Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Globalization entails the development of a set of transnational organizations, and these are becoming major arbiters of power and policies. These organizations are headed by elites and thus, in addition to national elites, we now have a second layer of transnational elites. This article examines the linkages between such elites and the public in two organizations: the International Monetary Fund and the European Union. Its argument is that such links, or couplings, between elites and the public are of crucial importance to democracy, and to progress toward a more egalitarian distribution of socio-economic resources. Further, it documents a series of deficits in elite-public linkages in the two organizations analyzed. When linkages are deficient this means that democracy in these transnational organizations is flawed as well. Concomitantly, and partly because of the same inadequacy in their coupling with the public, these elites are also instrumental in increasing socio-economic inequalities.

Keywords

Coupling Elites Globalization Linkages Transnational organizations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beetham, D. and C. Lord (1998). Legitimacy and the European Union. London: Longman.

Brecher, J. and T. Costello (1994). Global Village or Global Pillage. Boston: South End Press.

Brown, G. (1998). “Statement by the Governor of the Fund and Alternate Governor of the Bank for the uk.”IMF Summary Proceedings, Annual Meeting 1998, 237-244. Washington, dc.

Camdessus, M. (1998). “Presentation of the Fifty Third Annual Report by the Chairman of the Executive Board and Managing Director of the imf.”IMF Summary Proceedings, Annual Meeting 1998, 20-30 Washington, dc.

Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1993). The Elite Connection. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Etzioni-Halevy, E. (ed.) (1997). Classes and Elites in Democracy and Democratization. New York: Garland Publishers.

Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1999). “Elites, Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in Ultramodern Society.”International Review of Sociology, 9 (2): 239-250.

Euro 1999 (1998). European Commission, Luxembourg.

Eurobarometer (1999, 2000), 50, 51, 52, on-line. European Commission, Brussels.

10.

European Communities (1986). “Report on a Third Series of Local Consultations Held in European Countries.”Luxembourg: European Communities.

11.

Eurostatistics (July 1999). Luxembourg: European Communities.

12.

Field G. L. and J. Highley (1997). “National Elite Configurations and Transition to Democracy.” In Classes and Elites in Democracy and Democratization ( E. Etzioni-Halevy , ed.). New York: Garland Publishers.

13.

Franklin, M. (1996). “European Elections and the European Voter.” In European Union: Power and Policy Making ( J. J. Richardson , ed.), 187-199. London: Routledge.

14.

Hayes-Renshaw, F. and H. Wallace (1997). The Council of Ministers. London: Macmillan.

15.

International Monetary Fund Annual Report and Summary of Proceedings 1998 (1998). imf, Washington, dc.

16.

Jones, R. E. (1996). The Politics and Economics of the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

17.

Kirchner, E. J. (1996). “The Social Framework of the European Union.” In The European Union Encyclopedia and Directory (2nd edn). Era Publications.

18.

Kreppel, A. (1999). “Rules, Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Past, Present and Future.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Atlanta, 2-5 September.

19.

Ladrech, R. (1999). “Political Parties and the Problem of Legitimacy in the eu.” In Legitimacy and the European Union ( T. Banchoff and M. P. Smith , eds). London: Routledge.

20.

Lini, M. (1996). The European Commission. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

21.

Lord, C. (1998). Democracy in the European Union. Sheffield: Academic Press.

22.

Mash, R. (1999). “Organizational Patterns of Privatized Enterprises as a Function of Instrumental Rationalism Ideology.” phD dissertation, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan.

23.

Pakulski, J. (2000). “Responsive or Responsible Elites.” Paper presented at the ipsa xviii World Congress, Québec.

24.

Pauly, L. W. (1997). Who Elected the Bankers? Ithaca, ny: Cornell University Press.

25.

Persitz, R. (1999). “The International Monetary Fund: The Emperor is Naked.”Ha'aretz, 25(4): col. 4.

26.

Peters, G. (1996). “Agenda Setting in the European Union.” In European Union: Power and Policy Making ( J. J. Richardson , ed.), 61-76. London: Routledge.

27.

Rottenstorfer, W. (1998). “Opening Address by the Chairman of the Board of Governors and the Governor of the Fund and the Bank for Austria.”IMF Summary Proceedings, Annual Meeting 1998, 13-19. Washington, dc.

28.

Statistics in Focus (1999).

29.

Sklair, L. (2001). The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.

30.

Smith, M. P. (1999). “eu Legitimacy and the `Defensive Reaction' to the Single European Market.” In Legitimacy and the European Union ( T. Banchoff and M. P. Smith , eds). London: Routledge.

Linkage Deficits in Transnational Politics

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References