In this essay, I reconsider the constitution of democratic freedom in aesthetic terms. My interest is in articulating a conception of aesthetic freedom that can be mapped onto a conception of democratic freedom. For this purpose, I bring together Charles Sanders Peirce’s ontology, which comprises fragments of an aesthetic theory, Friedrich Schiller’s concept of aesthetic play and Stanley Cavell’s democratic perfectionism. By providing a philosophical framework for constructing an aesthetics and politics that supports the recent aesthetic turn in political theory, which urges overcoming political theory’s excessive dependence on an epistemological theory of representation, and by proposing a modification to the turn’s heavy reliance on theories of affect, my reading of Peirce, Schiller and Cavell offers a new way to think about the political significance of the autonomy of aesthetic experience and affect for democratic freedom.
AndersonDouglas R.1995. Strands of System: The Philosophy of Charles Peirce. West Layfayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.
2.
AnkerElisabeth R.2014. Orgies of Feeling: Melodrama and the Politics of Freedom. Durham: Duke University Press.
3.
AnkersmitFrank. 1996. Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy Beyond Fact and Value. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
4.
BarnouwJeffrey. 1988. “‘Aesthetic’ for Schiller and Peirce: A Neglected Origin of Pragmatism.” Journal of the History of Ideas49 (4): 607-632.
5.
BarnouwJeffrey. 1994. “The Place of Peilrce’s ‘Esthetics’ in His Thought and in the Tradition of Aesthetics.” In Peirce and Value Theory: On Peircean Ethics and Aesthetics, edited by ParretHerman, 155-178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6.
BenjaminWalter. 2002. “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, Second Version.” In Walter Benjamin, Selected Writings, Vol 3, 1935-1938, edited by EilandHowardJenningsMichael, 101-133. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7.
BleikerRoland. 2009. Aesthetics and World Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BleikerRoland. 2018. Visual Global Politics. New York: Routledge.
9.
BogueRonald. 2003. Deleuze on Cinema. New York: Routledge.
10.
ButlerJudith. 2010. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?London; New York: Verso.
11.
ButlerJudith. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12.
CahillKevin. 2011. The Fate of Wonder: Wittgenstein’s Critique of Metaphysics and Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
CailloisRoger. 1961. Man, Play, and Games. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14.
CarsonCraig. 2017. The Aesthetics of Democracy: Eighteenth-Century Literature and Political Economy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
CavellStanley. 1978. “What Becomes of Things on Film?” Philosophy and Literature2 (2): 249-257.
16.
CavellStanley. 1979. The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Enlarged ed.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
17.
CavellStanley. 1981. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18.
CavellStanley. 1984. “The Thought of Movies.” In Themes out of School, edited by CavellStanley, 3-26. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
CavellStanley. 1988. “The Uncanniness of the Ordinary.” In In Quest for the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism, edited by CavellStanley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
CavellStanley. 1990. Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism: The Carus Lectures, 1988. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
CavellStanley. 2004. Cities of Words: Pedagogical Letters on a Register of Moral Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22.
ConnollyWilliam E.2002. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
23.
ConnollyWilliam E.2011. A World of Becoming. Durham: Duke University Press.
24.
DeleuzeGilles. 1997a. “Bartleby; or, The Formula.” In Essays Critical and Clinical, edited by DeleuzeGilles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
DeleuzeGilles. 1997b. “To Have Done With Judgment.” In Essays Critical and Clinical, edited by DeleuzeGilles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26.
DeleuzeGilles. 2001. Cinema 1: The Movement Image. London: Continuum.
27.
DeleuzeGilles. 2004. Difference and Repetition. London: Continuum.
28.
DeleuzeGillesGuattariFelix. 1987. Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
29.
DilworthDavid. 2014. “Intellectual Gravity and Elective Attractions: The Provenance of Peirce’s Categories in Schiller.” Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia15 (1): 37-72.
30.
DummThomas L.1999. A Politics of the Ordinary. New York: New York University Press.
31.
EzrahiYaron. 2015. Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
FergusonKennan. 2007. The Politics of Judgment: Aesthetics, Identity, and Political Theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
33.
FischMax. 1982. “Introduction.” In Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition, Vol. 1: xv-xxxv. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
34.
FrankJason. 2007. “Aesthetic Democracy: Walt Whitman and the Poetry of the People.” The Review of Politics69 (3): 402-430.
35.
FrankJason. 2010. Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Postrevolutionary America. 1st ed.Durham: Duke University Press.
36.
FrankJason. 2015. “The Living Image of the People.” Theory & Event18 (1).
37.
GreenJeffrey Edward. 2011. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
HabermasJürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. London: Polity.
39.
HonnethAxel. 2012. Reification: A New Look At An Old Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
HookwayChristopher. 1985. Peirce. New York: Routledge.
41.
HoopesJames. 1998. Community Denied: The Wrong Turn of Pragmatic Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
KantImmanuel. 1996. Critique of Pure Reason. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
43.
KiddIan James. 2017. “Reawakening to wonder: Wittgenstein, Feyerabend and scientism.” In Wittgenstein and Scientism, edited by BealeJonathanKiddIan James, 101-115. London: Routledge.
44.
