Findings from five studies demonstrate that being an incidental token member in a transient group (e.g., a woman in a group of mostly men in a store line) lowers individuals’ private evaluations of products that typify the negative stereotypes of the tokenized identity. Incidental tokenism activates negative stereotypes associated with the tokenized identity, which subsequently leads to a desire to disassociate specifically from identity-linked products that typify those stereotypes as opposed to all identity-linked products in general. Consistent with this theorizing, similar results emerge when negative stereotypes are activated directly, and the effect is attenuated when tokenized individuals are self-affirmed. These results demonstrate the largely unexamined consequences of being a token group member on private evaluations (vs. public behavior) in subjective, preference-based (vs. objective, performance-based) domains.
ArielyDanLevavJonathan. 2000. “Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed.” Journal of Consumer Research27:279–90.
2.
BergerJohanHeathChip. 2008. “Who Drives Divergence? Identity Signaling, Outgroup Dissimilarity, and the Abandonment of Cultural Tastes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95:593–607.
3.
BilligMichaelTajfelHenri. 1973. “Social Categorization and Similarity in Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology3:27–52.
4.
BondRod. 2005. “Group Size and Conformity.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations8:331–54.
5.
CohenGeoffrey L.AronsonJoshuaSteeleClaude M.2000. “When Beliefs Yield to Evidence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26:1151–64.
6.
CohenLaurie L.SwimJanet K.1995. “The Differential Impact of Gender Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21:876–84.
7.
CookBeverly B.1978. “Women Judges: The End of Tokenism.” Pp. 84–105 in Women in the Courts, edited by HepperdeW. L.CritesL.Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
8.
CotaAlbert A.DionKenneth L.1986. “Salience of Gender and Sex Composition of Ad Hoc Groups: An Experimental Test of Distinctiveness Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50:770–76.
9.
CrockerJenniferMcGrawKathleen M.1984. “What’s Good for the Goose Is Not Good for the Gander: Solo Status as an Obstacle to Occupational Achievement for Males and Females.” American Behavioral Scientist27:357–69.
10.
CuddyAmy J. C.FiskeSusan T.2002. “Doddering but Dear: Process, Content, and Function in Stereotyping of Older Persons.” Pp. 3–26 in Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice against Older Persons, edited by NelsonT. D.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
EscalasJennifer E.BettmanJames R.2003. “You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands.” Journal of Consumer Psychology13:339–48.
12.
EscalasJennifer E.BettmanJames R.2005. “Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning.” Journal of Consumer Research32:378–89.
13.
FairhurstGail T.SnavelyB. Kay. 1983. “Majority and Token Minority Group Relationships: Power Acquisition and Communication.” Academy of Management Review8:292–300.
14.
FiskeSusan T.2014. “Schema-Triggered affect: Applications to Social Perception.” Affect and Cognition1:65–85.
15.
FlogeLillianeMerrillDeborah M.1986. “Tokenism Reconsidered: Male Nurses and Female Physicians in a Hospital Setting.” Social Forces64:925–47.
16.
FottlerMyron D.1976. “Attitudes of Female Nurses toward the Male Nurse: A Study of Occupational Segregation.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior17:98–110.
17.
HammondJudith A.MahoneyConstance W.1983. “Reward-Cost Balancing among Women Coalminers.” Sex Roles9:17–29.
18.
HopkinsNickReganMartinAbellJackie. 1997. “On the Context Dependence of National Stereotypes: Some Scottish Data.” British Journal of Social Psychology36:553–63.
19.
HummertMary L.GarstkaTeri A.ShanerJaye L.StrahmSharon. 1994. “Stereotypes of the Elderly Held by Young, Middle-Aged, and Elderly Adults.” Journal of Gerontology49:240–49.
20.
InzlichtMichaelBen-ZeevTalia. 2000. “A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males.” Psychological Science11:365–71.
21.
JurikNancy C.1985. “An Officer and a Lady: Organizational Barriers to Women Working as Correctional Officers in Men’s Prisons.” Social Problems32:375–88.
22.
KadushinAlfred. 1976. “Men in a Woman’s Profession.” Social Work21:440–47.
23.
KanterRosabeth M.1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology82:965–90.
24.
KingEden B.HeblMichelle R.GeorgeJennifer M.MatusikSharon F.2010. “Understanding Tokenism: Negative Consequences of Perceived Gender Discrimination in Male-Dominated Organizations.” Journal of Management36:537–54.
25.
KiteMary E.DeauxKayMieleMargaret. 1991. “Stereotypes of Young and Old: Does Age Outweigh Gender?”Psychology and Aging6:19–27.
