Multiple studies in political science consistently hold that left-wing ideology renders individuals more prone to protest behavior. However, the familiar association between left-wing ideology and protesting is not empirically corroborated in all democratic nations. Building on existing theoretical principles and applying them to diverse political contexts, this article sheds light on puzzling variation in protest behavior across new and old democracies. It argues that it is not the left that engenders protest. Instead, we demonstrate that which political camp engages in protest behavior depends on its historical legacies and cultural liberalism. Historical legacies reflect the ideological configuration at democratization. Protesting tends to be more common in the ideological camp that opposed the pre-democratic political order. Simultaneously, it is culturally liberal individuals who more likely embrace protest participation, independent of their left–right identification. These theoretical expectations are supported through survey data analyses, explaining contrasting inter- and intra-regional variation in European democracies.
AbadieA.AtheyS.ImbensG.WooldridgeJ. (2017). When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? (Arxiv:1710.02926 [econ, math, stat]). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02926
2.
AchenC. H.BartelsL. M. (2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AiC.NortonE. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80, 123-129. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6
4.
BakkerR.JollyS.PolkJ. (2012). Complexity in the European party space: Exploring dimensionality with experts. European Union Politics, 13, 219-245. doi:10.1177/1465116512436995
5.
BarnesS. H.KaaseM.AllerbeckK. R.FarahB. G.HeunksF.InglehartR.. . . RosenmayrL. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
BarnesS. H.SimonJ. (1998). The postcommunist citizen. Budapest, Hungary: Erasmus Foundation.
7.
BartusT. (2005). Estimation of marginal effects using margeff. The Stata Journal, 5, 309-329.
8.
BernhagenP.MarshM. (2007). Voting and protesting: Explaining citizen participation in old and new European democracies. Democratization, 14, 44-72. doi:10.1080/13510340601024298
9.
BlaisA.BlakeD.DionS. (1993). Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 40-62. doi:10.2307/2111523
10.
CarejaR.EmmeneggerP. (2009). The politics of public spending in post-communist countries. East European Politics and Societies, 23, 165-184. doi:10.1177/0888325408328748
11.
ClarkW. R.GolderM.GolderS. N. (2002). Fiscal policy and the democratic process in the European union. European Union Politics, 3, 205-230. doi:10.1177/1465116502003002004
12.
CofféH.LippeT. V. D. (2010). Citizenship norms in Eastern Europe. Social Indicators Research, 96, 479-496. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9488-8
13.
DaltonR. J. (1988). Citizen politics in Western democracies: Public opinion and political parties in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany, and France. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
14.
DaltonR. J. (2006). Social modernization and the end of ideology debate: Patterns of ideological polarization. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 7, 1-22. doi:10.1017/S1468109905002045
15.
DaltonR. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76-98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x
16.
DaltonR. J.WelzelC. (2014). Political culture and value change. In DaltonR. J.WelzelC. (Eds.), The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens (pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17.
de VriesC. E.HakhverdianA.LanceeB. (2013). The dynamics of voters’ left/right identification: The role of economic and cultural attitudes. Political Science Research and Methods, 1, 223-238. doi:10.1017/psrm.2013.4
18.
DöringH.ManowP. (2016). Parliaments and Governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies (Development version). Available from http://www.parlgov.org/
19.
EkiertG.HansonS. E. (2003). Introduction. In EkiertG.HansonS. E. (Eds.), Capitalism and democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the legacy of communist rule (pp. 1-11). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
EkiertG.KubikJ. (1998). Contentious politics in new democracies: East Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia, 1989-93. World Politics, 50, 547-581. doi:10.1017/S004388710000736X
21.
European Social Survey. (2016). European Social Survey cumulative file, ESS 1-7 (Data file edition 1.0). Bergen, Norway: NSD–Norwegian Centre for Research Data.
22.
European Value Survey. (2015). European Values Study longitudinal data file 1981-2008 (EVS 1981-2008) (Version 3.0.0).Cologne, Germany: GESIS Data Archive. doi:10.4232/1.12253
23.
FairfieldT.GarayC. (2017). Redistribution under the right in Latin America: Electoral competition and organized actors in policymaking. Comparative Political Studies, 50, 1871-1906. doi:10.1177/0010414017695331
24.
