What are the challenges to future democratization in states regarded as democratic? This study shows that some states that are traditionally regarded as democratic consist of political institutions in need of further democratization. On average, states that are classified as democratic have one or two institutional dimensions in need of further democratization. The main institutional dimensions in need of democratization are functions of government, rule of law, personal autonomy and individual rights. In order to investigate challenges to future democratization, the study presents a methodology that uses Freedom House Index and Polity Index in a new innovative way.
DiamondL (2002) Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy13(2): 21–35.
16.
EkmanJ (2009) Political participation and regime stability: a framework for analyzing hybrid regimes. International Political Science Review30(1): 7–31.
17.
FishkinJS (1995) The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
FurmanD (2007) The origins and elements of imitation democracies: political developments in the post-soviet space. Osteuropa: The Europe beyond EuropeAutumn: 205–44.
20.
GutmannAThompsonD (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
HadeniusA (1992) Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HadeniusATeorellJ (2005) Assessing alternative indices of democracy. Committee on Concepts and Methods – Working Paper Series No 6.
23.
HaerpferCWBernhagenPInglehartRFWelzelC (eds) (2009) Democratization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HeldD (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
HuntingtonSP (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
26.
JaggersKGurrT (1996) Polity III: Regime type and Political Authority 1800–1994. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
27.
Kohler-KochBRittbergerB (eds) (2007) Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
28.
KuzioT (2005) Regime type and politics in Ukraine under Kuchma. Communist and Post-Communist Studies38(2): 167–90.
29.
LevitskySWayLA (2002) The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy13(2): 51–65.
30.
LinzJJStepanA (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
McFaulM (2002) The fourth wave of democracy and dictatorship: noncooperative transitions in the postcommunist world. World Politics54(2): 212–44.
MorlinoL (2008a) Democracy and changes: how research tails reality. West European Politics31(1-2): 40–59.
34.
MorlinoL (2008b) Hybrid Regimes or Regimes in Transition. Working Paper 70. Madrid: FRIDE.
35.
MorlinoL (2009) Are there hybrid regimes? Or are they just an optical illusion?European Political Science Review1(2): 273–96.
36.
MunckGL (2007) Democracy studies: agendas, findings, challenges. In: Berg-SchlosserD (ed.) Democratization: The State of the Art. Opladen: Barbara Bidrich Publishers.
37.
MunckGL (2009) Measuring Democracy: A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
38.
MunckGLVerkuilenJ (2002) Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies35(1): 5–34.
39.
O’DonnellGSchmitterPC (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
SmithG (2005) Beyond the Ballot: 57 Democratic Innovations from Around the World. London: The Power Inquiry.
41.
SmithG (2009) Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
SmithGWalesC (2000) Citizens’ juries and deliberative democracy. Political Studies48(1): 51–63.
43.
SørensenG (1998) Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a Changing World. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44.
VanhanenT (1997) Prospects of Democracy: A Study of 172 States. London: Routledge.
45.
VanhanenT (2003) Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. London: Routledge.
46.
WardHNorvalALandmanTPrettyJ (2003) Open citizens’ juries and the politics of sustainability. Political Studies51(2): 282–99.
47.
WhiteS (2003) Rethinking postcommunist transition. Government and Opposition38(4): 417–35.
