In conversational storytelling, the recipients are expected to show affiliation with the emotional stance displayed by the storytellers. We investigated emotional arousal-related autonomic nervous system responses in tellers and recipients of conversational stories. The data consist of 20 recordings of 45- to 60-minute dyadic conversations between female university and polytechnic students. Conversations were videotaped and analyzed by means of conversation analysis (CA), with a special emphasis on the verbal and nonverbal displays of affiliation in storytelling. Electrodermal activity in both participants was measured to estimate their arousal level. The results show that the verbal and nonverbal displays of affiliation decrease the storyteller’s but increase the recipient’s level of arousal. This means that the monitoring of the recipient actions in storytelling, shown by earlier CA studies, has a physiological correlate. We suggest that storytelling involves an emotional load, which the participants share physiologically in affiliative responses.
BavelasJanet B.CoatesLindaJohnsonTrudy. 2000. “Listeners as Co-Narrators.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79:941–52.
2.
BeebeBeatriceLachmannFrank. 2002. Infant Research and Adult Treatment. Co-Constructing Interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
3.
BenedekMathiasKaernbachChristian. 2010. “Decomposition of Skin Conductance Data by Means of Nonnegative Deconvolution.” Psychophysiology47:47–58.
4.
Ben-ShakharGershonElaadEitan. 2003. “The Validity of Psychophysiological Detection of Deception with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Applied Psychology88:131–51.
5.
BerntsonGary G.QuigleyKaren S.LozanoDave. 2007. “Cardiovascular Psychophysiology.” Pp. 182–210 in Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd ed., edited by CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G.BerntsonG. G.New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BradleyMargaret M.LangPeter J.2007. “Emotion and Motivation.” Pp. 581–607 in Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd ed., edited by CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL .G.BerntsonG. G.New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ButlerEmily A.EgloffBorisWilhelmFrank H.SmithNancy C.EricksonElizabeth A.GrossJames J.2003. “The Social Consequences of Expressive Suppression.” Emotion3:48–67.
8.
CacioppoJohn T.BerntsonGary G.AndersenBarbara L.1991. “Psychophysiological Approaches to the Evaluation of Psychotherapeutic Process and Outcome, 1991: Contributions from Social Psychophysiology.” Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology3:321–36.
9.
CohenJacob. 1968. “Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scale Agreement with Provision for Scaled Disagreement or Partial Credit.” Psychological Bulletin70:213–20.
10.
CollinsRandall. 2005. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Couper-KuhlenElizabeth. 2012. “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” Pp. 113–46 in Emotion in Interaction, edited by PeräkyläA.SorjonenM-L.New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
DawsonMichael E.SchellAnne M.FilionDiane L.2007. “The Electrodermal System.” Pp. 159–81 in Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd ed., edited by CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G.BerntsonG. G.New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DiMascioAlbertoBoydRichardGreenblattMilton. 1957. “Physiological Correlates of Tension and Antagonism during Psychotherapy. A Study of ‘Interpersonal Physiology.’” Psychosomatic Medicine19:99–104.
14.
GoffmanErving. 1955. “On Face-Work. An analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry18:2013–231.
GoffmanErving. 1983. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review48:1–17.
17.
GregorySatford W.Jr.KalkhoffWillHarknessSarah K.PaullJessica L.2009. “Targeted High and Low Speech Frequency Bands to Right and Left Ears Respectively Improve Task Performance and Perceived Sociability in Dyadic Conversations.” Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition14:423–40.
18.
HatfieldElaineCacioppoJohn T.RapsonRichard L.1994. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HeritageJohn. 2011. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” Pp. 159–83 in The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited by StiversT.MondadaL.SteensigJ.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
JeffersonGailLeeJohn. 1981. “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles-Telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’.” Journal of Pragmatics5:399–422.
21.
KennyDavid A.KashyDeborah A.CookWilliam L.2002. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
22.
KosfeldM.HeinrichsM.ZakP. J.FischbacherU.FehrE.2005. “Oxytocin Increases Trust in Humans.” Nature435:673–76.
23.
KreibigSylvia D.2010. “Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Emotion: A Review.” Biological Psychology84:394–421.
24.
KupetzM.2014. “Empathy Displays as Interactional Achievements—Multimodal and Sequential Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics61:4–34.
25.
LakinJ.ChartrandT. L.2003. “Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport.” Psychological Science14:334.
26.
LandisRichard J.KochGary G.1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics33:159–74.
27.
LevensonRobert W.GottmanJohn. 1983. “Marital Interaction: Physiological Linkage and Affective Exchange.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45:587–97.
28.
MarciCarl D.HamJacobMoranErinOrrScott P.2007. “Physiologic Correlates of Perceived Therapist Empathy and Social-Emotional Process during Psychotherapy.” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease195:103–11.
29.
PeräkyläAnssi. 2015. “From Narcissism to Face Work: Two Views on the Self in Social Interaction.” American Journal of Sociology121: 445-474
30.
PeräkyläAnssiRuusuvuoriJohanna. 2012. “Facial Expression and Interactional Regulation of Emotion.” Pp. 64–91 in Emotion in Interaction, edited by PeräkyläA.SorjonenM-L.New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
PeräkyläAnssiSorjonenMarja-Leena, eds. 2012. Emotion in Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
SchachterStanley. 1959. The Psychology of Affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
SchererKlaus R.2005. “What Are Emotions? And How Can They Be Measured?” Social Science Information44:693–727.
35.
SeltingMargret. 2010. “Affectivity in Conversational Storytelling: An Analysis of Displays of Anger or Indignation in Complaint Stories.” Pragmatics20:229–77.
36.
SeltingMargret. 2012. “Complaint Stories and Subsequent Complaint Stories with Affect Displays.” Journal of Pragmatics44:387–415.
37.
SimJuliusWrightChris C.2005. “The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements.” Physical Therapy85:257–68.
38.
SmithThomas S.2013. “Attachment, Interaction, and Synchronization: How Innate Mechanisms in Attachment Give Rise to Emergent Structure in Networks and Communities.” Pp. 243–54 in Handbook of Neurosociology, edited by FranksD. D.TurnerJ. H.Dordrecht: Springer.
39.
SpapéMichiel M.KivikangasJ. MatiasJärveläSimoKosunenIlkkaJacucciGiulioRavajaNiklas. 2013. “Keep Your Opponents Close: Social Context Affects EEG and fEMG Linkage in a Turn-Based Computer Game.” PLoS ONE8:e78795. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078795.
40.
SteigerJames H.1980. “Tests for Comparing Elements of a Correlation Matrix.” Psychological Bulletin87:245.
41.
StiversTanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction41:31–57.
42.
StiversTanya. 2015. “Coding Social Interaction: A Heretical Notion in Conversation Analysis?” Research on Language in Social Interaction48:1–19.
43.
TurnerJonathan H.2000. On the Origin of Human Emotions. A Sociological Inquiry into the Evolution of Human Affect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
TurnerJonathan H.StetsJan E.2005. The Sociology of Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
VoutilainenLiisaHenttonenPenttiKahriMikkoRavajaNiklasSamsMikkoPeräkyläAnssi. 2014. “Affective Stance, Ambivalence and Psychophysiology.” Journal of Pragmatics68:1–24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
