Sustainability standards have been criticized as being complex and overlapping, with unclear metrics and messy timelines—all of which have led to sustainability shortfalls. As part of the special issue on addressing sustainability metric shortcomings, we develop a hybridizing protocol for sustainability standards that elicits community stakeholder ideological predispositions, preferences, ratings, and heuristics and injects them into a prioritized, vetted metric in order to reduce immediate and longer-range life cycle impacts of corporate operations in the local ecosystem. We demonstrate our method using a quasi-field experiment, conducted by expert intermediary facilitators, in which community members co-design oil sands wetland reclamation and their choices are integrated into life cycle assessments (LCAs) of wetland designs and remediation products. Hybridizing LCA with local co-design not only generates an effective wetland-material choice, but reduces life cycle impacts and increases the likelihood of community acceptance.
AndrewsEvan (2009). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: Social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and life cycle costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development. Paris: UNEP/Earthprint.
AnsariShahzadWijenFrankGrayBarbara (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons”. Organization Science, 24, 1014–1040.
4.
ArnoldNadineLocontoAllison (2021). Serving magically perfect fruit globally: Local nesting in translating multiple standards. Organization Studies, 42, 327–349.
5.
AugustineGraceSoderstromSaraMilnerDanielWeberKlaus (2019). Constructing a distant future: Imaginaries in geoengineering. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 1930–1960.
6.
BacqSophieAguileraRuth V. (2022). Stakeholder governance for responsible innovation: A theory of value creation, appropriation, and distribution. Journal of Management Studies, 59, 29–60.
7.
BanerjeeS. BobbyIyerEwarKashyapRajiv (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67, 106–122.
8.
BansalPratimaRothKendall (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736.
9.
BansalPratimaSongHee-Chan (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 105–149.
10.
BattilanaJulieLeeMatthew (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 397–441.
11.
Benoît NorrisCatherineTraverzoMarziaNeugebauerSabrinaEkenerElisabethSchaubroeckThomasGarridoSara R. (2020). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products and organizations 2020. Paris: UNEP.
12.
BhuiyanTazul I.TakJin K.SessaregoSebastianHarfieldDonHillJosephine M. (2017). Adsorption of acid-extractable organics from oil sands process-affected water onto biomass-based biochar: Metal content matters. Chemosphere, 168, 1337–1344.
13.
BowenFrancesNewenham-KahindiAloysiusHerremansIrene (2010). When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 297–318.
14.
BrunssonNilsRascheAndreasSeidlDavid (2012). The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organization Studies, 33, 613–632.
15.
BuschTimoOrlitzkyMarc (2019). On the links between the corporate environmental and financial performance: Camera or mirror? In McWilliamsAbigailRuppDeborah E.SiegelDonald S.StahlGünter K.WaldmanDavid A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Psychological and organizational perspectives (pp. 308–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
Campos-GuzmánVerónicaGarcía-CáscalesM. SocorroEspinosaNievesUrbinaAntonio (2019). Life cycle analysis with multi-criteria decision making: A review of approaches for the sustainability evaluation of renewable energy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 343–366.
17.
CasadesúsMartaÁlvarezMaría D.GarridoNúriaMolinsGemmaMacanásJorgeColomXavier, et al. (2019). Environmental impact assessment of sound absorbing nonwovens based on chicken feathers waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 489–499.
18.
ChatterjeeAaronDurandRodolpheLevineDavid I.TouboulSamuel (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 1597–1614.
19.
ChatterjeeAaronGhoshAnjanLecaBernard B. (2023). Double weaving: A bottom-up process of connecting locations and scales to mitigate grand challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 66, 797–828.
20.
ChatterjeeAaronToffelMichael W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 917–945.
21.
ChenChien-MingDelmasMagali A. (2011). Measuring corporate social performance: An efficiency perspective. Production and Operations Management, 20, 789–804.
22.
ClementRonald (2005). The lessons from stakeholder theory for US business leaders. Business Horizons, 48, 255–264.
23.
CorbellaClaraPuigagutJaumeGarfíMarianna (2017). Life cycle assessment of constructed wetland systems for wastewater treatment coupled with microbial fuel cells. Science of the Total Environment, 584, 355–362.
CostaDanieleQuinteiroPaulaDiasAna C. (2019). A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues. Science of the Total Environment, 686, 774–787.
26.
da Silva MedeirosDeborah C. C.NzediegwuChristoperBenallyChelseaMesseleSelamawit A.KwakJing-HyeobNaethM. Anne, et al. (2022). Pristine and engineered biochar for the removal of contaminants co-existing in several types of industrial wastewaters: A critical review. Science of the Total Environment, 809, 151120.
27.
De BakkerFrank G. A.RascheAndreasPonteStefano (2019). Multi-stakeholder initiatives on sustainability: A cross-disciplinary review and research agenda for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29, 343–383.
28.