26.
LocksleyAnneOrtizVilmaHepburnChristine. 1980. “Social Categorization and Discriminatory Behavior: Extinguishing the Minimal Intergroup Discrimination Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39:773–83.
27.
LorberJudith. 1984. Women Physicians: Careers, Status, and Power. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28.
LordCharles G.SaenzDelia S.1985. “Memory Deficits and Memory Surfeits: Differential Cognitive Consequences of Tokenism for Tokens and Observers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49:918–26.
29.
MartinSusan E.1982. “Breaking and Entering: Policewomen on Patrol.” Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
McGuireWilliam J.McGuireClaire V.ChildPamelaFujiokaTerry. 1978. “Salience of Ethnicity in the Spontaneous Self-Concept as a Function of One’s Ethnic Distinctiveness in the Social Environment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36:511–20.
31.
MurphyMary C.SteeleClaude M.GrossJames J.2007. “Signaling Threat: How Situational Cues Affect Women in Math, Science, and Engineering Settings. Psychological Science18:879–85.
32.
OttMarlies. M.1989. “Effects of the Male-Female Ratio at Work.” Psychology of Women Quarterly13:41–57.
33.
PaolacciGabrieleChandlerJesseIpeirotisPanagiotis G.2010. “Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Judgment and Decision Making5:411–19.
34.
PeerEyalVosgerauJoachimAcquistiAlessandro. 2014. “Reputation as a Sufficient Condition for Data Quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Behavior Research Methods46:1023–31.
35.
PuntoniStefanoSweldensStevenTavassoliNader T.2011. “Gender Identity Salience and Perceived Vulnerability to Breast Cancer.” Journal of Marketing Research48:413–24.
36.
RandelAmy E.2002. “Identity Salience: A Moderator of the Relationship between Group Gender Composition and Work Group Conflict.” Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior23:749–66.
37.
SaenzDelia S.1994. “Token Status and Problem-Solving Deficits: Detrimental Effects of Distinctiveness and Performance Monitoring.” Social Cognition12:61–74.
38.
SekaquaptewaDeniseThompsonMischa. 2002. “The Differential Effects of Solo Status on Members of High- and Low-Status Groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28:694–707.
39.
ShermanDavid A.NelsonLeif. D.SteeleClaude M.2000. “Do Messages about Health Risks Threaten the Self? Increasing the Acceptance of Threatening Health Messages via Self-Affirmation.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26:1046–58.
40.
ShihMargaretPittinskyTodd L.AmbadyNalini.1999. “Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance.” Psychological Science10:80–83.
41.
SpanglerEveGordonMarsha A.PipkinRonald M.1978. “Token Women: An Empirical Test of Kanter’s Hypothesis.” American Journal of Sociology84:160–70.
42.
SpencerSteven J.ZannaMark P.FongGeoffrey T.2005. “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89:845–51.
43.
StaymanDouglas M.DeshpandeRohit. 1989. “Situational Ethnicity and Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research16:361–71.
44.
SteeleClaude M.1988. “The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology21:261–302.
45.
SteeleClaude. M.AronsonJoshua. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology69:797–811.
46.
SteeleClaude M.LiuThomas J.1983. “Dissonance Processes as Self-Affirmation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45:5–19.
47.
SwanSuzanneWyerRobert S.Jr.1997. “Gender Stereotypes and Social Identity: How Being in the Minority Affects Judgments of Self and Others.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23:1265–76.
48.
TesserAbraham. 2000. “On the Confluence of Self-Esteem Maintenance Mechanisms.” Personality and Social Psychology Review4:290–99.
49.
WhiteKatherineArgoJennifer. 2009. “Social Identity Threat and Consumer Preferences.” Journal of Consumer Psychology19:313–25.
50.
WhiteKatherineDahlDarren W.2006. “To Be or Not Be? The Influence of Dissociative Reference Groups on Consumer Preferences.” Journal of Consumer Psychology16:404–14.
51.
WhiteKatherineLehmanDarrin R.2005. “Culture and Social Comparison Seeking: The Role of Self-Motives.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31:232–42.
52.
WootenDavid B.1995. “One-of-a-Kind in a Full House: Some Consequences of Ethnic and Gender Distinctiveness.” Journal of Consumer Psychology4:205–24.
ZhouRongrongSomanDilip. 2003. “Looking Back: Exploring the Psychology of Queuing and the Effect of the Number of People Behind.” Journal of Consumer Research29:517–30.
55.
ZimmerLynn. 1988. “Tokenism and Women in the Workplace: The Limits of Gender-Neutral Theory.” Social Problems35:64–77.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
