Picard, Fedor, and Ayzenberg (2016) provide a review of the existing literature on the relationship between electrodermal activity (EDA) and affective processes and present data from a number of studies suggesting strong lateralization in EDA reactivity to emotion. As the authors note, their manuscript extends previous work suggesting the concept of arousal is more complex than previously thought, and they provide a framework for interpreting such complexities within the context of a multiple arousal theory.
BerntsonG. G.CacioppoJ. T. (2007). Integrative physiology: Homeostasis, allostasis and the orchestration of systemic physiology. In CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G.BerntsonG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 433–452). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BerntsonG. G.SarterM.CacioppoJ. T. (2003). Ascending visceral regulation of cortical affective information processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18(8), 2103–2109.
3.
CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G.StonebrakerT. B.PettyR. E. (1987). Self-report and cardiovascular measures of arousal: Fractionation during residual arousal. Biological Psychology, 25(2), 135–151.
4.
CannonW. B. (1929). Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiological Reviews, 9(3), 399–431.
5.
NormanG. J.BerntsonG. G.CacioppoJ. T. (2014). Emotion, somatovisceral afference, and autonomic regulation. Emotion Review, 6, 113–123.
6.
PfaffD. W.MartinE. M.FaberD. (2012). Origins of arousal: Roles for medullary reticular neurons. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(8), 468–476.
7.
PicardR. W.FedorS.AyzenbergY. (2016). Multiple arousal theory and daily-life electrodermal activity asymmetry. Emotion Review, 8(1): pp. 62–75.
