This paper reads Adorno’s engagement with Husserlian phenomenology as a resource for recent discussions on phenomenology and social critique. Transcendental phenomenology’s inability to develop an adequate account of society, according to Adorno, comes from its methodological compulsion to ground this knowledge in first principles. This leads it to produce a socially necessary illusion of society as a harmonious community of monads. If this ‘first philosophy’ produces an inverted image of society, however, learning to see the resulting pseudos is a task for which there is no step-by-step formula. In contrast to Husserl’s construction of society as a harmonious community of monads, Adorno’s critical theory sees society as a negative totality, and he claims that doing justice to this contradictory social object involves breaking the compulsion to system and method as philosophical guidelines. After outlining how Husserl’s conception of method reflects in his account of society, we will review Adorno’s criticism of this aspect of transcendental phenomenology. We will close with a consideration of Adorno’s conception of ‘last philosophy’: a fragmentary project that works to disclose the negative totality through a conceptual reflection on the individual moments composing it.
AdornoTheodor W.1970a [1956]. Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie. Suhrkamp. (GS 5).
3.
AdornoTheodor W.1976 [1969]. “Introduction,” in The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, pp. 1–67. Translated by Glyn Adey and David Frisby. Harper & Row.
4.
AdornoTheodor W.1977 [1931]. “The Actuality of Philosophy.” Telos31: 120–133.
5.
AdornoTheodor W.1983 [1955]. Prisms. Translated by Shierry Weber Nicholsen and Samuel Weber. MIT Press.
6.
AdornoTheodor W.1991[1958]. TheEssay as Form. In: Rolf Tiedemann (ed). Notes to Literature, Volume One. Translated by ShierryWeber Nicholsen. Columbia University Press, 3–23.
7.
AdornoTheodor W.2000 [1968]. Introduction to Sociology. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford University Press.
AdornoTheodor W.2005 [1962]. “Why Still Philosophy.” In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords, Translated by Henry Pickford, pp. 5–17. Columbia University Press.
10.
AdornoTheodor W.2013 [1956]. Against Epistemology: A Metacritique. Translated by Willis Domingo. Polity Press.
11.
Al-SajiAlia. 2017. “Feminist Phenomenology,” in Routledge Companion to Feminist Philosophy, edited by GarryAnnKhaderSerene J.StoneAlison, 143-154. Routledge.
12.
AldeaAndreea Smaranda. 2016. “Phenomenology as Critique: Teleological–Historical Reflection and Husserl’s Transcendental Eidetics.” Husserl Studies32: 21–46.
13.
AldeaAndreea SmarandaCarrDavidHeinämaaSara. 2022. Phenomenology as Critique: Why Method Matters. Routledge.
14.
AntichPeter. 2023. “Mitigating Tensions between Phenomenology and Critique.” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology6, no. 2: 6–23.
15.
BabichBabette. 2014. “Adorno’s Radio Phenomenology: Technical Reproduction, Physiognomy and Music.” Philosophy and Social Criticism40, no. 10: 957–996.
16.
BedorfThomas. 2017. “Kritische Theorie,” in Husserl Handbuch. Leben-Werk-Wirkung, edited by LuftSebastianWehrleMaren, 332-336. Metzler.
17.
BenjaminWalter.2019[1927]. Origin of the German Trauerspiel. Translated by Howard Eiland. Harvard University Press.
18.
Braunstein, Dirk. 2023 [2011]. Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy. Translated by Adam Baltner. Haymarket Books.
19.
Buck-MorssSusan. 1977. The Origin of Negative Dialectics: Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamn, and the Frankfurt Institute. The Free Press.
20.
CarrDavid (2022) Phenomenology as Critical Method: Experience and Practice. In: AldeaAndreea SmarandaCarrDavidHeinämaaSara (eds). Phenomenology as Critique: Why Method Matters,. Routledge, 9–24.
21.
De SchryverCarmen. 2022. “Empirical-Anthropological Types and Absolute Ideas: Tracking Husserl’s Eurocentrism.” Husserl Studies38: 359–383.
