It is generally recognized that Adorno and Levinas should both be read as urging a rethinking of ethics in light of Auschwitz. This demand should be understood in terms of the acknowledgement of transcendence. A phenomenological account of the event of Auschwitz developed by Todes motivates my use of Cavell’s distinction between acknowledgement and knowledge. Both Levinas and Adorno argue that an ethically adequate acknowledgement of transcendence requires that the traditional concept of transcendence as represented in theodicy must be rejected. This rejection takes the form of a rejection of theodicy (Levinas) and a negative theodicy (Adorno). I argue that Adorno’s response is superior because it is a response to the specificity and particularity of the event of Auschwitz as the destruction of, rather than merely the denial of, the humanity of both perpetrators and victims.
Adorno, Theodor ( 1983) Negative Dialectics, trans. E. B. Ashton. New York: Continuum.
2.
Adorno, Theodor ( 1984) Minima Moralia, trans. E. Jephcott. London: Verso.
3.
Adorno, Theodor ( 2006) History and Freedom, trans. R. Livingstone . New York: Blackwell.
4.
Adorno, Theodor and Horkheimer, Max ( 2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. E. Jephcott. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Alford, C. Fred ( 2003) Levinas, the Frankfurt School, and Psychoanalysis. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
6.
Bauer, Yehuda ( 2000) Rethinking the Holocaust. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Bernstein, Jay ( 2001) Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Bernstein, Jay ( 2006) ‘Intact and Fragmented Bodies: Versions of Ethics ‘‘after Auschwitz’’’, New German Critique97: 31-52.
9.
Bernstein, Richard ( 2002) ‘Evil and the Temptation of Theodicy’, in The Cambridge Companion to Levinas, ed. Simon Critchley and Robert Bernasconi.New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 252-67.
10.
Cavell, Stanley ( 1988) Themes Out of School: Effects and Causes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Cavell, Stanley ( 2002) Must We Mean What We Say?New York : Cambridge University Press.
De Vries, Hent ( 2005) Minimal Theologies: Critiques of Secular Reason in Adorno and Levinas. Baltimore,MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Hammer, Espen ( 2000) ‘Adorno and Extreme Evil’, Philosophy & Social Criticism26(4): 75-93.
15.
Hammer, Espen ( 2005) Adorno and the Political. New York : Routledge.
16.
Horowitz, Asher ( 2002) ‘‘‘By a Hair’s Breadth’’: Critique, Transcendence, and the Ethical in Adorno and Levinas’, Philosophy & Social Criticism28(2): 213-48.
17.
Kant, Immanuel ( 1999) Critique of Pure Reason, trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Kaufmann, David ( 2000) ‘Correlations, Constellations and the Truth: Adorno’s Ontology of Redemption’, Philosophy & Social Criticism26(5): 62-80.
19.
Kaufmann, David ( 2001) ‘Beyond Use, within Reason: Adorno, Benjamin, and the Question of Theology’, New German Critique83: 151-73.
20.
Levi, Primo ( 1986) Survival in Auschwitz, trans. S. Woolf. New York: Simon & Schuster.
21.
Levinas, Emmanuel ( 1969) Totality and Infinity, trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
22.
Levinas, Emmanuel ( 1997) Otherwise than Being, trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
23.
Levinas, Emmanuel ( 1998a) ‘Useless Suffering’, in Entre-Nous , trans. M. Smith and B. Harshav. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
Levinas, Emmanuel ( 1998b) ‘Philosophy, Justice, and Love’, in Entre-Nous, trans. M. Smith and B. Harshav. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
Levinas, Emmanuel ( 1998c) ‘Transcendence and Evil’, in Collected Philosophical Papers, trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
26.
Levinas, Emmanuel ( 2000) ‘The Name of a Dog, or Natural Rights’, in Difficult Freedom, trans. S. Hand. New York: Athlone Press.
27.
McDowell, John ( 1994) Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
McDowell, John ( 2000) ‘Towards Rehabilitating Objectivity’, in Rorty and His Critics, ed. Robert Brandom. New York: Blackwell.
29.
Neiman, Susan ( 2004) Evil in Modern Thought, 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Nemo, Philippe ( 1998) Job and the Excess of Evil. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
31.
O’Connor, Brian ( 2004) Adorno’s Negative Dialectic: Philosophy and the Possibility of Critical Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Putnam, Hilary ( 2002) ‘Levinas and Judaism’, in The Cambridge Companion to Levinas, ed. Simon Critchley and Robert Bernasconi.New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-62.
33.
Rachels, James ( 1986) The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
Rorty, Richard ( 1998) ‘The Very Idea of Answerability to the World’ , in Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, vol. 3. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Smith, Nick ( 2007) ‘Adorno vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention’ , Continental Philosophy Review40(3): 275-306.
36.
Todes, Samuel ( 2001) Body and World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Villa, Dana ( 2007) ‘Genealogies of Total Domination: Arendt, Adorno, and Auschwitz’, New German Critique34(1): 1-45.
38.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig ( 2001) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Blackwell.