FedericoC. M.FisherE. L.DeasonG. (2017). The authoritarian left withdraws from politics: Ideological asymmetry in the relationship between authoritarianism and political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 79, 1010-1023. doi:10.1086/692126
25.
Grzymala-BusseA. M. (2002). Redeeming the communist past: The regeneration of communist parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GurinD.PetryF.CrteJ. (2004). Tolerance, protest and democratic transition: Survey evidence from 13 post-communist countries. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 371-395. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00158.x
27.
GurrT. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
HoogheL.MarksG.WilsonC. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies, 35, 965-989. doi:10.1177/001041402236310
29.
HoogheM.QuintelierE. (2014). Political participation in European countries: The effect of authoritarian rule, corruption, lack of good governance and economic downturn. Comparative European Politics, 12, 209-232. doi:10.1057/cep.2013.3
30.
HuntingtonS. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late 20th century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
31.
HutterS.KriesiH. (2013). Movements of the left, movements of the right reconsidered. In van StekelenburgJ.RoggebandC.KlandermansB. (Eds.), The future of social movement research: Dynamics, mechanisms, and processes (pp. 281-298). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
InglehartR. (1977). Silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
InglehartR. (1979). Political action: The impact of values, cognitive level, and social background. In BarnesS. H.et al. (Eds.), Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies (pp. 306-343). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
InglehartR. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
InglehartR.CatterbergG. (2002). Trends in political action: The developmental trend and the post-honeymoon decline. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43, 300-316. doi:10.1177/002071520204300305
36.
JakobsenT. G.ListhaugO. (2014). Social change and the politics of protest. In DaltonR. J.WelzelC. (Eds.), The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens (pp. 213-239). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37.
JouW.DaltonR. J. (2017). Left-right orientations and voting behavior. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.581
38.
JowittK. (1992). New world disorder: The Leninist extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
Karaca-MandicP.NortonE. C.DowdB. (2012). Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Services Research, 47, 255-274. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x
40.
KitscheltH. (1992). The formation of party systems in East Central Europe. Politics & Society, 20, 7-50. doi:10.1177/0032329292020001003
41.
KitscheltH. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
KitscheltH.MansfeldovaZ.MarkowskiR.TokaG. (1999). Post-communist party systems: Competition, representation, and inter-party cooperation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
KlingemannH.-D. (1979). Ideological conceptualization and political action. In S. H.et al. (Eds.), Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies (pp. 279-304). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
KlingemannH.-D.FuchsD.ZielonkaJ. (2006). Introduction: Support for democracy and autocracy in Eastern Europe. In KlingemannH.-D.FuchsD.ZielonkaJ. (Eds.), Democracy and political culture in Eastern Europe (pp. 1-22). London, England: Routledge.
KostelkaF. (2014). The state of political participation in post-communist democracies: Low but surprisingly little biased citizen engagement. Europe-Asia Studies, 66, 945-968. doi:10.1080/09668136.2014.905386
47.
KostelkaF. (2015). To mobilise and demobilise: The puzzling decline of voter turnout in post-communist democracies (Doctoral thesis, Instituts d’études politiques, Paris, France). Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2015IEPP0022
48.
KostelkaF. (2017). Does democratic consolidation lead to a decline in voter turnout? Global evidence since 1939. American Political Science Review, 111, 653-667. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000259
49.
KuranT. (1991). Now out of never: The element of surprise in the East European revolution of 1989. World Politics, 44, 7-48. doi:10.2307/2010422
50.
LetkiN. (2004). Socialization for participation? Trust, membership, and democratization in East-Central Europe. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 665-679. doi:10.2307/3219827
51.
MarksG.HoogheL.NelsonM.EdwardsE. (2006). Party competition and European integration in the east and west: Different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 155-175. doi:10.1177/0010414005281932
52.
MarshA. (1977). Protest and political consciousness. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53.
MasonD. S. (1995). Attitudes toward the market and political participation in the postcommunist states. Slavic Review, 54, 385-406.
54.
MayerN. (2004). Le temps des manifestations [The Era of Demonstrations]. European Journal of Social Sciences, XLII-129, 219-224. doi:10.4000/ress.410
55.
MayerN. (2010). Sociologie des comportements politiques [Sociology of Political Behavior]. Paris, France: Armand Colin.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2777934
58.
MillerR. F. (1992). Concluding essay. In MillerR. F. (Ed.), The development of civil society in communist systems (pp. 130-147). Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
59.