22.
Ferencz-FlatzChristian. 2023. Critical Theory and Phenomenology. Polemics, Appropriations, Perspectives. Springer.
23.
GuentherLisa. 2020. “Six Senses of Critique for Critical Phenomenology.” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology4, no. 2: 5–23.
24.
HusserlEdmund. 1959. Husserliana: Edmund Husserl – Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 43, Series Editor: Julia Jansen. Springer.
25.
HusserlEdmund. 1960 [1929]. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorion Cairns. Martinus Nijhoff. (Hua I).
26.
HusserlEdmund. 1970a [1936]. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated by David Carr. Northwestern University Press. (Hua VI).
27.
HusserlEdmund. 1970b [1900-1901]. Logical Investigations, Volume 1. Translated by J. N. Findlay. Routledge. (Hua XX.1-2).
28.
HusserlEdmund. 1999 [1907]. The Idea of Phenomenology. Translated by Lee Hardy. Kluwer. (Hua II).
29.
HusserlEdmund. 2014 [1913]. Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. First Volume: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Hackett. (Hua III).
30.
HusserlEdmund. 2019 [1923-1924]. First Philosophy: Lectures 1923/24, and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920-1925). Springer. (Hua VIII).
31.
KaneBrian. 2016. “Phenomenology, Physiognomy, and the ‘Radio Voice’.” New German Critique129: 91–112.
32.
Laferté-CoutuMérédith. 2021. “What is Phenomenological About Critical Phenomenology? Guenther, Al-Saji, and the Husserlian Account of Attitudes.” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology4, no. 2: 89–106.
33.
LevinasEmmanuel. 1969 [1961]. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Duquesne University Press.
MillerJared A.2009. “Phenomenology’s Negative Dialectic: Adorno’s Critique of Husserl’s Epistemological Foundationalism.” The Philosophical Forum40: 99–125.
36.
Müller-DoohmStefan. 2005 [2003]. Adorno: A Biography. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. Polity Press.
37.
NelsonEric. 2020. Levinas, Adorno, and the Ethics of the Material Other. State University of New York Press.
38.
OksalaJohanna. 2023. “The Method of Critical Phenomenology: Simone de Beauvoir as a Phenomenologist.” European Journal of Philosophy31, no. 1: 137–150.
39.
PopaDeliaReynoldsIaan. 2021. “Critical Phenomenology and Phenomenological Critique.” Studia UBB. Philosophia66, no. 1: 7–20.
40.
RicœurPaul. 2004. A l’école de la phénomenologie. Vrin.
41.
RodemeyerLanei (2022) A Phenomenological Critique of Critical Phenomenology. In: AldeaAndreea SmarandaCarrDavidHeinämaaSara (eds). Phenomenology as Critique: Why Method Matters. Routledge, 95–112.
42.
RoseGillian. 1978. The Melancholy Science: An Introduction to the Thought of Theodor W. Adorno. MacMillan.
43.
SalamonGayle. 2018. “What’s Critical About Critical Phenomenology?” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology1: 8–17.
44.
ShaulDylan. 2020. “Levinas, Adorno, and the Light of Redemption: Notes on a Critical Eschatology.” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology4, no. 2: 43–62.
45.
TrepcaAmalia. 2020. “The Utopia of Eidetic Intuition: A Phenomenological Motif in Adorno.” Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy12, no. 1: 102–126.
46.
WeissGailAnnV. MurphyGayleSalamon (eds.). 2020. 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
47.
WolffErnst. 2006. “From Phenomenology to Critical Theory: The Genesis of Adorno’s Critical Theory from His Reading of Husserl.” Philosophy and Social Criticism32 (5): 555–572.
48.
ZahaviDanLoidoltSophie. 2022. “Critical Phenomenology and Psychiatry.” Continental Philosophy Review55: 55–75.
49.
ZanottiGiovanni. 2019. “Adorno on the Meaning of Phenomenology,” in Hegel and Phenomenology, edited by FerrarinAlfredoMoranDermotMagrìElisaMancaDanilo, 147–162. Springer.