KompridisNikolas. 2014. The Aesthetic Turn in Political Thought. New York: Continuum.
45.
KrausserPeter. 1977. ““The Three Fundamental Structural Categories of Charles S. Peirce” Transactions of the Charles S.” Peirce Society13 (3): 189-215.
46.
LaugierSandra. 2021. “Film as Moral Education.” Journal of Philosophy of Education55 (1): 263-281.
47.
LeggCatherine. 2017. “Idealism Operationalized: How Peirce’s Pragmatism Can Help Explicate and Motivate the Possibly Surprising Idea of Reality as Representational.” In Peirce on Perception and Reasoning, edited by HullKathleen A.AtkinsRichard Kenneth, 52-65. London: Routledge.
48.
LeysRuth. 2011. “The Turn to Affect: A Critique.” Critical Inquiry37 (3): 434-472.
49.
LeysRuth. 2017. The Ascent of Affect: Genealogy and Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
SmithChristiana. 1973. “The Aesthetics of Charles S. Peirce.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism31 (November): 21.
51.
MassumiBrian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
52.
MassumiBrian. 2015. Politics of Affect. Cambridge: Polity.
53.
MulhallStephen. 2015. On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. London; NY: Routledge.
54.
NorrisAndrew. 2017. Becoming Who We Are: Politics and Practical Philosophy in the Work of Stanley Cavell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
NorvalAletta J.2007. Aversive Democracy: Inheritance and Originality in the Democratic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
PanagiaDavide. 2006. The Poetics of Political Thinking. Durham: Duke University Press.
57.
PanagiaDavide. 2010. The Political Life of Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
58.
PanagiaDavide. 2016. Ten Theses for an Aesthetics of Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
59.
PanagiaDavide. 2018. Rancière’s Sentiments. Durham: Duke University Press.
60.
PanagiaDavide. 2020. “Attending to Film: The World Viewed and Cinematic Political Thinking.” Discourse42 (12): 81-111.
61.
PeirceCharles Sanders. 1931. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by HartshorneC.WeissP., Vol. 1-6. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
PeirceCharles Sanders. 1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by BurksArthur W., Vol. 7-8. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
PeirceCharles Sanders. 1998. The Essential Peirce, Volume 2, edited by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
64.
PetryEdward S.1992. “The Origin and Development of Peirce’s Concept of Self-Control.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society28 (4): 667-690.
65.
RäberMichael. 2013. “The Art of Democracy – Art as a Tool for Developing Democratic Citizenship and Stimulating Public Debate: A Rortyan-Deweyan Account.” Humanities2 (2): 176-192.
66.
RäberMichael. 2020. Knowing Democracy – A Pragmatist Account of the Epistemic Dimension in Democratic Politics. Cham: Springer.
67.
RancièreJacques. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
68.
RancièreJacques. 2011. The Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso.
69.
RancièreJacques. 2013a. The Politics of Aesthetics. Reprint. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
70.
RancièreJacques. 2013b. Aisthesis: Scenes from the Aesthetic Regime of Art. Translated by Zakir Paul. London; NY: Verso.
71.
SchillerJohann Christoph Friedrich. 2005. On the Aesthetic Education of Man: Parallel-Text Edition, edited by WilkinsonE. M.WilloughbyL. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72.
SchoolmanMorton. 2004. Reason and Horror: Critical Theory, Democracy and Aesthetic Individuality. New York: Routledge.
73.
SchoolmanMorton. 2020. A Democratic Enlightenment: The Reconciliation Image, Aesthetic Education, Possible Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
74.
SebeokThomas A.1982. The Play of Musement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
75.
ShortThomas L.2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
SimonsJon. 2008. “Aestheticisation of Politics: From Fascism to Radical Democracy.” Journal for Cultural Research12 (3): 207-229.
77.
SinghSurti. 2020. “Dark Play: Aesthetic Resistance in Lukács, Benjamin and Adorno.” Philosophy & Social Criticism46 (10): 1182-1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719866244.
78.
Sutton-SmithBrian. 1997. The Ambiguity of Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
TullyJames. 2008. Public Philosophy in a New Key: Volume 1, Democracy and Civic Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
UrbinatiNadia. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81.
UrbinatiNadia. 2019. Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
82.
WilsonAaron Bruce, 2016. Peirce’s Empiricism: Its Roots and Its Originality, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
83.
WittgensteinLudwig. 1993. “Lecture on Ethics.” In Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951, edited by KlaggeJamesNordmannAlfred, 37-44. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.
84.
WittgensteinLudwig. 1969. On Certainty. Translated by Denis Paul and G.E.M. Anscombe, edited by AnscombeG. E. M.von WrightG. H.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
85.
WittgensteinLudwig. 2009a. Philosophical Investigations. The German text, with an English Translation. 1953. Rev. 4th ed.translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte, edited by HackerP. M. S.SchulteJoachim. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
86.
WittgensteinLudwig. 2009b. “Philosophy of Psychology—A Fragment.” [Previously known as “Part II.”] In Philosophical Investigations. The German text, with an English Translation. 1953. Rev. 4th ed.translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte, edited by HackerP. M. S.SchulteJoachim, 182–243. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
87.
ZerilliLinda M. G.2016. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
