Time work has served as part of the conceptual framework for research that explores the connection between agency and temporal experience. We advance this line of inquiry by asking how temporal agency is refracted through the lens of gender when people use the Tinder dating app. Our analysis is based on 44 semistructured interviews with Tinder users in Romania conducted between 2019 and 2022. Tinder is designed to promote a fast-paced dating dynamic, but our findings show that people customize various dimensions of their temporal experience, including duration, frequency, sequence, timing, allocation, and stealing time. Users strive to develop temporal tactics that suit their dating aims while typically adhering to gendered expectations.
AggerBen. 2007. “Time Robbers, Time Rebels: Limits to Fast Capital.” Pp. 219–34 in 24/7: Time and Temporality in the Network Society, edited by HassanR.PurserR. E.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AuyeroJavier. 2012. Patients of the State: The Politics of Waiting in Argentina. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
CöbekGözde. 2023. “What Affect Proposes: Swiping as a Bodily Practice.”Emotions and Society5:185–201.
5.
CourtoisCédricTimmermansElisabeth. 2018. “Cracking the Tinder Code: An Experience Sampling Approach to the Dynamics and Impact of Platform Governing Algorithms.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication23:1–16.
6.
DavidGabyCambreCarolina. 2016. “Screened Intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic.”Social Media and Society2:1–11.
7.
DuguayStefanie. 2017. “Dressing Up Tinderella: Interrogating Authenticity Claims on the Mobile Dating App Tinder.”Information, Communication and Society20:351–67.
FlahertyMichael G.MeinertLotteDalsgårdAnne Line, eds. 2020. Time Work: Studies of Temporal Agency. Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.
10.
GardaMaria B.Veli-MattiKarhulahti. 2019. “Let’s Play Tinder! Aesthetics of a Dating App.”Games and Culture16:1–14.
11.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L.1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
13.
GoffmanErving. 1977. “The Arrangement between the Sexes.”Theory and Society4:301–31.
14.
HitlinStevenElderGlen H.Jr.2007. “Time, Self, and the Curiously Abstract Concept of Agency.”Sociological Theory25:170–91.
15.
HobbsMitchellOwenStephenGerberLivia. 2017. “Liquid Love? Dating Apps, Sex, Relationships, and the Digital Transformation of Intimacy.”Journal of Sociology53:271–84.
16.
HolmesMaryJamiesonLynnNatalierKristin. 2021. “Future Building and Emotional Reflexivity: Gendered or Queered Navigations of Agency in Non-normative Relationships.”Sociology55:734–50.
17.
HutchbyIan. 2001. “Technologies, Texts, and Affordances.”Sociology35:441–56.
18.
IllouzEva. 2007. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
19.
IllouzEva. 2019. The End of Love: A Sociology of Negative Relations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Jurkane-HobeinIveta. 2015. “When Less Is More: On Time Work in Long-Distance Relationships.”Qualitative Sociology38:185–203.
22.
KatzJack. 1988. “A Theory of Qualitative Methodology: The Social System of Analytic Fieldwork.” Pp. 127–48 in Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings, edited by EmersonR. M.Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
23.
KislevElyakim. 2019. Happy Singlehood: The Rising Acceptance and Celebration of Solo Living. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
24.
LahadKinneret. 2018. “Singlehood, Waiting, and the Sociology of Time.”Sociological Forum27:163–86.
25.
LamontEllen. 2014. “Negotiating Courtship: Reconciling Egalitarian Ideals with Traditional Gender Norms.”Gender & Society28:189–211.
26.
LeFebvreLeah E.2018. “Swiping Me Off My Feet: Explicating Relationship Initiation on Tinder.”Journal of Social and Personal Relationships35:1205–29.
27.
LoflandJohnSnowDavidAndersonLeonLoflandLyn H.2006. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 4th ed.Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
28.
LoisJennifer. 2010. “The Temporal Emotion Work of Motherhood: Homeschoolers’ Strategies for Managing Time Shortage.”Gender & Society24:421–46.
29.
MeadGeorge Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
MoenPhyllisLamJackAmmonsSamanthaKellyErin L.2013. “Time Work by Overworked Professionals: Strategies in Response to the Stress of Higher Status.”Work and Occupations40:79–114.
PalmerLauren. 2020. “Dating in the Age of Tinder: Swiping for Love?” Pp. 129–49 in Romantic Relationships in a Time of “Cold Intimacies,” edited by CarterJ.ChamL. Arocha., Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
PotarcaGina. 2021. “Online Dating Is Shifting Educational Inequalities in Marriage Formation in Germany.”Demography58:1977–2007.
34.
RanziniGiuliaLutzChristoph. 2017. “Love at First Swipe? Explaining Tinder Self-Presentation and Motives.”Mobile Media and Communication5:80–101.
35.
ReczekCorinne. 2020. “Sexual- and Gender-Minority Families: A 2010 to 2020 Decade in Review.”Journal of Marriage and Family82:300–25.
36.
RismanBarbara J.AtkinsonMaxine P.BlackwelderStephen P.1999. “Understanding the Juggling Act: Gendered Preferences and Social Structural Constraints.”Sociological Forum14:319–44.
37.
RitzerGeorge[1993]2013. The McDonaldization of Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
RosaHartmut. 2013. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
RoseneilSashaCrowhurstIsabelHellesundToneSantosAna CristinaStoilovaMariya. 2020. The Tenacity of the Couple-Norm: Intimate Citizenship Regimes in a Changing Europe. London: University College London Press.
40.
RosenfeldMichael J.2018. “Are Tinder and Dating Apps Changing Dating and Mating in the USA?”Families and Technology9:103–17.
41.
RosenfeldMichael J.ThomasReuben J.2012. “Searching for a Mate: The Rise of the Internet as a Social Intermediary.”American Sociological Review77:523–47.
42.
SchwartzBarry. 1974. “Waiting, Exchange, and Power: The Distribution of Time in Social Systems.”American Journal of Sociology79:841–70.
SumterSindy R.VandenboschLauraLigtenbergLoes. 2017. “Love Me Tinder: Untangling Emerging Adults’ Motivations for Using the Dating Application Tinder.”Telematics and Informatics34:67–78.
45.
TimmermansElisabethCourtoisCédric. 2018. “From Swiping to Casual Sex and/or Committed Relationships: Exploring the Experiences of Tinder Users.”Information Society34:59–70.
46.
TysonGarethPertaVasile C.HaddadiHamedSetoMichael C.2016. “A First Look at User Activity on Tinder.” Pp. 461–66 in Proceedings IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. San Francisco, CA: IEEE.
47.
van HooffJenny. 2020. “Swipe Right? Tinder, Commitment and the Commercialisation of Intimate Life.” Pp. 109–27 in Romantic Relationships in a Time of “Cold Intimacies,” edited by CarterJ.ChamL. Arocha, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
WalshFroma. 2012. Normal Family Processes: Growing Diversity and Complexity. New York: Guilford press.
49.
WardJanelle. 2017. “What Are You Doing on Tinder? Impression Management on a Matchmaking Mobile App.”Information, Communication and Society20:1644–59.
50.
WentlandJocelyn J.ReissingElke D.2011. “Taking Casual Sex Not Too Casually: Exploring Definitions of Casual Sexual Relationships.”Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality20:75–91.
WilliamsJames. 2018. Stand Out of Our Light: Freedom and Resistance in the Attention Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
YeoDominic Ee TienHinTsz Fung. 2018. “‘Mr Right Now’: Temporality of Relationship Formation on Gay Mobile Dating Apps.”Mobile Media & Communication6:3–18.
54.
ZuboffShoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
