Many claims have been made for the impact of deliberative democracy in generating change in people’s opinions, and often in predictable ways. It is claimed that people involved in deliberation change their minds on important issues. We also know that political participation and attitudes towards certain issues depend on political knowledge and civic education. To what extent are these linked? Do certain types of people react differently to their involvement in deliberation and is opinion change contingent on the varying capacities and knowledge of participants? Using data from a nationwide exercise in deliberative democracy carried out in Ireland we find some evidence that the ‘deliberative’ citizen, or at least the citizen most likely to shift opinion following deliberation, is under 65, with median levels of knowledge. We also find that heterogeneous groups are important for deliberation to be effective.
AlwinDuane FCohenRonald LNewcombTheodore M (1991) Aging, personality and social change: Attitude persistence and change over the lifespan. Madison: University of Winsconsin Press.
2.
BarabasJason (2004) How deliberation affects policy opinions. American Political Science Review98(4): 687–701.
3.
BohnerGerdDickelNina (2011) Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology62(1): 391–417.
4.
BriñolPabloPettyRichard E (2005). Individual differences in persuasion. In: JohnsonDolores Albarracín Blair TZannaMark P (eds) The handbook of attitudes and attitude change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 575–616.
5.
BrownRoger (1986) Social Psychology: The Second Edition. New York: The Free Press.
6.
BizerGeorge Y (2004). Attitudes. In: SpielbergerCharles (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7.
CacioppoJohn TPettyRichard E (1980) Sex differences in influenceability: Toward Specifying the underlying processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin6(4): 651–656.
8.
ChambersSimone (1996) Reasonable Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
ChambersSimone (2003) Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science6(1): 307–326.
10.
Delli CarpiniMichael XCookFay LomaxJacobsLawrence R (2004) Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Departmental Papers, Annenburg School of Communication 1-1-2004.
11.
DigmanJohn M (1990) Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology41(1): 417–440.
12.
DryzekJohn (2009) Democratization as deliberative capacity building. Comparative Political Studies42(11): 1379–1402.
13.
DryzekJohn SBraithwaiteValerie (2000) On the Prospects for Democratic Deliberation: Values Analysis Applied to Australian Politics. Political Psychology21(2): 241–266.
14.
ElsterJon (1997) The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory. In: BohmanJamesRhegWilliam (eds), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge: MIT Press, 3–34.
15.
EvelandWilliam PThompsonTiffany (2006) Is it talking, thinking or both? A lagged dependent variable model of discussion effects on political knowledge. Journal of Communication56 (3): 523–542.
16.
FarrellDavid M (2013) Deliberative democracy Irish-style: Ireland’s Constitutional Convention of 2013. Inroads34(1): 110–117.
17.
FarrellDavid M (2014). ‘Stripped down’ or reconfigured democracy. West European Politics37(2): 439–455.
18.
FarrellDavid MO’MalleyEoinSuiterJane (2013) Deliberative democracy in Action Irish-style: The 2011 We The Citizens Pilot Citizens’ Assembly. Irish Political Studies28(1): 99–113.
19.
FishkinJamesLuskinRobert (1999) Bringing deliberation to the democratic dialogue. In: McCombsMaxwellReynoldsAmy (eds) A Poll with a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 3–38.
20.
FishkinJames (2009) When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
FlynnFrancis J (2005) Having an open mind: The impact of openness to experience on interracial attitudes and impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88(5): 816–826.
22.
FournierPatrickKolkHenk van derCartyKen. (2011) When Citizens Decide: Lessons from Citizen Assemblies on Electoral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
GaertnerSamuel LDovidioJohn FNierJason. (1999a) Across cultural divides: The value of a superordinate identity. In: PrenticeDeborah AMillerDale T (eds) Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 173–212.
24.
GaertnerSamuel LDovidioJohn FRustMary C. (1999b) Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76(3): 388–402.
25.
GalstonWilliam (2001) Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review Political Science4(1): 217–234.
26.
GeorgeJenniferZhouJing (2001) When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3): 513–524.
27.
HimmelroosStaffanChristensenHenrik Serup (2012) Deliberative Capacity and Opinion Change – Evidence from a Deliberative Mini-public, Political Studies Association Annual International Conference in Belfast, 3–5 April.
28.