MokkenR. J. (2011). A theory and procedure of scale analysis: With applications in political research. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110813203 (Original work published 1971)
60.
MoodC. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26, 67-82. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp006
61.
NorrisP. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
NovýM. (2014). Electoral and non-electoral participation in the Visegrad countries: Complements or substitutes?East European Politics and Societies, 28, 863-886. doi:10.1177/0888325414532496
63.
O’DonnellG.SchmitterP. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule, vol. 4: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
64.
PolkJ.RovnyJ.BakkerR.EdwardsE.HoogheL.JollyS.. . . ZilovicM. (2017). Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research & Politics, 4(1), 1-9. doi:10.1177/2053168016686915
65.
Pop-ElechesG.TuckerJ. A. (2010, September2-5). After the party: Legacies and left-right distinctions in post-communist countries. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
66.
Pop-ElechesG.TuckerJ. A. (2013). Associated with the past? Communist legacies and civic participation in post-communist countries. East European Politics and Societies, 27, 45-68. doi:10.1177/0888325412465087
67.
Pop-ElechesG.TuckerJ. A. (2017). Communism’s shadow: Historical legacies and contemporary political attitudes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
QuarantaM. (2015). Political protest in Western Europe: Exploring the role of context in political action. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
69.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York, NY: Longman.
70.
RovnyJ. (2014). Communism, federalism, and ethnic minorities: Explaining party competition patterns in Eastern Europe. World Politics, 66, 669-708. doi:10.1017/S0043887114000227
71.
RovnyJ. (2015). Party competition structure in Eastern Europe aggregate uniformity versus idiosyncratic diversity?East European Politics and Societies, 29, 40-60. doi:10.1177/0888325414567535
72.
RovnyJ.EdwardsE. E. (2012). Struggle over dimensionality party competition in Western and Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies, 26, 56-74. doi:10.1177/0888325410387635
73.
RuchtD. (2007). The spread of protest politics. In DaltonR. J.KlingemannH.-D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 708-720). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
RueschemeyerD.StephensE. H.HuberE.StephensJ. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
75.
StockemerD. (2014). What drives unconventional political participation? A two level study. The Social Science Journal, 51, 201-211. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2013.10.012
76.
SztompkaP. (1993). Civilizational incompetence: The trap of post-communist societies. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 22, 85-95.
77.
SztompkaP. (1996). Looking back: The year 1989 as a cultural and civilizational break. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 29, 115-129. doi:10.1016/S0967-067X(96)80001-8
78.
TǎtarM. I. (2015). Selective or generic activism? Types of participants, political action repertoires and mobilisation capacity in a post-communist society. Europe-Asia Studies, 67, 1251-1281. doi:10.1080/09668136.2015.1075191
79.
TavitsM.LetkiN. (2009). When left is right: Party ideology and policy in post-communist Europe. American Political Science Review, 103, 555-569. doi:10.1017/S0003055409990220
80.
TillyC. (1975). Revolutions and collective violence. In GreensteinF. I.PolsbyN. W. (Eds.), Handbook of political science: Macropolitical theory (Vol. 3, pp. 483-555). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
81.
TillyC. (1983). Speaking your mind without elections, surveys, or social movements. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 461-478. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2748659
82.
TorcalM.RodonT.HierroM. J. (2016). Word on the street: The persistence of leftist-dominated protest in Europe. West European Politics, 39, 326-350. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1068525
83.
VachudovaM. A.HoogheL. (2009). Postcommunist politics in a magnetic field: How transition and EU accession structure party competition on European integration. Comparative European Politics, 7, 179-212. doi:10.1057/cep.2008.9
84.
van de MeerT.van DethJ. W.ScheepersP. L. H. (2009). The politicized participant: Ideology and political action in 20 democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 1426-1457. doi:10.1177/0010414009332136
85.
VanhuysseP. (2006). Divide and pacify: Strategic social policies and political protests in post-communist democracies. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.
86.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics (Abridged Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87.
VráblíkováK. (2014). How context matters? Mobilization, political opportunity structures, and nonelectoral political participation in old and new democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 203-229. doi:10.1177/0010414013488538
88.
WittenbergJ. (2015). Conceptualizing historical legacies. East European Politics and Societies, 29, 366-378. doi:10.1177/0888325415577864
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
