In recent work, Cheryl Misak has developed a novel justification of deliberative democracy rooted in Peircean epistemology. In this article, the author expands Misak's arguments to show that not only does Peircean pragmatism provide a justification for deliberative democracy that is more compelling than the justifications offered by competing liberal and discursivist views, but also fixes a specific conception of deliberative politics that is perfectionist rather than neutralist. The article concludes with a discussion of whether the `epistemic perfectionism' implied by the pragmatist argument could be endorsed by liberal democrats.
Ackerman, Bruce (1989) ` Why Dialogue? ', Journal of Philosophy86: 16—27 .
2.
Anderson, Douglas (1995) Strands of System. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press .
3.
Bobbio, Norberto (1984) The Future of Democracy. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press .
4.
Bohman, James (1998) ` The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy ', The Journal of Political Philosophy6(4): 400—25 .
5.
Buchanan, Allen (2004) ` Political Liberalism and Social Epistemology' , Philosophy & Public Affairs32(2): 95—130 .
6.
Christiano, Thomas (2001) ` Is There Any Basis for Rawls' Duty of Civility ?', The Modern Schoolman78: 151—61 .
7.
Cohen, Joshua (1997) `Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy', in Deliberative Democracy, ed. James Bohman and William RehgCambridge, MA: MIT Press .
8.
Dryzek, John (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, and Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press .
9.
Dworkin, Ronald (1985) A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
10.
Estlund, David (1993) `Making Truth Safe for Democracy', in The Idea of Democracy, ed. David Copp , Jean Hampton , John Roemer.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
11.
Estlund, David (1997) `Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority', in Deliberative Democracy , ed. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
12.
Estlund, David (1998) ` The Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberals Must Admit the Truth ', Ethics108: 252—75 .
13.
Fish, Stanley (1999) `Mutual Respect as a Device of Exclusion', in Deliberative Politics , ed. Stephen Macado. New York: Oxford University Press .
14.
Freeman, Samuel (2000) ` Deliberative Democracy: a Sympathetic Comment ', Philosophy & Public Affairs29(4): 371—418 .
15.
George, Robert and Wolfe, Christopher (2000) `Introduction', in their Natural Law and Public Reason. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press .
16.
Gutmann, Amy (1985) ` Communitarian Critics of Liberalism ', Philosophy & Public Affairs14(3): 308—22 .
17.
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis (1996) Democracy and Disagreement . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
18.
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis (2000) `Why Deliberative Democracy is Different', in Democracy, ed. Ellen Paul , Fred Miller and Jeffrey Paul.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
19.
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis (2003) `Deliberative Democracy Beyond Process', in Debating Deliberative Democracy, ed. James Fishkin and Peter Laslett.Oxford: Blackwell .
20.
Haack, Susan (1998) Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
21.
Haack, Susan (2003) Defending Science — Within Reason. New York: Prometheus Books .
22.
Habermas, Jürgen (1990) `Discourse Ethics', in his Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
23.
Habermas, Jürgen (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
24.
Hardin, Russell (2002) `The Crippled Epistemology of Extremism', in Albert Breton (ed.) Political Extremism and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
25.
Hookway, Christopher (1985) Peirce. New York: Routledge .
26.
Hookway, Christopher (2000) Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism. New York: Oxford University Press .
27.
Larmore, Charles (1987) Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
28.
Larmore, Charles (2003) `Public Reason', in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Samuel Freeman.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
29.
List, Christian and Goodin, Robert (2001) ` Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem ', The Journal of Political Philosophy9(3): 277—306 .
Sunstein, Cass (2001b) Designing Democracy. New York : Oxford University Press .
63.
Sunstein, Cass (2003a) `The Law of Group Polarization', in Debating Deliberative Democracy, ed. James Fishkin and Peter LaslettOxford: Blackwell .
64.
Sunstein, Cass (2003b) Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
65.
Swain, Carol and Nieli, Russ eds (2003) Contemporary Voices of White Nationalism . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
66.
Talisse, Robert B. (2001) ` On a Supposed Tension in Peirce's “Fixation of Belief” ', Journal of Philosophical ResearchXXVI: 561—9 .
67.
Talisse, Robert B. (2004) ` Towards a Peircean Politics of Inquiry ', Transactions of the C. S. Peirce SocietyXL: 21—38 .
68.
Talisse, Robert B. (2005a) Democracy After Liberalism. New York: Routledge .
69.
Talisse, Robert B. (2005b) ` Deliberativist Responses to Activist Challenges ', Philosophy and Social Criticism31: 423—44 .
70.
Talisse, Robert B. (2005c) `Dilemmas of Public Reason', in The Legacy of John Rawls', ed. Thom Brooks and Fabian Freyenhaged.Oxford: Continuum .
71.
Talisse, Robert B. (2005d) ` Deliberative Democracy Defended ', Res Publica11: 1—15 .
72.
Unger, Peter (1996) Living High and Letting Die. New York: Oxford University Press .
73.
Waldron , Jeremy (1993) Liberal Rights. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
74.
Wall, Steven (1998) Liberalism, Perfectionism, and Restraint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
75.
Wiggins, David (1998) ` C. S. Peirce: Belief, Truth, and Going From the Known to the Unknown', Pragmatism , ed. Cheryl Misak, Canadian Journal of Philosophy24 (supp. vol.): 9—29 .
76.
Williams, Bernard (1973) `A Critique of Utilitarianism', in Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
77.
Wolf, Susan (1982) ` Moral Saints ', Journal of Philosophy79(8): 419—39 .
78.
Young, Iris Marion (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press .
79.
Young, Iris Marion (2003) `Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy ', in Debating Deliberative Democracy, ed. James Fishkin and Peter Laslett.Oxford: Blackwell .
