A member of the Honduran elite and elected president with a right-of-center platform in 2005, Manuel Zelaya soon came to be allied with Latin America’s bloc of radical left-wing governments – this being the first case of a post-democratization right-to-left policy switch in the region. The aim of this article is to assess the reasons that could have motivated Zelaya’s ideological turn. After a brief discussion of the Honduran political process, we review the literature about the issue of policy switching and proceed to an empirical analysis of the Honduran case. We find that the fragility of the country’s energy sector and the alliance with Venezuela in a context of international economic crisis and high oil prices could have triggered a causal mechanism in Honduras similar to the one caused by currency scarcity and international pressure pointed to by the literature as the leading cause for traditional left-to-right switches, which suggests that this case study could serve as a pattern-matching exercise to the general findings of currently accepted switch theory.
Ajenjo FresnoN (2007) Honduras: Nuevo gobierno liberal con la misma agenda política. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), Special Issue 27: 165–81.
2.
AlegreP. (2010) Las izquierdas latinoamericanas: De la oposición al gobierno. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
3.
Altmann BorbónJ (2009) El ALBA, Petrocaribe y Centroamérica: ¿intereses comunes?Nueva Sociedad (219): 127–44.
4.
CálixÁ (2010) Honduras: De la crisis política al surgimiento de un nuevo actor social. Nueva Sociedad (226): 34–51.
5.
CampelloD (2011) The politics of redistribution in less developed democracies: Evidence from Brazil, Ecuador and Venezuela. In: BlofieldM (ed.) The Great Gap: Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Latin America. University Park: Penn State University Press.
6.
CampelloD (forthcoming) The politics of financial booms and crises: Evidence from Latin America. Comparative Political Studies47(5).
7.
CastañedaJG (2006) Latin America’s left turn. Foreign Affairs85(3): 28–43.
8.
CastellanosJ (2006) Honduras: Gobernabilidad democrática y sistema político. Nueva Sociedad, Special Issue.
CuestaJ (2007) Political space, pro-poor growth and poverty reduction strategy in Honduras: A story of missed opportunities. Journal of Latin American Studies39(2): 329–54.
11.
Da CruzASJr (2008) Fazendo o Caminho ao Andar: Aportes introdutórios para a caracterização da Esquerda Latino-Americana no começo do século XXI. In: Soares de LimaMR (ed.) Desempenho de governos progressistas no Cone Sul: Agendas alternativas ao neoliberalismo. Rio de Janeiro: Edições IUPERJ, pp. 147–76.
12.
DewachterSMolenaersN (2011) Who takes a seat at the pro-poor table? Civil society participation in the Honduran Poverty Reduction Strategy. Latin American Research Review46(3): 112–32.
13.
DooleyMHutchisonM (2009) Transmission of the US subprime crisis to emerging markets: Evidence on the decoupling-recoupling hypothesis. Journal of International Money and Finance28(8): 1331–49.
14.
DrakeP (1992) Comment. In: DornbuschREdwardsS (eds) The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 35–40.
15.
EllnerS (2012) The distinguishing features of Latin America’s new left in power. Latin American Perspectives39(1): 96–114.
16.
GerringJ (2012) Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework, 2nd edn.New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GrandinG (2010) Honduras, Obama and the region’s new right. LASA Forum41(1): 8–11.
18.
HoffmannB (2009) Charismatic authority and leadership change: Lessons from Cuba’s post-Fidel succession. International Political Science Review30(3): 229–48.
KomivesK (2011) Institutionalizing social accountability? Participation and the PRS process in Bolivia, Honduras and Nicaragua. European Journal of Development Research23(2): 302–18.
22.
LanzaroJ (2007) Gobiernos de izquierda en América Latina: Entre el populismo y la social democracia – Una tipología para avanzar en el análisis comparado. Análises de Conjuntura OPSA3(12).
23.
LanzaroJ (2009) La social democracia criolla. Análises de Conjuntura OPSA5(3).
24.
LievesleyGLudlamS (eds) (2009) Reclaiming Latin America: Experiments in Radical Social Democracy. London and New York: Zed Books.
25.
LlanosMMarsteintredetL (2010a) Epilogue: The breakdown of Zelaya’s presidency: Honduras in comparative perspective. In: LlanosMMarsteintredetL (eds) Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 229–37.
26.
LlanosMMarsteintredetL (2010b) Ruptura y continuidad: La caída de «Mel» Zelaya en perspectiva comparada. América Latina Hoy55: 173–97.
27.
MezaV (2006) El caso de Honduras. In: Coloquio regional sobre los recientes procesos electorales en Centro América y sus consecuencias. San José, Costa Rica: Centro de Investigación y Adiestramento Político Administrativo. Available at: http://ciapa.org/pdf/Victor_Meza.pdf.
28.
MorenoI (2007) El Presidente en su laberinto (o en su ‘patastera’). Revista Envío305. Available at: http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/3622 (accessed 24 May 2011).
PayneJMZovattoDMateo DíazM (2007) Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America, expanded edn. Washington, DC: IDB.
34.
Paz AguilarE (2006) Honduras: Elecciones 2005. In: Coloquio regional sobre los recientes procesos electorales en Centro América y sus consecuencias. San José, Costa Rica: Centro de Investigación y Adiestramento Político Administrativo. Available at: http://www.ciapa.org/pdf/E_Paz.pdf.
35.
PeetzP (2009) ¿De hacendado a revolucionario? Mel Zelaya y el giro a la izquierda del gobierno hondureño. Iberoamericana9(33): 181–6.
36.
Pereira da SilvaF (2010) Esquerdas latino-americanas: Uma tipologia é possível?Oikos9(2): 121–40.
37.
Pereira da SilvaF (2011) Vitórias na crise: Trajetórias das esquerdas latino-americanas contemporâneas. Rio de Janeiro: Ponteio.
38.
Pérez FloresFKfuriR (2011) Aliança Bolivariana ou a integração como projeto hegemônico. In: VadellJCamposT (eds) Os novos rumos do regionalismo e as alternativas políticas na América do Sul. Belo Horizonte: PUC Minas, pp. 390–417.
39.
Pérez FloresFCunha FilhoCMCoelhoAL (2010) Participación ampliada y reforma del Estado: Mecanismos constitucionales de democracia participativa en Bolivia, Ecuador y Venezuela. Observatorio Social de América Latina11(27): 73–95.
40.
PirkerKNúñezO (2010) Cuatro hipótesis y un corolario en torno al golpe de estado en Honduras. Nostromo – Revista Crítica Latinoamericana3: 113–30.
41.
PitkinHF (1972) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
RobertsKM (1995) Neoliberalism and the transformation of populism in Latin America: The Peruvian case. World Politics48(1): 82–116.
43.
RusiñolP (2009) El oligarca que cambió de bando. Público2(637): 12.
44.
StokesSC (2001) Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
TarrowS (1994) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Taylor-RobinsonMM (2006) La política hondureña y las elecciones de 2005. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago)26(1): 114–26.
47.
Taylor-RobinsonMM (2009) Honduras: una mezcla de cambio y continuidad. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago)29(2): 471–89.
WeylandKMadridRLHunterW (eds) (2010) Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings, 1st edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
WilliamsonJ (1990) What Washington means by policy reform. In: WilliamsonJ (ed.) Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics (US). Available at: http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=486 (accessed 4 April 2012).
