By documenting types of foreign policy role empirically, a calculus is presented for ascertaining the nature of power-role gaps (misalignment) in contemporary world politics. As states rise or decline on their power cycles, power-role gaps emerge because of an inherent inertia in adjusting roles and responsibilities. Such gaps often remain a non-issue until squeezed to the surface of statecraft at critical points where expectations regarding future security change massively and abruptly. Power cycle theory requires mitigation of role-power gaps before they intensify (power-role equilibrium) as part of a broader conception of “dynamic equilibrium” to ensure security amidst structural change.
Art, R.J. (1998/99). “Geopolitics Updated: The Strategy of Selected Engagement.”International Security, 23(3): 79-113.
2.
Cipolla, C.M. (1970). The Economic Decline of Empires. London: Methuen.
3.
Christopher, W. (1997). “Investing in American Leadership.” Address at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, January 15, us Department of State Dispatch (January 1997): 1.
4.
DeGrasse, R.W. Jr (1983). Military Expansion, Economic Decline: The Impact of Military Spending on us Economic Decline. Armonk, ny: M. E. Sharpe.
5.
Doran, C.F. (1989). “Systemic Disequilibrium, Foreign Policy Role, and the Power Cycle.”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 33: 371-401.
6.
Doran, C.F. (1991). Systems in Crisis: New Imperatives of High Politics at Century's End. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Doran, C.F. (2000). “Confronting the Principles of the Power Cycle.” In Handbook of War Studies II (M.I. Midlarsky, ed.), 332-368. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
Finnemore, M. and K. Sikkink (1998). “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.”International Organization, 52: 891-892.
9.
Florini, A. (1996). “The Evolution of International Norms.”International Studies Quarterly, 40 (3): 363-389.
10.
Foreign Broadcast Information Service [cd-rom version], 1992-1997.
11.
Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Haass, R.N. (1999). “What to Do With American Primacy,”Foreign Affairs, 78(5): 37-49.
13.
Hillen, J. (1997). “Superpowers Don't Do Windows.”Orbis, 41: 241-257.
14.
Hillen, J. (1998). Future Visions for us Defense Policy: Four Alternatives Presented As Presidential Speeches. Washington, dc: The Brookings Institution Press.
15.
Holsti, K.J. (1970) “National Role Conception in the Study of Foreign Policy.”International Studies Quarterly, 14: 233-309.
16.
Huntington, S.P. (1999). “The Lonely Superpower.”Foreign Affairs, 78(2): 35-49.
17.
Ikenberry, G.J. (1998/99). “Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order.”International Security, 23(3): 43-78.
18.
International Energy Agency (1997). Energy Balances of oecd Countries, 1994-1995. Paris: iea.
19.
International Institute for Strategic Studies (1998). The Military Balance, 1997/98. London: iiss.
20.
Kapstein, E.B. (1992). The Political Economy of Global Security: A Global Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Keohane, R.O. (1986). “Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond.” In Neorealism and Its Critics (R. Keohane, ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Keohane, R.O. and J. Nye (1977). Power and Interdependence. Boston, ma: Little, Brown.
23.
Knoor, K. (1970). Military Power and Potential. Lexington, ma: Heath Lexington Books.
24.
Krasner, S.D. (1994). “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences.” In International Organization: A Reader (F. Kratochwil and E.D. Mansfield, eds). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
25.
Krauthammer, C. (1990/91). “The Unipolar Moment.”Foreign Affairs, 70(1): 23-33.
26.
Landes, D.S. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. New York: W.W. Norton.
27.
Layne, C. (1997). “From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy.”International Security, 22(1): 86-124.
28.
Lehneman, William J. (1999) “Anchoring American Foreign Policy in the Absence of a Clear and Present Danger.”phd dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, md.
29.
Lieberman, S. (1965). “The Effects of Changes in Roles on the Attitudes of Role Occupants.” In Human Behavior and International Politics (J.D. Singer, ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally.
30.
National Security Council (1997). A National Security Strategy for a New Century. Washington, dc: nsc (May).
31.
Nitze, P.H. (1956). “Arms, Strategy, and Policy.”Foreign Affairs (January): 187-198.
32.
Nye, J.S. Jr (1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Organski, A.F.K. (1968). World Politics. New York: Knopf.
34.
Organski, A.F.K. and J. Kugler (1980). The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Rosenau, J.N. (1969). Linkage Politics: Essays on the Convergence of National and International Systems. New York: The Free Press.
36.
Ruggie, J.G. (1998). “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.”International Organization, 52: 855-885.
37.
Snyder, G.H. (1997). Alliance Politics. Ithaca, ny: Cornell University Press.
38.
us Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (1997). World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers, 1996. Washington, dc.
39.
us Department of Defense (1995). Joint Vision 2010—America's Military: Preparing for Tomorrow. Washington, dc: dod.
40.
us Department of Defense (1997). Report of the Quadrennial Defense Review. Washington, dc: dod (May).
41.
us Department of Defense (1993). The Bottom-Up Review: Forces for a New Era. Washington, dc: dod.
42.
us Department of Defense (1988). The Future Security Environment, Andrew W. Marshall and Charles Wolf. Washington, dc: dod (October).
43.
us Department of State (1992/7). us Department of State Dispatch. Washington, dc, 1992-1997.
44.
Wilkinson, D. (1999). “Unipolarity Without Hegemony.”International Studies Review, 1(2): 141-172.
45.
Wills, G. (1999). “Bully of the Free World.”Foreign Affairs, 78(2): 50-59.
46.
Wohlforth, W.C. (1999). “The Stability of a Unipolar World.”International Security, 24(1): 5-41.
47.
World Bank (1992). World Tables. Washington, dc.
48.
World Bank (1998). World Development Indicators, 1997. Washington, dc.
