Using data from the Global View 2004 survey, this research examines the extent to which the idea of creating a regional community in Northeast Asia is supported by Korean citizens, and investigates the determinants of public support for this novel idea. It finds that both widely adopted affective and utilitarian models of public support for regional integration have critical limitations in accounting for the proposed regional integration in Northeast Asia. It shows that security-related utilitarian factors have the greatest explanatory power. Finally, it is suggested that enhancing cooperation with China and Japan in unraveling security problems is necessary to initiate regional integration, especially in Northeast Asia.
Calder, Kent and Ye, Min (2004). "Regionalism and Critical Junctures: Explaining the `Organization Gap'," Journal of East Asian Studies4: 191-226.
2.
Chung, Ok-Nim (2000). "Solving the Security Puzzle in Northeast Asia: A Multilateral Security Regime," Washington DC: Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies, Brookings Institution.
3.
Cichowski, Rachel A. (2000). "Western Dreams, Eastern Realities: Support for the European Union in Central and Eastern Europe," Comparative Political Studies33: 1243-78.
4.
Deflem, Mathieu and Pampel, Fred C. (1996). "The Myth of Postnational Identity: Popular Support for European Unification," Social Forces75(1): 119-43.
5.
Ehin, Piret (2001). "Determinants of Public Support for EU Membership: Data from the Baltic Countries," European Journal of Political Research40(1): 31-56.
6.
Eichenberg, Richard C. and Dalton, Russell J. (1993). "Europeans and the European Community: The Dynamics of Public Support for European Integration," International Organization47(4): 507-34.
7.
Gabel, Matthew J. (1998). "Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories," Journal of Politics60(2): 333-54.
8.
Gabel, Matthew J. and Whitten, Guy D. (1997). "Economic Conditions, Economic Perceptions, and Public Support for European Integration," Political Behavior19(1): 81-96.
9.
Golob, Stephanie R. (2003). "Beyond the Policy Frontier: Canada, Mexico, and the Ideological Origins of NAFTA," World Politics55(3): 361-98.
10.
Hooghe, Liesbeth and Marks, Gary (2005). "Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration," European Union Politics2005(6): 419-43.
11.
Inglehart, Ronald (1970a). "Cognitive Mobilization and European Identity ," Comparative Politics3: 45-70.
12.
Inglehart, Ronald (1970b). "Public Opinion and Regional Integration," International Organization24(4): 764-95.
13.
Jain, Purnendra (2006). "Japan's Vision of an East Asian Community: Responses from Asia," Japanese Studies26(1): 1-4.
14.
Janssen, Joseph H. (1991). "Postmaterialism, Cognitive Mobilization, and Support for European Integration," British Journal of Political Science21: 443-68.
15.
Jones, Martin D. and Smith, Michael L.R. (2007). "Constructing Communities: The Curious Case of East Asian Regionalism," Review of International Studies33: 165-86.
16.
Kim, Jae Han (2005). Northeast Asian Community. Paju: Jipmoondang.
17.
Lee, Sanghwan (2004). "The Feasibility and the Limitations of Creating Northeast Asian Community," in National Security Graduate School (ed.), New Order of Northeast Asia. Seoul: Baeksan Soedang.
18.
Lee, Suhun (2006). "Korea's Initiative for the Peace and Prosperity of Northeast Asia," in Jaeju Development Institute and East Asian Institute (eds), Northeast Community: Discourse of Peace and Prosperity. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.
19.
Mclaren, Lauren M. (2004). "Opposition to European Integration and Fear of Loss of National Identity: Debunking a Basic Assumption Regarding Hostility to the Integration Project," European Journal of Political Research43(6): 895-911.
20.
Mahler, Vincent A., Taylor, Bruce J., and Wozniak, Jennifer R. (2000). "Economics and Public Support for the European Union: An Analysis at the National, Regional, and Individual Levels," Polity32(3): 429-53.
21.
Mennis, Bernard and Sauvant, Karl P. (1975). "Describing and Explaining Support for Regional Integration: An Investigation of German Business Elite Attitudes toward the European Community," International Organization29(4): 973-95.
22.
Munakata, Naoko (2006). "Transforming East Asia: The Evolution of Regional Economic Integration," Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
23.
Putnam, Robert D. (1988). "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games," International Organization42: 427-60.
24.
Risse, Thomas, Engelmann-Martin, Daniela, Knopf, Hans-Joachim, and Roscher, Klaus (1999). "To Euro or Not to Euro? The EMU and Identity Politics in the European Union," European Journal of International Relations5(2): 147-87.
25.
Sanchez-Cuenca, Ignacio (2000). "The Political Basis of Support for European Integration ," European Union Politics1(2): 147-71.
26.
Seligson, Mitchell A. (1999). "Popular Support for Regional Economic Integration in Latin America," Journal of Latin American Studies31: 129-50.
27.
Shioya, Takafusa (2006). "A Design for Cooperation and Building a Community in East Asia: Jeju Development Institute," in East Asia Foundation (ed.), Northeast Asian Community: Discourse on Peace and Prosperity. Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 193-201.
28.
Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., and Shabad, Goldie (2003). "Dynamics of Support for European Integration in Post-Communist Poland," European Journal of Political Research42(4): 503-39.
29.
Wu, Xinbo (2004). "US Security Policy in East Asia: Adjusting to a New Security Setting," in Asia Foundation (ed.), America's Role in Asia: American Views and America's Role in Asia. San Francisco, CA: Asia Foundation, URL (consulted 15 July 2008): http://www.asiafoundation.org.
30.
Yang, Jun Hee (2002). "History and Prospect for the Integration of Northeast Asia," in Manhak Kwon, (ed), Multidimensional Analysis of the Process of Regional Integration in Northeast Asia. Seoul: Kyonghee University Press.
31.
Ye, Min (2008). "Security Institutions in Northeast Asia: Multilateral Responses to Structural Changes," in Vinod K. Aggarwal and Min Gyo Koo, Asia's New Institutional Architecture: Evolving Structures for Managing Trade, Financial, and Security Relations. Berlin: Springer.
