992). The manufacture of “public opinion” by reporters: Informal cues for public perceptions of protest groups. Discourse and Society, 3(3), 259–275.
66.
McVeighR. (2009). The rise of the Ku Klux Klan: Right-wing movements and national politics (Vol. 32). University of Minnesota Press.
67.
McVeighR.MyersD. J.SikkinkD. (2004). Corn, klansmen, and coolidge: Structure and framing in social movements. Social Forces, 83(2), 653–690.
68.
MontgomeryJ. M.NyhanB.TorresM. (2018). How conditioning on post-treatment variables can ruin your experiment and what to do about it. American Journal of Political Science, 62(3), 660–675.
69.
MohamedH. S. (2013). Can protests make Latinos “American”? Identity, immigration politics, and the 2006 marches. American Politics Research, 41(2), 298–327.
70.
MunsonZ. W. (2010). The making of pro-life activists: How social movement mobilization works. University of Chicago Press.
71.
NiemiR. G.JunnJ. (2005). Civic education: What makes students learn. Yale University Press.
72.
OlsenM. E. (1968). Perceived legitimacy of social protest actions. Social Problems, 15(3), 297–310.
73.
PanZ.KosickiG. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75.
74.
PantojaA. D.MenjivarC.MaganaL. (2008). The spring marches of 2006: Latinos, immigration, and political mobilization in the 21st century. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(4), 499–506.
75.
ParkerC. S.BarretoM. A. (2014). Change they can’t believe in: The tea party and reactionary politics in America-updated edition. Princeton University Press.
PivenF. F.ClowardR. A. (1979). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. Pantheon.
78.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320.
79.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763.
80.
ReinkaM. A.LeachC. W. (2017). Race and reaction: Divergent views of police violence and protest against. Journal of Social Issues, 73(4), 768–788.
81.
RikerW. H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. Yale University Press.
82.
RimK. H. (2009). Latino and Asian American mobilization in the 2006 immigration protests. Social Science Quarterly, 90(3), 703–721.
83.
SchattschneiderE. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Dryden Press.
84.
SchumakerP. D. (1975). Policy responsiveness to protest-group demands. The Journal of Politics, 37(2), 488–521.
85.
SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H. (2010). Social dominance orientation: Testing a global individual difference perspective. Political Psychology, 31(2), 175–207.
86.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
87.
SkocpolT.WilliamsonV. (2012). The tea party and the remaking of republican conservatism. Oxford University Press.
88.
SmidtC. E.KellstedtL. A.GuthJ. L. (2009). The Oxford handbook of religion and American politics. Oxford University Press.
89.
StennerK. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.
90.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuaganoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97.
91.
StoufferS. A. (1955). Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. Doubleday & Company Inc.
92.
SullivanJ. L.MarcusG. E.FeldmanS.PieresonJ. E. (1981). The sources of political tolerance: A multivariate analysis. American Political Science Review, 75(1), 92–106.
93.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.AustinW. G.WorchelS. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.) Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 56–65).
94.
TuntiyaN. (2005). Fundamentalist religious affiliation and support for civil liberties: A critical reexamination. Sociological Inquiry, 75(2), 153–176.
95.
TverskyA.KhanemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.
96.
ValentinoN. A.HutchingsV. L.WhiteI. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90.
97.
WallaceS. J.Zepeda-MillánC.Jones-CorreaM. (2014). Spatial and temporal proximity: Examining the effects of protests on political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 433–448.
98.
WilcoxC.GomezL. (1990). The christian right and the pro-life movement: An analysis of the sources of political support. Review of Religious Research, 31(4), 380–389.
99.
WrightM.CitrinJ. (2010). Saved by the stars and stripes? Images of protest, salience of threat, and immigration attitudes. American Politics Research, 39(2), 323–343.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
