When individuals’ identities are not verified, most theories and research suggest that they feel bad when others evaluate them more negatively than how they see themselves. It is less clear whether they feel good or bad when others evaluate them more positively than how they see themselves. We examine people’s emotional reactions to nonverifying feedback across seven studies that include both a survey and a laboratory component. In the survey, individuals feel a little better when others slightly overrate them (an enhancement effect). In both the survey and laboratory, individuals also feel bad for being highly overrated (a consistency effect), and this consistency effect overpowers the enhancement effect. The consistency effect emerges when we measure: (1) individuals’ identity meanings, (2) their responses to how they think others see them (reflected appraisals), and (3) the meanings in the situation that are relevant to an individual’s identity (identity-relevant situational meanings).
AllisonScott T.MessickDavid M.1988. “The Feature-Positive Effect, Attitude Strength, and Degree of Perceived Consensus.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin14:231–41.
2.
AndersonChristopher J.2003. “The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion.” Psychological Bulletin129:139–67.
3.
AquinoKarlII ReedAmericus. 2002. “The Self-Importance of Moral Identity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83:1423–40.
4.
BurkePeter J.StetsJan E.2009. Identity Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
CooleyCharles H.[1902] 1964. Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Schocken Books.
6.
FazioRussell H.ShermanSteven J.HerrPaul M.1982. “The Feature-Positive Effect in the Self-Perception Process: Does Not Doing Matter as Much as Doing?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42:404–11.
7.
GreeneJoshua D.SommervilleR. BrianNystromLeigh E.DarleyJohn M.CohenJonathan D.2001. “An Fmri Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment.” Science293:2105–8.
8.
HauserMarc. 2006. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our University Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: Harper Collins.
9.
HeiseDavid R.CalhanCassandra. 1995. “Emotion Norms in Interpersonal Events.” Social Psychology Quarterly58:223–40.
10.
KalkhoffWillWillerRobb. 2008. “Deterring Deviance: Rationality and Self-Control.” Pp. 39–61 in Experiments in Criminology and Law: A Research Revolution, edited by HorneC.LovagliaM. J.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
11.
KwangTracySwannWilliam B.2010. “Do People Embrace Praise Even When They Feel Unworthy? A Review of Critical Tests of Self-Enhancement Versus Self-Verification.” Personality and Social Psychology Review14:263–80.
12.
RobinsonDawn T.Smith-LovinLynnWisecupAllison K.2006. “Affect Control Theory.” Pp. 179–202 in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, edited by StetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H.New York: Springer.
13.
RossLee D.1977. “The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process.” Pp. 173–220 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by BerkowitzL.New York: Academic Press.
14.
SedikidesConstantineGreggAiden P.2008. “Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought.” Perspectives in Psychological Science3:112–16.
15.
ShraugerJ. S.1975. “Responses to Evaluation as a Function of Initial Self-Perceptions.” Psychological Bulletin82:581–96.
16.
SprancaMarkMinskElisaBaronJonathan. 1991. “Omission and Commission in Judgment and Choice.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology27:76–105.
17.
StetsJan E.2006. “Identity Theory and Emotions.” Pp. 203–23 in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, edited by StetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H.New York: Springer.
18.
StetsJan E.2011. “Applying Identity Theory to Moral Acts of Commission and Omission.” Advances in Group Processes28:97–124.
19.
StetsJan E.AsencioEmily K.2008. “Consistency and Enhancement Processes in Understanding Emotions.” Social Forces86:1055–58.
20.
StetsJan E.CarterMichael J.2011. “The Moral Self: Applying Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly74:192–215.
21.
StetsJan E.CarterMichael J.2012. “A Theory of the Self for the Sociology of Morality.” American Sociological Review77:120–40.
22.
StetsJan E.OsbornShelley N.2008. “Injustice and Emotions Using Identity Theory.” Advances in Group Processes25:151–79.
23.
SwannWilliam B.Jr.BuhrmesterMichael D.2011. “Self-Verification: The Search for Coherence.” Pp. 405–24 in Handbook of Self and Identity, edited by LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P.New York: The Guilford Press.
24.
ThomasWilliam IsaacThomasDorothy Swain. 1928. The Child in America. New York: Knopf.
25.
TurnerJonathan H.StetsJan E.2005. The Sociology of Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
WalkerLawrence J.HennigKarl H.2004. “Differing Conceptions of Moral Exemplarity: Just, Brave, and Caring.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology86:629–47.
27.
WalkerLawrence J.PittsRussell C.HennigKarl H.MatsubaM. Kyle. 1995. “Reasoning about Morality and Real-Life Moral Problems.” Pp. 37–407 in Morality in Everyday Life: Developmental Perspectives, edited by KillenM.HartD.New York: Cambridge University Press.
