Building on the economic voting literature, the article hypothesizes that support for democratic reformers in a post-Soviet society can be expected to vary with economic conditions and also with where the country is in the transition process. Using a series of nine repeated surveys covering the time span from 1991 to 1999 in the Russian Federation, it tests both a reward-punishment hypothesis and a “price of reform” hypothesis. Among the best predictors of positive evaluations of President Yeltsin are time in the transition process (early in the process rather than late) and positive outlooks about the economic prospects for one's own family. Yet, political evaluation measures are found to have equal importance in understanding the dynamics of democratic support. In evaluating support for the opposition, the article finds that support for the Communist Party is directly related to negative economic evaluations, to experience with severe hardship, and to low monthly income.
Alvarez, R.M. , J. Nagler, and J.R. Willette (2000). “Measuring the Relative Impact of Issues and the Economy in Democratic Elections.”Electoral Studies, 19: 237-253.
2.
Anderson, C.J. and K.M. O'Connor (2000). “System Change, Learning, and Public Opinion about the Economy.”British Journal of Political Science, 30 (1): 147-172.
3.
Bloom, H.S. and D.H. Price (1975). “Voter Response to Short-Run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effect of Properity and Recession.”American Political Science Review, 69: 1240-1254.
4.
Clagget, W. (1986). “A Reexamination of the Asymmetry Hypothesis: Economic Expansion, Contradictions and Congressional Election.”Western Political Quarterly, 39: 621-633.
5.
Colton, T.J. (1996). “Economics and Voting in Russia.”Post-Soviet Affairs, 12(4): 289-318.
6.
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
7.
Duch, R. (1993). “Tolerating Economic Reform: Popular Support for Transition to a Free Market in the Former Soviet Union.”American Political Science Review, 87: 590-608.
8.
Duch, R. (1995). “Economic Chaos and the Fragility of Democratic Transition in Former Communist Regimes,”Journal of Politics, 37(1): 121-158.
9.
Evans, G. (1999). “Economics and Politics Revisited: Exploring the Decline in Conservative Support, 1992-1995.”Political Studies, XLVII, 139-151.
10.
Evans, G. and S. Whitefield (1995). “The Politics and Economics of Democratic Commitment: Support for Democracy in Transition Society.”British Journal of Political Science, 25: 485-514.
11.
Fidrmuc, J. (2000). “Economics of Voting in Post-communist Countries.”Electoral Studies, 19: 199-217.
12.
Fiorina, M.P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Firebaugh, G. (1997). “Analyzing Repeated Surveys.” Sage University Papers, Series on Quanitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Gamble, A. (1996). “The Legacy of Thatcherism.” In The Blair Agenda (M. Perryman, ed.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
15.
Hibbs, D. (1987). The American Political Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Kiewiet, D.R. (1983). Macroeconomics and Micropolitics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Kim, B. and S. Sidorenko-Stephenson (1999). “Economic Experience and Market Commitment in the 1996 Russian Presidential Election.”Europe-Asia Studies, 51(3): 467-482.
18.
Kinder, D.R. and D. R. Kiewiet (1979). “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: the Role of Personal Grieviances and Collective Economic Judgements in Congressional Voting.”American Journal of Political Science, 23: 495-527.
19.
Kinder, D.R. and D.R. Kiewiet (1981). “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.”British Journal of Political Science, 11: 129-141.
20.
Kitschelt, H. (1992). “The Formation of Party System in East Central Europe.”Politics and Society, 20, 7-50.
21.
Kuklinski, J.H. and D.M. West (1981). “Economic expectations and voting behavior in United States Senate and House elections.”American Political Science Review, 75: 436-447.
22.
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1986). “Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy.”American Journal of Political Science, 30: 315-346.
23.
Lewis-Beck, M.S. , H. Norpoth, and J.D. Lafay (eds.) (1991). Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
24.
Lewis-Beck, M.S. and M. Paldam (2000). “Economic Voting: An Introduction,”Electoral Studies, 19(2/3): 113-122.
25.
MacKuen, M.B. , R.S. Erickson, and J.A. Stimson (1992). “Peasants or Bankers?: The American Electorate and the US Economy.”American Political Science Review, 86: 597-611.
26.
Mason, D. and S. Sidorenko-Stephenson (1998). “Public Opinion and the 1996 Elections in Russia: Nostalgic and Statist, yet Pro-Market and Pro-Yeltsin.”Slavic Review, 56: 699-717.
27.
Mattila, M. (1996). “Economic Changes and Government Popularity in Scandinavian Countries.”British Journal of Political Science, 26: 583-600.
28.
Miller, A. , V. L. Hesli, and W. M. Reisinger (1994). “Reassessing Mass Support for Political and Economic Change in the Former USSR.”American Political Science Review, 88: 399-411.
29.
Miller, W. L. , S. White, and P. Heywoods (1998). Values and Political Change in Post-Communist Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.
30.
Powell, G. and G. Whitten (1993). “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.”American Journal of Political Science, 37: 391-414.
31.
Price, S. and D. Sanders (1993). “Modeling Government Popularity in Post-war Britain: A Methodological Example.”American Journal of Political Science, 37: 317-334.
32.
Rutland, P. (1995). “Privatization in East Europe: Another Case of Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail.”Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems (S.T. Murray, ed.). University of Iowa, Vol.5, No. 1.
33.
Sanders, D. (1991). “Government Popularity and the Next General Election.”Political Quarterly, 62: 235-261.
34.
Sanders, D. (1996). “Economic Performance, Management Competence and the Outcome of the Next General Election.”Political Studies, 44: 203-231.
35.
Sanders, D. (1999). “Conservative Incompetence, Labour Responsibility and the Feelgood Factor: Why the Economy Failed to Save the Conservatives in 1997.”Electoral Studies, 18: 251-270.
36.
Shlapentokh, V. (1999). “Will Russia Pass the Democratic Test in 2000?”The Washington Quarterly, 22(3): 55-66.
37.
Stevenson, R. (1999). “Contextual Effects in Policy-Oriented Models of Economic Voting.” Paper presented at the 1999 Joint Sessions of Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Science Research.
38.
Stokes, S. (1996). “Economic Reform and Public Opinion in Peru, 1990-1995.”Comparative Political Studies, 29(5): 544-565.
39.
Whitten, G.D. and H.D. Palmer (1998). “Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting.”Electoral Studies, 18: 49-67.
40.
Wickham-Jones, M. (1995). “Anticipating Social Democracy, Pre-empting Social Democracy.”Politics and Society, 23: 465-494.
41.
Wilmoth, J.R. (1990). “Variation in Vital Rates by Age, Period, and Cohort.” In Sociological Methodology (C.C. Clogg, ed.), pp. 295-336. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
