In this essay, I attempt to measure various prevailing democratic theories against an argument that Carl Schmitt advances in the first chapter of his ‘Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy’. In practice, he claims there, democratic politics is compelled to introduce a distinction between ‘the will of the people’ and the behaviour of the empirical people, thus justifying the bracketing and unlimited suspension of the latter in the name of the former, even to the point of dictatorship. I argue that no contemporary approach to democracy as a fundamental value is able to mount a compelling response to this critique and that we should therefore reconsider the status of democracy as a normative commitment. I proceed by carefully and closely reading Schmitt’s chapter and then by juxtaposing various currents of democratic theory (including liberal, deliberative, epistemic and various hybrids thereof) with the trajectory of Schmitt’s argument. This essay is therefore less of a contribution to Schmitt scholarship, in the sense that it does not take a panoramic view of his corpus to determine his final stance on democracy, and more of an intervention into contemporary democratic theory using Schmitt’s argument as a kind of lever.
AbtsKoenRummensStefan. 2007. “Populism versus Democracy.” Political Studies55, no 2: 405–24.
2.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3.
ArnesonRichard J.2004. “Democracy Is Not Intrinsically Just.” In Justice and Democracy, edited by DowdingKeithGoodinRobert E.PatemanCarole, 40–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BalakrishnanGopal. 2000. The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso.
5.
BarberBenjamin. 1996. “Foundationalism and Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by BenhabibSeyla, 348–59. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
BellamyRichardBaehrPeter. 1993. “Carl Schmitt and the Contradictions of Liberal Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research23, no. 2: 163–85.
8.
BenhabibSeyla. 1994. “Deliberative Rationality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy.” Constellations1, no. 1: 26–52.
9.
BobbioNoberto. 1990. Liberalism and Democracy. Translated by RyleMartinSoperKate. New York: Verso.
10.
BrennanJason. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
BuskLarry Alan. 2018. “Radical Democracy with what Demos? Mouffe and Laclau after the Right of the Right.” Radical Philosophy Review21, no. 2: 225–48.
12.
BuskLarry Alan. 2020. Democracy in Spite of the Demos: From Arendt to the Frankfurt School. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
13.
CaplanBryan. 2008. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14.
ChambersSimone. 2017. “Balancing Epistemic Quality and Equal Participation in a System Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” Social Epistemology31, no. 3: 266–76.
15.
CherneskiJanaLee. 2017. “An Unacknowledged Adversary: Carl Schmitt, Joseph Schumpeter, and the Classical Doctrine of Democracy.” Critical Review29, no. 4: 447–72. 10.1080/08913811.2017.1463624.
16.
ChristianoThomas. 1996. The Rule of the Many. Boulder: Westview Press.
17.
CohenJoshua. 1993. “Moral Pluralism and Political Consensus.” In The Idea of Democracy, edited by CoppDavidHamptonJeanRoemerJohn, 270–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
ConnollyWilliam E.2017. Aspirational Fascism: The Struggle for Multifaceted Democracy under Trumpism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
CristiRenato. 1998. Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism: Strong State, Free Economy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
20.
CritchlowDonald T.2005. Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: A Woman’s Crusade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
CritchlowDonald T.2009. The Conservative Ascendancy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22.
DahlRobert Alan. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
23.
ErmanEvaMöllerNiklas. 2016. “Why Democracy Cannot Be Grounded in Epistemic Principles.” Social Theory and Practice42, no. 3: 449–73.
24.
EstlundDavid M.2008. Democratic Authority. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
EstlundDavid M.2009. “Epistemic Proceduralism and Democratic Authority.” In Does Truth Matter? Democracy and Public Space, edited by TinneveltRonaldGeenensRaf, 15–28. New York: Springer.
26.
FishkinJames S.2011. When the People Speak. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
GutmannAmy. 1980. Liberal Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HabermasJürgen. 1989. “The Horrors of Autonomy: Carl Schmitt in English.” In The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate. Translated by NicholsenShierry Weber, 128–39. Cambridge: MIT Press.
29.
HabermasJürgen. 1995. “Reconciliation through the Public use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy92, no. 3: 109–131.
30.
HabermasJürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Translated by RehgWilliam. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31.
HibbingJohn R.Theiss-MorseElizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HoevelerJ. DavidJr. 1991. Watch on the Right. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
33.
HonigBonnie. 1996. “Difference, Dilemmas, and the Politics of Home.” In Democracy and Difference, edited by BenhabibSeyla, 257–77. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
HonigBonnie. 2007. “Between Decision and Deliberation: Political Paradox in Democratic Theory.” The American Political Science Review; Washington101, no. 1: 1–17.
