Major environmental jolts can prompt individuals to critically evaluate their personal view of the legitimacy (i.e., propriety) of established authorities, especially when jolts amplify conflicts between the authority and individuals’ value priorities. The COVID-19 pandemic constituted a major jolt that highlighted both clashes and alignment between the values of public health officials (enhancement of health and disease prevention) and other basic values. Using data from a survey of 1,356 U.S. adults collected in spring 2022, I descriptively assess whether the pandemic jolt prompted individuals to critically evaluate the legitimacy of public health officials. I then investigate how basic values that aligned and clashed with public health values during the pandemic shaped assessments of public health officials’ propriety two years into the pandemic as well as intentions to comply with them in a future health crisis. Descriptive findings reveal that individuals actively assessed public health legitimacy during the pandemic. Other analyses demonstrate how value (mis)alignment affects evaluations of the propriety of public health officials. Values also operate through propriety assessments to influence future compliance intentions, providing insight into social psychological processes undergirding institutional endurance and change.
AcockAlan C.2013. Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata (rev. ed.). College Station, TX: StataCorp.
2.
AlfordRobert R.FriedlandRoger. 1985. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AllisonPaul D.2012. “Handling Missing Data by Maximum Likelihood.” Paper presented at the SAS Global Forum, Haverford, PA, 22–25 April 2012.
4.
AjzenIcek. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50:179–211.
5.
BardiAnatSchwartzShalom. 2003. “Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin29:1207–20.
6.
BayerRonaldFairchildAmy L.2004. “The Genesis of Public Health Ethics.”Bioethics18(6):473–92.
7.
BentlerPeter M.1990. “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models.”Psychological Bulletin107(2):238–46.
8.
BesharovMarya L.SmithWendy K.2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications.”Academy of Management Review39(3):364–81.
9.
BitektineAlexHaackPatrick. 2015. “The ‘Macro’ and the ‘Micro’ of Legitimacy: Toward a Multilevel Theory of the Legitimacy Process.”Academy of Management Review40:49–75.
10.
BrownsonRoss C.BurkeThomas A.ColditzGraham A.SametJonathan M.2020. “Reimagining Public Health in the Aftermath of a Pandemic.”American Journal of Public Health110(11):1605–10.
ChungChi-NienLuoXiaowei. 2008. “Human Agents, Contexts, and Institutional Change: The Decline of Family in the Leadership of Business Groups.”Organization Science19(1):124–42.
13.
ClemensElisabeth S.CookJames M.1999. “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change.”Annual Review of Sociology25(1):441–66.
14.
DornbushSanford M.ScottRichard W.1975. Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
DowlingJohnPfefferJeffrey. 1975. “Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior.”Pacific Sociological Review18(1):122–36.
16.
FeatherNorman T.1995. “Values, Valences, and Choice: The Influence of Values on the Perceived Attractiveness and Choice of Alternatives.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68(6):1135–51.
17.
FinchDavidDeephouseDavidVarellaPaul. 2015. “Examining an Individual’s Legitimacy Judgment Using the Value–Attitude System: The Role of Environmental and Economic Values and Source Credibility.”Journal of Business Ethics127(2):265–81.
18.
FishbeinMartinAjzenIcek. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
FriedlandRogerAlfordRobert R.1991. “Bridging Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” Pp. 232–63 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
GagnonMarie-PierreGodinGaston. 2000. “The Impact of New Antiretroviral Treatments on College Students’ Intention to Use a Condom with a New Sexual Partner.”AIDS Education and Prevention: Official Publication of the International Society for AIDS Education12:239–51.
21.
GatsevaPenka D.ArgirovaMariana. 2011. “Public Health: The Science of Promoting Health.”Journal of Public Health19(3):205–206.
22.
GodinGastonKokGerjo. 1996. “The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of Its Applications to Health-Related Behaviors.”American Journal of Health Promotion11(2):87–98.
23.
GrahamJesseHaidtJonathanNosekBrian A.2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(5):1029–46.
24.
HaackPatrickSchilkeOliverZuckerLynne. 2020. “Legitimacy Revisited: Disentangling Propriety, Validity, and Consensus.”Journal of Management Studies58(3):749–81.
25.
HammJoseph A.TrinknerRickCarrJames D.2017. “Fair Process, Trust, and Cooperation: Moving toward an Integrated Framework of Police Legitimacy.”Criminal Justice and Behavior44(9):1183–212.
26.
HäyryM.2006. “Public Health and Human Values.”Journal of Medical Ethics32(9):519–21.
27.
HitlinSteven. 2008. Moral Selves, Evil Selves: The Social Psychology of Conscience. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
28.
HuyQuy NguyenCorleyKevin G.KraatzMatthew S.2014. “From Support to Mutiny: Shifting Legitimacy Judgments and Emotional Reactions Impacting the Implementation of Radical Change.”Academy of Management Journal57(6):1650–80.
29.
JohnsonCathrynDowdTimothy J.RidgewayCecilia L.2006. “Legitimacy as a Social Process.”Annual Review of Sociology32(1):53–78.