JohnOliver P (1990) The ‘Big Five’ factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In PervinLawrence A (ed.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Practice. New
29.
KenskiKateJamiesonKathleen Hall (2000) The Gap in Political Knowledge: Are Women Less Knowledgeable Than Men About Politics? In: JamiesonKathleen Hall (ed) Everything You Think You Know About Politics . . . And Why You’re Wrong. New York: Basic Books.
30.
LauriolaMarcoLevineIrwin P (2001) Personality traits and risky decision making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences31(2): 215–226.
31.
LuskinRobertFishkinJamesJowellRoger (2002) Considered opinions: deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science32(3): 455–487.
McCraeRobert (1987) Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52(6): 1258–1265.
34.
McCraeRobert (1996) Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin120(3): 323–337.
35.
McCraeRobert RCostaPaul TJr (1997) Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In: HoganRobertJohnsonJohn (eds) Handbook of Personality Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 836–849.
36.
MendelbergTali (2002) The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. In: Delli CarpiniMichael XHuddyLeonieShapiroRobert Y (eds) Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation: Research in Micropolitics, Volume 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 511–558.
37.
MillerJoanneKrosnickJon (2000) News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 295–309.
38.
MondakJeffrey JAndersonMary R (2004) The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge. Journal of Politics66(2): 492–512.
39.
MuhlbergerPeterWeberLori M (2006) Lessons from the Virtual Agora Project: The Effects of Agency, Identity, Information, and Deliberation on Political Knowledge. Journal of Public Deliberation2(1): 13. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol2/iss1/art13
40.
MutzDiana (2006) Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative vs Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
MyersDavid GLammHelmut (1975) The polarizing effects of group discussionAmerican Scientist63: 297–303. (Reprinted in Irving L Janis (ed) Current Trends in Psychology. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman, 1977).
42.
MyersDavid GBishopGeorge D (1970) Discussion effects on racial attitudesScience169(3947): 778–779.
43.
NorranderBarbara (1999) The Evolution of the Gender GapPublic Opinion Quarterly63(4): 566–576.
44.
PomerantzEva MChaikenShellyTordesillasRosalind S (1995) Attitude Strength and Resistance Processes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology69(3): 408–419.
45.
PopkinSamuel LDimockMichael A (2000) Knowledge, trust, and international reasoning. In LupiaArthurMcCubbinsMatthewPopkinSamuel L (eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 214–238.
46.
PosnerRichard A (2003) Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
RyfeDavid M (2005) Does deliberative democracy work?Annual Review of Political Science8(1): 49–71.
48.
SandersLynn (1997) Against deliberation. Political Theory25(3): 347–376.
49.
SetäläMaijaGrönlundKimmoHerneKaisa (2010) Citizen deliberation on nuclear power: A comparison of two decision-making methods. Political Studies58(4): 688–714.
50.
ShapiroRobert YMahajanHarpreet (1986) Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s and 1980sPublic Opinion Quarterly50(1): 42– 61.
51.
SistrunkFrankMcDavidJohn W (1971) Sex variable in conformity behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology17(2): 200–207.
52.
SnidermanPaulBrodyRichardTetlockPhilip (1991) Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
StasserGaroldStewartDennis (1992) Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(3): 426–434.
54.
SteenbergenMarco RBächtigerAndreSpörndliMarcus. (2003) Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics1(1): 21–48.
55.
SteinerJorg (2012) The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy: Empirical Research and Normative Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
SulkinTracyAdamSimon F (2001) Habermas in the lab: A study of deliberation in an experimental setting. Political Psychology22(4): 809–826.
57.
SunsteinCass R (2000) Deliberative trouble? Why groups go to extremes. The Yale Law Journal110(1): 71–119.
58.
SunsteinCass R (2005). Group judgments: Statistical means, deliberation, and information markets. New York University Law Review80(3): 962–1049.
59.
SunsteinCass R (2009) Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
SunsteinCass RPayneJohnSchkadeDavid. (2003) Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61.
VisserPenny SHolbrookAllyson LKrosnickJon A (2008) Knowledge and attitudes. In DonsbachWolfgangTraugottMichael W (eds) Handbook of Public Opinion Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 127–140.
WhitleyBernard E (1999) Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(1): 126–134.
64.
ZallerJohn (1990) Political awareness, elite opinion leadership and the mass survey response. Social Cognition8(1): 125–153.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
