We examine whether anticipated gender discrimination—specifically, gendered sanctions for leadership failure—decreases women’s leadership ambitions. We find that laypeople expect that women leaders will be punished more harshly for failure than otherwise similar men. We also compare the leadership ambitions of women and men under conditions of benign and costly failure and find that leadership roles with costly failure—which implicitly have the potential for gendered sanctions for failure—disproportionally depress women’s leadership ambitions relative to men’s. Anticipated sanctions for failure mediate this effect, providing evidence that anticipated gender discrimination reduces women’s leadership ambitions. These results illuminate microlevel foundations of the stalled revolution by demonstrating how gendered beliefs about leadership are recreated, legitimized, and contribute to the dearth of women leaders. These findings also suggest that organizational responses to failure may produce gender differences in leadership ambitions and risk-taking behavior.
AndersonCameronSrivastavaSanjayBeerJennifer S.SpataroSandra E.ChatmanJennifer A.2006. “Knowing Your Place: Self-Perceptions of Status in Face-to-Face Groups.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology91(6):1094–110.
3.
BarshJoannaYeeLareina. 2012. Unlocking the Full Potential of Women at Work. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company.
4.
BaumeisterRoy F.BratslavskyEllenFinkenauerCatrinVohsKathleen D.2001. “Bad Is Stronger Than Good.”Review of General Psychology5(4):323–70.
5.
BrescollVictoria L.DawsonEricaUhlmannEric Luis. 2010. “Hard Won and Easily Lost: The Fragile Status of Leaders in Gender-Stereotype-Incongruent Occupations.”Psychological Science21(11):1640–42.
6.
BrescollVictoria L.UhlmannEric Luis. 2005. “Attitudes toward Traditional and Nontraditional Parents.”Psychology of Women Quarterly29(4):436–45.
ByrnesJames P.MillerDavid C.SchaferWilliam D.1999. “Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis.”Psychological Bulletin125(3):367–83.
9.
CassirerNaomiReskinBarbara. 2000. “High Hopes: Organizational Position, Employment Experiences, and Women’s and Men’s Promotion Aspirations.”Work and Occupations27(4):438–64.
10.
ChandlerJesseMuellerPamPaolacciGabriele. 2014. “Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers: Consequences and Solutions for Behavioral Researchers.”Behavior Research Methods46(1):112–30.
11.
CohenPhilip N.HuffmanMatt L.2007. “Working for the Woman? Female Managers and the Gender Wage Gap.”American Sociological Review72(5):681–704.
12.
CrosonRachelUriGneezy. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.”Journal of Economic Literature47(2):448–74.
13.
DamaskeSarah. 2011. For the Family?: How Class and Gender Shape Women’s Work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
EaganKevinStolzenbergEllen BaraRamirezJoseph J.AragonMelissa C.SuchardMaria Ramirezet al. 2016. The American Freshman: Fifty-Year Trends 1966–2015. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
15.
EaglyAlice H.CarliLinda L.2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
16.
EnglandPaula. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.”Gender & Society24(2):149–66.
17.
FinucaneMelissa L.SlovicPaulMertzC. K.FlynnJamesSatterfieldTheresa. 2000. “Gender, Race, and Perceived Risk: The ‘White Male’ Effect.”Health, Risk & Society2(2):159–72.
18.
FrickRobert W.1995. “Accepting the Null Hypothesis.”Memory & Cognition23(1):132–38.
19.
GuptaVishal K.HanSeongheeMortalSandra C.SilveriSabatino (Dino)TurbanDaniel B.2018. “Do Women CEOs Face Greater Threat of Shareholder Activism Compared to Male CEOs? A Role Congruity Perspective.”Journal of Applied Psychology103(2):228–36.
JackallRobert. 1988. Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.”Econometrica47(2):263–92.
23.
KanterRosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
24.
KennedyJessica A.McDonnellMary-HunterStephensNicole M.2016. “Does Gender Raise the Ethical Bar? Exploring the Punishment of Ethical Violations at Work.”Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management Research Paper No. 2770012. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2770012.
25.
KenrickDouglas T.TrostMelanie R.SundieJill M.2004. “Sex Roles as Adaptations: An Evolutionary Perspective on Gender Differences and Similarities.” Pp. 65–91 in The Psychology of Gender, edited by EaglyA. H.BeallA. E.SternbergR. J.New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
KonradAlison M.RitchieJ. EdgarLiebJr., PamelaCorrigallElizabeth. 2000. “Sex Differences and Similarities in Job Attitude Preferences: A Meta-Analysis.”Psychological Bulletin126(4):593–641.
27.
MacKinnonDavid P.DwyerJames H.1993. “Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies.”Evaluation Review17(2):144–58.
28.
MasonWinterSuriSiddharth. 2012. “Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.”Behavior Research Methods44(1):1–23.
PhelanJulie E.Moss-RacusinCorinne A.RudmanLaurie A.2008. “Competent yet Out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash toward Agentic Women.”Psychology of Women Quarterly32(4):406–13.
31.
PfefferJeffrey. 1992. Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32.
ReubenErnestoSapienzaPaolaZingalesLuigi. 2015. “Taste for Competition and the Gender Gap among Young Business Professionals.” NBER Working Paper No. 21695.
33.
RidgewayCecilia L.2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
RidgewayCecilia L.NakagawaSandra. 2017. “Is Deference the Price of Being Seen as Reasonable? How Status Hierarchies Incentivize Acceptance of Low Status.”Social Psychology Quarterly80(2):132–52.
35.
PaulRozinRoyzmanEdward B.2001. “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.”Personality and Social Psychology Review5(4):296–32.
SwimJanetSannaLawrence J.1996. “He’s Skilled, She’s Lucky: A Meta-Analysis of Observers’ Attributions for Women’s and Men’s Successes and Failures.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin22(5):507–19.
38.
ThébaudSarah. 2015. “Status Beliefs and the Spirit of Capitalism: Accounting for Gender Biases in Entrepreneurship and Innovation.”Social Forces94(1):61–86.
39.
TurcoCatherine J.2016. The Conversational Firm: Rethinking Bureaucracy in the Age of Social Media. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
VialAndrea C.NapierJaime L.BrescollVictoria L.2016. “A Bed of Thorns: Female Leaders and the Self-Reinforcing Cycle of Illegitimacy.”The Leadership Quarterly27(3):400–14.
42.
WilliamsJoan C.DempseyRachel. 2014. What Works for Women at Work: Four Patterns Working Women Need to Know. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