30.
MacKinnonDavid P.KrullJennifer L.LockwoodChondra M.2000. “Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding, and Suppression Effect.”Prevention Science1(4):173–81.
31.
MaraniMarcoKatulGabriel G.PanWilliam K.ParolariAnthony J.2021. “Intensity and Frequency of Extreme Novel Epidemics.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(35):1–4.
32.
MilesAndrewVaiseyStephen. 2015. “Morality and Politics: Comparing Alternate Theories.”Social Science Research53:252–69.
33.
PetriniCarlo. 2010. “Theoretical Models and Operational Frameworks in Public Health Ethics.”International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health7(1):189–202.
34.
RobinsonPaul H.DarleyJohn M.1997. “The Utility of Desert.”Northwestern University Law Review91(2):453–99.
35.
RokeachMilton. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
36.
SchwartzShalom H.1994. “Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Content of Human Values?”Journal of Social Issues50:19–45.
37.
SchwartzShalom H.2012. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.”Online Readings in Psychology and Culture2(1):1–20.
38.
SchwartzShalom H.ButenkoTania. 2014. “Values and Behavior: Validating the Refined Value Theory in Russia: Values and Behavior.”European Journal of Social Psychology44(7):799–813.
39.
SchwartzShalom H.CapraraGian VittorioVecchioneMichele. 2010. “Basic Personal Values, Core Political Values, and Voting: A Longitudinal Analysis.”Political Psychology31(3):421–52.
40.
SchwartzShalom H.CieciuchJan. 2016. “Values.” Pp. 106–19 in International Test Commission Handbook of Testing and Assessment, edited by LeongF. T. L.BartramD.CheungF.GeisingerK. F.IliescuD.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
SchwartzShalom H.CieciuchJanVecchioneMicheleDavidovEldadFischerRonaldBeierleinConstanzeRamosAlice, et al. 2012. “Refining the Theory of Basic Individual Values.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology103(4):663–88.
42.
SeoMyeong-GuCreedW. E. Douglas. 2002. “Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective.”Academy of Management Review27(2):222–47.
43.
SheeranPaschal. 2002. “Intention–Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review.”European Review of Social Psychology12(1):1–36.
44.
SineWesley D.DavidRobert J.2003. “Environmental Jolts, Institutional Change, and the Creation of Entrepreneurial Opportunity in the US Electric Power Industry.”Research Policy32(2):185–207.
45.
SkitkaLindaBaumanChristopherLytleBrad. 2009. “Limits on Legitimacy: Moral and Religious Convictions as Constraints on Deference to Authority.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology97:567–78.
46.
SteigerJames H.1990. “Structural Model Evaluation and Modification.”Multivariate Behavioral Research25:173–80.
47.
SuchmanMark C.1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.”Academy of Management Review20(3):571–610.
48.
SunshineJasonTylerTom R.2003. “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing.”Law & Society Review37(3):513–48.
49.
ThorntonPatricia H.2002. “The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics.”Academy of Management Journal45(1):81–101.
50.
ThorntonPatricia H.OcasioWilliamLounsburyMichael. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
TostLeigh Plunkett. 2011. “An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments.”Academy of Management Review36(4):686–710.
52.
TuckerLedyard R.LewisCharles. 1973. “A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis.”Psychometrika38(1):1–10.
53.
TylerTom R.2001. “A Psychological Perspective on the Legitimacy of Institutions and Authorities.” Pp. 416–36 in The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, edited by JostJ.MajorB.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
TylerTom R.2010. “Legitimacy and Rule Adherence: A Psychological Perspective on the Antecedents and Consequences of Legitimacy.” Pp. 265–86 in The Psychology of Justice and Legitimacy, edited by BobocelD. R.KayA. C.ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M.New York: Psychology Press.
55.
TylerTom R.BladerSteven L.2005. “Can Businesses Effectively Regulate Employee Conduct? The Antecedents of Rule Following in Work Settings.” Academy of Management Journal48(6):1143–58.
56.
TylerTom R.JacksonJonathan. 2014. “Popular Legitimacy and the Exercise of Legal Authority: Motivating Compliance, Cooperation, and Engagement.”Psychology, Public Policy, and Law20(1):78–95.
57.
VaiseyStephenMilesAndrew. 2014. “Tools from Moral Psychology for Measuring Personal Moral Culture.”Theory & Society43(3/4):311–32.
58.
VerplankenBasHollandRob W.2002. “Motivated Decision Making: Effects of Activation and Self-Centrality of Values on Choices and Behavior.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(3):434–47.
59.
ZelditchMorris. 2004. “Institutional Effects on the Stability of Organizational Authority.” Pp. 25–48 in Legitimacy Processes in Organizations. Vol. 22, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by JohnsonC.Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
60.
ZelditchMorrisJr.WalkerHenry A.1984. “Legitimacy and the Stability of Authority.”Advances in Group Processes20:217–49.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