KalyvasAndreas. 2009. Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
KeenanAlan. 2003. Democracy in Question: Democratic Openness in a Time of Political Closure. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
38.
LandemoreHélène. 2013. Democratic Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39.
LandemoreHélène. 2014. “Yes, We Can Make It Up on Volume: Answers to Critics.” Critical Review26, no. 1–2: 184–237.
40.
LandemoreHélène. 2017. “Beyond the Fact of Disagreement? The Epistemic Turn in Deliberative Democracy.” Social Epistemology31, no. 3: 277–95.
41.
LefortClaude. 1989. Democracy and Political Theory. Translated by MaceyDavid. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
LupiaArthur. 2015. Uninformed: Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
McCormickJohn P.1999. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MinJohn B.2016. “Politics Must Get It Right Sometimes: Reply to Muirhead.” Critical Review28, no. 3–4: 404–11.
45.
MouffeChantal. 2006. The Return of the Political. New York: Verso.
46.
MounkYascha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
47.
MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóbal Rovira. 2013. “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition48, no. 2: 147–74.
48.
MüllerJan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
49.
NashGeorge H.2006. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945. 30th anniversary ed. Wilmington: Intercollegiate Studies Institute.
50.
NeiwertDavid. 2017. Alt-America: The Rise of the Radical Right in the Age of Trump. London: Verso.
51.
Ochoa EspejoPaulina. 2015. “Power to Whom? The People between Procedure and Populism.” In The Promise and Perils of Populism, edited by de la TorreCarlos, 59–90. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
52.
OffeClausPreussUlrich K.. 1991. “Democratic Institutions and Moral Resources.” In Political Theory Today, edited by HeldDavid, 143–71. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
53.
OlsonKevin. 2007. “Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science51, no. 2: 330–43.
54.
O’SullivanJohn. 2016. “Foreward.” In The Demon in Democracy, edited by LegutkoRyszard, 5–7. New York: Encounter Books.
55.
PanizzaFrancisco, ed. 2005. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso.
PopperKarl. 1950. The Open Society and Its Enemies. rev. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
58.
RawlsJohn. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
59.
SchmittCarl. 1987. “Interrogation of Carl Schmitt by Robert Kempner.” Telos, translated by BenderskyJoseph W., no. 72: 97–107.
60.
SchmittCarl. 1988. Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Translated by KennedyEllen. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus, Siebente Auflage. Berlin: Duncker & Humbolt, 1991]
61.
SchmittCarl. 2004. On the Three Types of Juristic Thought. Translated by BenderskyJoseph W.. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
62.
SchmittCarl. 2006a. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by SchwabGeorge. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
63.
SchmittCarl. 2006b. The Nomos of the Earth. Translated by UlmenG. L.. Candor, New York: Telos Press.
64.
SchmittCarl. 2007a. The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition. Translated by SchwabGeorge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
65.
SchmittCarl. 2007b. Theory of the Partisan. Translated by UlmenG. L.. Candor, New York: Telos Press.
66.
SchmittCarl. 2015. Land and Sea: A World-Historical Meditation. Edited by BermanRussell A.ZeitlinSamuel Garret. Translated by ZeitlinSamuel Garret. Candor, New York: Telos Press.
67.
SchumpeterJoseph A.1950. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 3rd ed. New York: Harper.
68.
SchupmannBenjamin A.2017. Carl Schmitt’s State and Constitutional Theory: A Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69.
ShapiroIan. 1996. Democracy’s Place. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
70.
ShapiroIan. 1999. Democratic Justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
71.
SominIlya. 2016. Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter. 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
72.
TerchekRonald J.ConteThomas C., eds. 2000. Theories of Democracy: A Reader. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
73.
UrbinatiNadia. 2014. Democracy Disfigured. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
74.
Vázquez-ArroyoAntonio Y.2016. Political Responsibility: Responding to Predicaments of Power. New York: Columbia University Press.
75.
WalzerMichael. 1981. “Philosophy and Democracy.” Political Theory9, no. 3: 379–99.
76.
WollheimRichard. 1972. “A Paradox in the Theory of Democracy.” In Philosophy, Politics, and Society, Second Series, edited by LaslettPeterRuncimanW. G., 71–87. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
77.
WoodEllen Meiksins. 2016. Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism. New York: Verso.
78.
YackBernard. 2012. “Democracy and the Love of Truth.” In Truth and Democracy, edited by ElkinsJeremyNorrisAndrew, 166–80. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
