Teams are ubiquitous in contemporary business, government, health care, and education settings; hence, the process of team formation is worth close examination. We propose models based in expectation states theory for the probability that a particular candidate (or subset of candidates) is selected from a pool of potential team members who are differentiated along diffuse status characteristics. The candidates may be equally qualified in other respects, but the ways in which they differ will be activated under specified conditions and influence their chances of selection. We use the “motherhood penalty” literature to illustrate the model and the inferences it affords. Our concluding discussion notes that although a step forward in understanding team selection, the model cannot be the whole story as “suitability,” a legitimate consideration in the team formation process, is unaddressed by an expectation states based model focused solely on attributions of competence as the drivers of teammate choice.
BalesRobert F.1950. Interaction Process Analysis; a Method for the Study of Small Groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BalesRobert F.1970. Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
3.
BalkwellJames W.1991. “From Expectations to Behavior: An Improved Postulate for Expectation States Theory.” American Sociological Review56:355–69.
4.
BernardStephen. 2016. Personal communication.
5.
BenardStephenCorrellShelley J.2010.“Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty.” Gender & Society24:616–46.
6.
BergerJoseph. 1992. “Expectations, Theory and Group Processes.” Social Psychology Quarterly55:3–11.
7.
BergerJosephCohenBernard P.ZelditchMorrisJr.1972. “Status Characteristics and Social Interaction.” American Sociological Review37:241–555.
8.
BergerJosephFişekM. Hamit. 2006. “Diffuse Status Characteristics and the Spread of Status Value: A Formal Theory.” American Journal of Sociology111:1038–79.
9.
BergerJosephFişekM. HamitFreeseLee. 1976. “Paths of Relevance and the Determination of Power and Prestige Orders.” Pacific Sociological Review19:45–62.
10.
BergerJosephFişekM. HamitNormanRobert Z.1989. “The Evolution of Status Expectations: A Theoretical Extension.” Pp. 100–30 in Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations, edited by BergerJ.ZelditchM.Jr.AndersonB.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
BergerJosephFişekM. HamitNormanRobert Z.ZelditchMorrisJr.1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
12.
BergerJosephRosenholtzSusan J.ZelditchMorrisJr.1980. “Status Organizing Processes.” Annual Review of Sociology6:479–508.
13.
BergerJosephWagnerDavid G.ZelditchMorrisJr.1985. “Introduction: Expectation States Theory: Review and Assessment.” Pp. 1–72 in Status, Rewards, and Influence: How Expectations Organize Behavior, edited by BergerJ.ZelditchM.JrSan Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
CohenBernard P.ZhouXueguang. 1991. “Status Processes in Enduring Work Groups.” American Sociological Review56:179–88.
15.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?”American Journal of Sociology112:1297–339.
16.
CorrellShelley J.RidgewayCecilia L.2003. “Expectation States Theory.” Pp. 29–51 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by DelamaterJ.New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
17.
DavisAmy E.AldrichHoward E.2008. “Status Characteristics and Contribution Recognitions within Startup Teams.” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research28 (11). Retrieved February2, 2016 (http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol28/iss11/1).
18.
EftekharMiladRonaghiFarnazSaberiAmin. 2015. “Team Formation Dynamics: A Study Using Online Learning Data.” Pp. 257–67 in Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Conference on Online Social Networks.
19.
Falk-KrzesinskiHolly J.BörnerKatyContractorNoshirFioreStephen M.HallKara L.KeytonJoannSpringBonnieStokolsDanielTrochimWilliamUzziBrian. 2010. “Advancing the Science of Team Science.” Clinical and Translational Science3:263–66.
20.
FararoThomas J.1972. “Status, Expectations, and Situation: A Formulation of the Structure Theory of Status Characteristics and Expectation States.” Quality and Quantity6:37–97.
21.
FişekM. HamitNormanRobert Z.Nelson-KilgerMax. 1992. “Status Characteristics and Expectation States Theory: A Priori Model Parameters and Test.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology16:285–303.
22.
FoschiMartha. 2009. “Gender, Performance Level, and Competence Standards in Task Groups.” Social Science Research38:447–57.
23.
FoschiMarthaLaiLarissaSigersonKirsten. 1994. “Gender and Double Standards in the Assessment of Job Applicants.” Social Psychology Quarterly57:326–39.
24.
FoschiMarthaValenzuelaJerilee. 2008.“Selecting Job Applicants: Effects from Gender, Self-Presentation, and Decision Type.” Social Science Research37:1022–38.
25.
FoschiMarthaValenzuelaJerilee. 2012. “Who Is the Better Applicant? Effects from Gender, Academic Record, and Type of Decision.” Social Science Research41:949–64.
26.
GuimeràRogerUzziBrianSpiroJarrettNunes AmaralLuis A.2005. “Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance.” Science308:607–702.
27.
HarknessSarah K.2016. “Discrimination in Lending Markets: Status and the Intersections of Gender and Race.” Social Psychology Quarterly79:81–93.
28.
HindsPamela J.CarleyKathleen M.KrackhardtDavidWholeyDoug. 2000. “Choosing Work Group Members; Balancing Similarity, Competence, and Familiarity.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes81:226–51.
29.
MayhewBruce H.McPhersonJ. MillerRotoloThomasSmith-LovinLynn. 1995. “Sex and Race Homogeneity in Naturally Occurring Groups.” Social Forces74:15–82.
30.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
31.
MeekerBarbara F.1994. “Performance Evaluations.” Pp. 95–118 in Group Processes: Sociological Analyses, edited by FoschiM.LawlerE.Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
32.
MelamedDavid. 2013. “Do Magnitudes of Difference on Status Characteristics Matter for Small Group Inequalities?” Social Science Research42:217–29.
33.
MelloAntonio S.RuckesMartin E.2006. “Team Composition.” Journal of Business79:1019–39.
34.
MilojevićStaša. 2014. “Principles of Scientific Research Team Formation and Evolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111:3984–89.
35.
RidgewayCecilia L.1978. “Conformity, Group-Oriented Motivation, and Status Attainment in Small Groups.” Social Psychology Quarterly41:175–88.
RuefMartinAldrichHoward E.CarterNancy M.2003. “The Structure of Founding Teams: Homophily, Strong Ties, and Isolation among US Entrepreneurs.” American Sociological Review68:195–222.
38.
SiegelJaneDubrovskyVitalyKieslerSaraMcGuireTimothy W.1986. “Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes37:157–87.
39.
SkvoretzJohn. 1988. “Models of Participation in Status-Differentiated Groups.” Social Psychology Quarterly51:43–57.
40.
StokolsDanielHallKara L.TaylorBrandie K.MoserRichard P.2008. “The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine35:S77–78.
41.
TorranceE. Paul. 1954. “Some Consequences of Power Differences on Decision Making in Permanent and Temporary Three-Man Groups.” Research Studies22:130–40.
42.
WebsterMurrayWhitmeyerJoseph M.2001. “Applications of Theories of Group Processes.” Sociological Theory19:250–70.
43.
ZelditchMorrisLauderdalePatrickStublarecStephen. 1980. “How Are Inconsistencies Between Status and Ability Resolved?”Social Forces58:1025–43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
