In this article, we analyse the mechanisms of agenda setting by focusing on the determinants of individual attitudes towards crime and investigating the role played by the media. After a brief literature review supporting the relevance of the selected topic of inquiry and the presentation of our analytical framework, we study the persuasion effects of mass media. More specifically, we investigate how TV exposure can shape individual perceptions of specific issues such as crime, and then focus on the effects of exposure to crime news on voting decisions. Using the Italian 2001 general election as an important case study of TV power concentration, we provide evidence that media-induced agenda setting enhanced the salience of the crime issue in voters’ minds during the 2001 Italian general election and contributed to the victory of the coalition led by Silvio Berlusconi. Interestingly, our results are partially driven by the switch of previous left-wing voters to voting for the centre right because of exposure to crime news.
BraderTed (2006) Campaigning for Hearts and Minds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BriansCraig LeonardWattenbergMartin P (1996) Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science40(1): 172–193.
4.
CampbellAngusConversePhilip EMillerWarren EStokesDonald E (1960) The American Voter. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
5.
CaplanBrian (2007) The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Canes-WroneBrandiceHerronMichael CShottsKenneth W (2001) Leadership and Pandering: a theory of executive policymaking. American Journal of Political Science45(3): 532–550.
7.
ConversePhilip E (2006) Researching Electoral Politics. American Political Science Review100(4): 605–612.
8.
Della VignaStefanoKaplanEthan (2007) The Fox News Effect: media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics122(August2007): 1187–1234.
9.
DuranteRubenKnightBrian (2012) Partisan Control, Media Bias, and Viewer Responses: evidence from Berlusconi’s Italy. Journal of the European Economic Association10(3): 451–481.
10.
EnikolopovRubenPetrovaMariaZhuravskayaEkaterina (2011) Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia.American Economic Review101(7): 3253–85.
11.
FeddersenTimothy JPesendorferWolfgang (1996) The Swing Voter’s Curse. American Economic Review86(3): 408–424.
12.
FurediFrank (2005) Politics of Fear: Beyond Left and Right. London: Continuum Press.
13.
GardnerDan (2009) Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear. London: Virgin Books.
14.
GentzkowMShapiroJesse (2004) Media, Education, and Anti-Americanism in the Muslin World. Journal of Economic Perspectives18(3): 117–133.
15.
GerringJohn (2007) Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?Comparative Political Studies40(3): 231–253.
16.
HallinDaniel CManciniPaolo (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LarcineseValentinoPuglisiRiccardoSnyderJames (2011) Partisan Bias in Economic News: evidence on the agenda-setting behavior of U.S. newspapers. Journal of Public Economics95(9/10): 1178–1189.
23.
LawsonChappelMcCannJames A (2004) Television News, Mexico’s 2000 Elections, and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies. British Journal of Political Science35(1): 1–30.
24.
LazarsfeldPaulBerelsonBernardGaudetHazel (1944) The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
25.
LegnanteGuidoBaldassarriDelia (2010) Campagne Elettorali e Mediazione Sociale: esposizione ai media e relazioni interpersonali. In BellucciPaoloSegattiPaolo (eds) Votare in Italia: 1968–2008. Bologna, Italy: il Mulino.
26.
L’Ulivo per Rutelli – insieme per l’Italia (2001) Rinnoviamo l’Italia, insieme. Il programma dell’Ulivo per il governo 2001–2006 presentato da Francesco Rutelli. mimeo. Available at: http://www.perlulivo.it/politiche2001/programma.pdf
27.
LupiaArthurMenningJesse O (2009) When can politicians scare citizens into supporting bad policies?American Journal of Political Science53(1): 90–106.
28.
ManciniPaolo (ed) (2003) La Posta in Gioco. Temi, Personaggi e Satira nella Campagna Elettorale 2001. Rome, Italy: Carocci.
29.
ManciniPaolo (2009) Elogio della Lottizzazione: La Via Italiana al Pluralismo. Rome-Bari, Italy: Laterza.
30.
MarcheseMirellaMilazzoGiuseppe (2001) L’Agenda dei Telegiornali sulle Notizie di Criminalità e Immigrazione: Un Confronto tra il 2000 e il 2001. Osservatorio di Pavia, mimeo. Available at: http://www.osservatorio.it/download/criminalita.pdf.
31.
MarlettiCarlo (2002) Il ciclo dell’antipolitica e i risultati delle elezioni del 13 maggio in Italia.Verso un nuovo clima d’opinione?. Comunicazione Politica3(1): 9–30.
32.
McCombsMaxwell E (2005) A Look at Agenda Setting: past, present and future. Journalism Studies6(4): 543–557.
33.
McCombsMaxwell EShawDonald L (1972) The Agenda Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly36(2): 176–187.
RobinsonJames ATorvikRagnar (2008) The Real Swing Voter’s Curse. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings99(2): 310–315.
40.
WantaWayneGhanemSalma (2007) Effects of Agenda Setting. In PreissRWGayleBMBurrellNAllenMBryantJ (eds) Mass Media Effects Research: Advances Through Meta-Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 37–51.
41.
WeaverDavid H (2007) Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing and Priming. Journal of Communication57(1): 142–147.
42.
WhiteStephenOatesSarahMcAllisterIan (2005) Media Effects and the Russian Elections, 1999–2000. British Journal of Political Science34(2): 191–208.
43.
WitteKim (1992) Putting the Fear Back into Fear Appeals: the extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs59(4): 329–349.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
