This article explores the ideological dynamics of democratic regime change in South Korea from a comparative perspective. Analyzing national sample surveys conducted during the first decade of democratic rule, we find that the democratization of the country’s right-wing dictatorship has resulted in a movement of many South Koreans from the right to the left on the ideological spectrum. However, many of the South Koreans who have shifted their position on the spectrum have done so without changing their thinking about what “the left” and “the right” represent. This particular pattern of ideological dynamics that features change in identification, but continuity in content, confirms two distinct theories. As expected from the theory of democratic human development, democratization provided South Koreans with a wide array of legal rights allowing them to think freely. As expected from the theory of political socialization, however, the content of the thinking retains an old, authoritarian conception of rule. Unlike the democratization of political institutions, which can be achieved in a few years, the democratization of mass political thinking appears to be an intergenerational phenomenon that requires more than a decade for completion.
Andrews, F. , Morgan, J.N. and Gouquist, J.A. (1973). Multiple Classification Analysis. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan .
2.
Barnes, S.H. (1997). “Electoral Behavior and Comparative Politics,” in M.I. Lichback and A.S. Zuckerman (eds), Comparative Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press .
3.
Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
4.
Bunce, V. (2000). “Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations,”Comparative Political Studies33: 703-734 .
5.
Cho, H.Y. (2002). “Progressive-Conservative, Left-Right, and Pro-Reform-Antireform,”Media Today17 .
6.
Choi, J.J. (1993). “Political Cleavages in South Korea,” in H. Koo (ed.), State and Society in Contemporary Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University .
7.
Collier, R. (1999). Paths Toward Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press .
8.
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2001). CSES Module 1 (1996-2001). URL: http://www.umich.edu/%7Ecses/.
9.
Conover, P.J. and Feldman, S. (1981). “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identification,”American Journal of Political Science25: 617-645 .
10.
Dahl, R. (1998). On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
11.
Dalton, R.J. (1996). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Chatham: Chatham House .
12.
Dalton, R.J. (1998). “Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies,”Paper series, URL: http://www.democ.uci.edu/papers.htm.Irvine: Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California .
13.
Dalton, R.J. (2004). “Social Modernization and the End of Ideology Debate: Patterns of Ideological Polarization.” Paper presented at the Conference on Values and Beliefs, University of Tokyo, December.
14.
Diamond, L. (2003). “Universal Democracy,”Policy Review119: 3-25 .
15.
Evans, G. , Heath, A. and Lalljee, M. (1996). “Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian- Authoritarian Values in the British Electorate,”British Journal of Sociology47: 93-112 .
16.
Evans, J. (1997). “Political Ideology and Popular Beliefs about Class and Opportunity,”British Journal of Sociology48: 450-470 .
17.
Freedom House (2004). Freedom in the World Country Ratings. URL: http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/index.htm.
18.
Fuchs, D. and Klingemann, H. (1990). “The Left-Right Schema,” in M.K. Jenningset al. (eds), Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies. New York: Walter de Gruyter .
19.
George, V. (1998). “Political Ideology, Globalization and Welfare Futures in Europe,”Journal of Social Policy27: 16-37 .
20.
Ham, J.B. (2001). “Ideological Conflict Structure and History in Korea,”Gaegansasang (in Korean) 13(4): 7-22 .
21.
Hix, S. (1998). “Integrating Left and Right: Studying EU Politics,”ECSA Review9: 2-6 .
22.
Huber, J. (1989). “Values and Partisanship in Left-Right Orientations,”European Journal of Political Research17: 599-691 .
23.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
24.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
25.
Inglehart, R. and Baker, W. (2000). “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values,”American Sociological Review65: 19-55 .
26.
Jacoby, W. (1991). “Ideological Identification and Issue Attitudes,”American Journal of Political Science35: 178-205 .
27.
Kang, J.I. (1997). “Conservativeness and Progressiveness,” in J.I. Kang and S.W. Kim (eds), Edmund Burke and Conservatism (in Korean). Seoul: Munhakgua Jisung .
28.
Kang, W.T. (1998). “Voters’ Ideological Tendencies and Voting Behavior,” in N.Y. Lee (ed.), Korean Election II (in Korean). Seoul: Puruengil .
29.
Kim, H.M. and Fording, R.C. (1998). “Voter Ideology in Western Democracies,”European Journal of Political Research33: 73-97 .
30.
Kitschelt, H. (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
31.
Klingemann, H. (1979). “Measuring Ideological Conceptualization,” in S.H. Barneset al. (eds), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
32.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
33.
Lipset, S.M. (1991). “No Third Way: A Comparative Perspective on the Left,” in D. Chirot (ed.), The Crisis in Leninism and the Decline of the Left. Seattle: University of Washington Press .
34.
Lipset, S.M. (2001). “The Americanization of the European Left,”Journal of Democracy12: 14-87 .
35.
McDonough, P. , Barnes, S. and Lopez Pina, A.L. (1998). The Cultural Dynamics of Democratization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
36.
Maravall, J.M. and Przeworski, A. (2001). “Political Reactions to the Economy,” in S.C. Stokes (ed.), Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press .
37.
Moon, C.I . and Steinbert, D.I ., eds (1999). Kim Dae Jung Government and Sunshine Policy: Promises and Challenges. Seoul: Yonsei University Press .
38.
Morlino, L. and Montero, J.R. (1995). “Legitimacy and Democracy in Southern Europe,” in R. Gunther , P.N. Diamandouros and H. Puhle (eds), The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
39.
Nathan, A.J. and Shi, T. (1996). “Left and Right with Chinese Characteristics,”World Politics48: 522-550 .
40.
Pennings, P. (1998). “Party Responsiveness and Socio-Economic Problem-Solving in Western Democracies,”Party Politics4: 393-404 .
41.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
42.
Rose, R. , Mishler, W. and Haerpfer, C. (1998). Democracy and its Alternatives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
43.
Rosenberg, S. (1988). “The Structure of Political Thinking,”American Journal of Political Science32: 539-566 .
44.
Sears, D. and Funk, C. (1999). “Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adult’s Predisposition,”Journal of Politics61: 1-28 .
45.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press .
46.
Seo, H. (2002). “Lee Urges North to Apologize for Abductions.”Korea Herald, September 26.
47.
Sohn, H.C. (1990). “The Korean War and the Contours of Ideology.”Korea and International Politics (in Korean) 12: 1-27 .
48.
Suh, B. (2001). Kim Dae-Jung’s Engagement Policy and the South-South Conflict in South Korea: Implications for U.S. Policy. New York: Asia Society .
49.
Thomassen, J. (1995). “Support for Democratic Values,” in H. Klingemann and D. Fuchs (eds), Citizens and the State. New York: Oxford University Press .
50.
United Nations Development Program (2002). Human Development Reports. New York: Oxford University Press .
51.
Van der Brug, W. (1999). “Voters’ Perceptions and Party Dynamics,”Party Politics5: 147-169 .
52.
Weltman, D.B. (2001). “The Political Psychology of Contemporary Anti-Politics,”Political Psychology22: 367-382 .
53.
Welzel, C. , Inglehart, R. and Klingemann, H. (2003). “The Theory of Human Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis,”European Journal of Political Research42: 341-379 .
