Michelman's Constitutional Essentials raises important questions about the idea of political liberalism and related idea of public reason. This essay offers a sympathetic commentary while also exploring the importance of the idea of reciprocity for both Rawls and Michelman.
AllenDanielle. 2023. Justice by Means of Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
2.
BaynesKenneth. 2016. Habermas. New York: Routledge.
3.
BaynesKenneth. 2019. “Public Reason’s Faith.” Biblioteca Della Liberta225: 1-14.
4.
BrennanJason (2021) Does Public Reason Liberalism rest on a Mistake? In: EdenbergEHannonM. (eds). Political Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
CohenG. A.2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
CohenJoshua. 1994. “Pluralism and Proceduralism.” Chicago-Kent Law Review69: 589-618.
7.
DoeflerR.MoynS.2021. “Democratizing the Supreme Court.” California Law Review109: 1-73.
8.
DworkinRonald (1978) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
9.
EdmundsonWilliam. 2020. “What is the argument for the fair value of political liberty?” Social Theory and Practice46. no. 3: 497-514.
10.
EnochDavid (2015) Against Public Reason. Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 2015. New York: Oxford, 112–142.
11.
FreemanSamuel. 1992. “Original Meaning, Democratic Interpretation and the Constitution.” Philosophy and Public Affairs21: 3-24.
12.
FreemanSamuel. 2007. Rawls. New York: Routledge.
13.
FreemanSamuel (2011) Is Libertarianism Liberal?Philosophy and Public Affairs30: 105–151.
14.
GausGeraldVan SchoelandtChad. 2015. “Public Reason.” In International Encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, edited by WrightJ., 2nd ed.Amsterdam: Elsevier
15.
HabermasJuergen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
HabermasJuergen. 1998. The Inclusion of the Other. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
KelsenHans. 1967. The Pure Theory of Law. Berkely: University of California Press.
18.
LarmoreCharles. 1999. “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy96: 599-625.
19.
LarmoreCharles. 2020. What Is Political Philosophy?Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
LelandR. J.2019. “Civic Friendship, Public Reason.” Philosophy and Public Affairs47. no. 1: 72–103.
21.
ListerAndrew (2017) Public Reason and Reciprocity. The Journal of Political Philosophy25: 155–172.
22.
ListerAndrew. 2017b. “Markets, desert, and reciprocity.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics16: 47-69.
23.
ListerAndrew. 2018. “The Coherence of Public Reason.” Journal of Moral Philosophy15. no. 1: 64-84.
24.
MichelmanFrank (1979) Welfare Rights in a Constitutional Democracy. Washington University Law Quarterly1979: 659–680.
25.
MichelmanFrank. 1997. “How can the people ever make laws? A critique of deliberative democracy,” in Deliberative Democracy, edited by BohmanJamesRehgW., 145-171. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
MichelmanFrank. 1998. “Constitutional Authorship,” in Constitutionalism, edited by AlexanderL., 64-98. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MichelmanFrank (1999) Brennan and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.
28.
QuongJonathan (2022) Public reason. Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyOnline Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
29.
RawlsJohn (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard.
30.
RawlsJohn. 2005. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
SchwartzmanMicah. 2004. “The completeness of public reason.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics3: 191-220.
32.
Van SchoelandtChad. 2015. “Justification, coercion and the place of public reason.” Philosophical Studies172: 1031-1050.
33.
Van WietmarschenHans. 2021. “Political Liberalism and Respect.” The Journal of Political Philosophy29. no. 3: 353-377.
34.
WaldronJeremy. 2002. “The Constitutional Concept of Democracy.” in Democracy, edited by EstlundD., 51-83. New York: Blackwell.
35.
WeithmanPaul. 2016. “Legitimacy and the project of Political Liberalism.” In Rawls, Political Liberalism and Reasonable Faith. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
ZurnChristopher. 2010. “The Logic of Legitimacy: Bootstrapping Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy.” Legal Theory16: 191-227.