When a group shares a viewpoint on a status order, their consensus imparts legitimacy to their shared understanding of that order. Conversely, a group espousing multiple viewpoints undermines the notion that one “true” hierarchy exists. To build empirical knowledge about how social groups contribute to the construction of status orders, we take the occupational hierarchy as a case study and map the structure of agreement across intersectional groups. First, we quantify the extent to which groups (1) agree internally on their occupational rankings (within-group consensus) and (2) agree with other groups (intergroup consensus). Using General Social Survey data on occupational perceptions, we find a cluster of privileged groups—namely, highly educated White men and women—who agree internally and with each other on the occupational status order. Lesser advantaged groups exhibit less internal agreement and do not cohere around an alternative conceptualization of value, leaving unchallenged the consensus of privileged groups.
AccominottiFabienLynnFreda B.SauderMichael. 2022. “The Architecture of Status Hierarchies: Variations in Structure and Why They Matter for Inequality.”RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences8(6):87–102. doi:10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.05.
2.
BillsDavid B.2003. “Credentials, Signals, and Screens: Explaining the Relationship between Schooling and Job Assignment.”Review of Educational Research73(4):441–69. doi:10.3102/00346543073004441.
3.
BoltanskiLucThévenotLaurent. 1983. “Finding One’s Way in Social Space: A Study Based on Games.”Social Science Information22(4–5):631–80. doi:10.1177/053901883022004003.
4.
BoltanskiLucThévenotLaurent. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
BoutylineAndreiVaiseyStephen. 2017. “Belief Network Analysis: A Relational Approach to Understanding the Structure of Attitudes.”American Journal of Sociology122(5):1371–447.
6.
CechErin A.2022. “The Intersectional Privilege of White Able-Bodied Heterosexual Men in STEM.”Science Advances8(24):eabo1558. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo1558.
CorrellShelley J.RidgewayCecilia L.ZuckermanEzra W.JankSharonJordan-BlochSaraNakagawaSandra. 2017. “It’s the Conventional Thought That Counts: How Third-Order Inference Produces Status Advantage.”American Sociological Review82(2):297–327. doi:10.1177/0003122417691503.
9.
CsárdiGáborNepuszTamásTraagVincentHorvátSzabolcsZaniniFabioNoomDanielMüllerKirill. 2023. “igraph: Network Analysis and Visualization in R.” R Package Version 1.5.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=igraph. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7682609.
10.
FreelandRobert E.HoeyJesse. 2018. “The Structure of Deference: Modeling Occupational Status Using Affect Control Theory.”American Sociological Review83(2):243–77. doi:10.1177/0003122418761857.
11.
HardingDavid J.2011. “Rethinking the Cultural Context of Schooling Decisions in Disadvantaged Neighborhoods: From Deviant Subculture to Cultural Heterogeneity.”Sociology of Education84(4):322–39. doi:10.1177/0038040711417008.
12.
HardingSandra. 1991. Whose Science, Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
JacomyMathieuVenturiniTommasoHeymannSebastienBastianMathieu. 2014. “ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software.”PLoS One9(6):e98679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098679.
14.
JenkinsTania M.2023. “Making the Cut: Status, Credentials, and Hiring in Medicine.”Social Problems70(2):435–55. doi:10.1093/socpro/spab046.
15.
JiangWenhao. 2023. “The Cultural Devaluation of Feminized Work: The Evolution of Occupational Prestige and Gender Typing in the United States, 1900-2019.” SocArXiv. doi:10.31235/osf.io/8q3ca.
16.
JohnsonCathrynDowdTimothy J.RidgewayCecilia L.2006. “Legitimacy as a Social Process.”Annual Review of Sociology32(1):53–78. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123101.
17.
KmettyZoltánKoltaiJúliaRudasTamás. 2021. “The Presence of Occupational Structure in Online Texts Based on Word Embedding NLP Models.”EPJ Data Science10(1):1–20. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00311-9.
18.
LamontMichèle. 2000. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
LynnFreda B.EllerbachGeorge. 2017. “A Position with a View: Educational Status and the Construction of the Occupational Hierarchy.”American Sociological Review82(1):32–58. doi:10.1177/0003122416671743.
20.
MacKinnonNeil J.LangfordTom. 1994. “The Meaning of Occupational Prestige Scores: A Social Psychological Analysis and Interpretation.”The Sociological Quarterly35(2):215–45.
21.
MaloneyEmily. 2020. “The Social Psychology of Occupational Status Groups: Relationality in the Structure of Deference.”Social Psychology Quarterly83(4):463–75. doi:10.1177/0190272520902455.
22.
MartinJohn Levi. 2000. “What Do Animals Do All Day?: The Division of Labor, Class Bodies, and Totemic Thinking in the Popular Imagination.”Poetics27(2):195–231. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00025-X.
23.
MartinJohn Levi. 2002. “Power, Authority, and the Constraint of Belief Systems.”American Journal of Sociology107(4):861–904. doi:10.1086/343192.
24.
MonkEllis P.2022. “Inequality without Groups: Contemporary Theories of Categories, Intersectional Typicality, and the Disaggregation of Difference.”Sociological Theory40(1):3–27. doi:10.1177/07352751221076863.
25.
NakaoKeikoTreasJudith. 1994. “Updating Occupational Prestige and Socioeconomic Scores: How the New Measures Measure up.”Sociological Methodology24:1–72. doi:10.2307/270978.
26.
NoonanMary C.LynnFreda B.WalkerMark H.2020. “Boxed in: Beliefs about the Compatibility and Likability of Mother-Occupation and Father-Occupation Role Combinations.”Socius6. doi:10.1177/2378023120942449.
27.
RidgewayCecilia L.2014. “Why Status Matters for Inequality.”American Sociological Review79(1):1–16. doi:10.1177/0003122413515997.
28.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelly J.2006. “Consensus and the Creation of Status Beliefs.”Social Forces85(1):431–53. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0139.
29.
RiveraLauren A.2011. “Ivies, Extracurriculars, and Exclusion: Elite Employers’ Use of Educational Credentials.”Research in Social Stratification and Mobility29(1):71–90. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2010.12.001.
30.
SmithTom W.and Jaesok Son. 2014. “Measuring Occupational Prestige on the 2012General Social Survey.” Methodological Report No. 122. NORC, Chicago, IL.
31.
SweetPaige L.2020. “Who Knows? Reflexivity in Feminist Standpoint Theory and Bourdieu.”Gender & Society34(6):922–50. doi:10.1177/0891243220966600.
32.
TreimanDonald J.1977. Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Academic Press.
33.
ValentinoLauren. 2021. “The Heterarchy of Occupational Status: Evidence for Diverse Logics of Prestige in the United States.”Sociological Forum36(S1):1395–418. doi:10.1111/socf.12762.
34.
ValentinoLauren. 2022. “Status Lenses: Mapping Hierarchy and Consensus in Status Beliefs.”RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences8(7):89–110. doi:10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.05.
35.
WeedenKim A.2002. “Why Do Some Occupations Pay More than Others? Social Closure and Earnings Inequality in the United States.”American Journal of Sociology108(1):55–101. doi:10.1086/344121.
36.
WoodMichael Lee. 2023. “Measuring Cultural Diversity in Text with Word Counts.”Social Psychology Quarterly. doi:10.1177/01902725231194356.
37.
ZhouXueguang. 2005. “The Institutional Logic of Occupational Prestige Ranking: Reconceptualization and Reanalyses.”American Journal of Sociology111(1):90–140. doi:10.1086/428687.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