DebenestTimothéeTurcottePatriceGagnéFrancoisGagnonChistianBlaiseChristian (2012). Ecotoxicological impacts of effluents generated by oil sands bitumen extraction and oil sands lixiviation onPseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Aquatic Toxicology, 112, 83–91.
29.
DelmasMagali A. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35, 91–119.
30.
DelmasMagali A.ToffelMichael W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027–1055.
31.
DominguesAna RitaMarquesPedroGarciaRitaFreireFaustoDiasLuis C. (2015). Applying multi-criteria decision analysis to the life-cycle assessment of vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 749–759.
32.
DunlapRiley E.Van LiereKentMertigAngela G.JonesRobert E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.
33.
DurandRudolpheHawnOlgaIoannouIoannis (2019). Willing and able: A general model of organizational responses to normative pressures. Academy of Management Review, 44, 299–320.
34.
EinfeldColetteBlomkampEmma (2022). Nudge and co-design: Complementary or contradictory approaches to policy innovation?Policy Studies, 43(5), 1–19.
35.
ErgeneSerayBanerjeeSubhabrata B.HoffmanAndrew J. (2021). (Un)sustainability and organization studies: Towards a radical engagement. Organization Studies, 42, 1319–1335.
36.
FreemanR. Edward (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
37.
FungArchon (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.
GondJean-PascalBrèsLuc (2020). Designing the tools of the trade: How corporate social responsibility consultants and their tool-based practices created market shifts. Organization Studies, 41, 703–726.
GrandyJake B.HiattShon R. (2023). The radical flank revisited: How regulatory discretion shapes the effectiveness of social activism on business outcomes. Organization Science, 35, 769–1202.
GruberMarcDe LeonNickGeorgeGerardThompsonPaul (2015). Managing by design. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 1–7.
44.
GrushinaSvetlana V. (2017). Collaboration by design: Stakeholder engagement in GRI sustainability reporting guidelines. Organization & Environment, 30, 366–385.
45.
GundesSelin (2016). The use of life cycle techniques in the assessment of sustainability. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 916–922.
46.
HaighNardia (2019). Scenario planning for climate change: A guide for strategists. London: Routledge.
47.
HahnTobiasPinkseJonatanPreussLutzFiggeFrank (2016). Ambidexterity for corporate social performance. Organization Studies, 37, 213–235.
48.
HedbergLeanne M.LounsburyMichael (2021) Not just small potatoes: Cultural entrepreneurship in the moralizing of markets. Organization Science, 32, 433–454.
49.
HendryJamie R. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 79–99.
50.
HengenTylerSieverdingHeidi L.StoneJames J. (2016). Lifecycle assessment analysis of engineered stormwater control methods common to urban watersheds. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 142, 04016016.
51.
HengstIris-ArianeJarzabkowskiPaulaHoeglMartinMuethelMiriam (2020). Toward a process theory of making sustainability strategies legitimate in action. Academy of Management Journal, 63, 246–271.
52.
HerremansIrene M.NazariJamalMahmoudianFereshte (2016). Stakeholder relationships, engagement, and sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 417–435.
53.
HoffmanAndrew J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–371.
54.
HoffmanAndrew J.GeorgSusse (2018). Business and the natural environment: A research overview. London: Routledge.
55.
HoffmanAndrew J.JenningsP. Devereaux (2018). Re-engaging with sustainability in the anthropocene era: An institutional approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Howard-GrenvilleJenniferNelsonAndrew J.EarleAndrew G.HaackJulie A.YoungDouglas M. (2017). “If chemists don’t do it, who is going to?” Peer-driven occupational change and the emergence of green chemistry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62, 524–560.
57.
Huertas-ValdiviaIreneFerrariAnna MarieSettembre-BlundoDavideGarcía-MuiñaFernando E. (2020). Social life-cycle assessment: A review by bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12, 6211.
JenningsP. DevereauxHoffmanAndrew J. (2017). Institutional theory and the natural environment: Building research through tensions and paradoxes. In GreenwoodRoystonOliverChristineLawrenceThomas B.MeyerRenate E. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd edition, pp. 759–785). London: SAGE.
60.
JiangRuihua J.BansalPratima (2003). Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1047–1067.
61.
JonesTom M.HarrisonJeffreyFelpsWill (2018). How applying instrumental stakeholder theory can provide sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 43, 371–391.
KaplanSarah (2020). Beyond the business case for social responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(1), 1–4.
64.
KimA.BansalP.HaughH. (2019). No time like the present: How a present time perspective can foster sustainable development. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 607–634.
65.
KingAndrew A.LenoxMichael J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 698–716.
66.
KingAndrew A.LenoxMichael J.TerlaakAnn (2005). The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1091–1106.
67.
LarsenVibeke G.TollinNicolaSattrupPeter A.BirkvedMortenHolmboeTine (2022). What are the challenges in assessing circular economy for the built environment? A literature review on integrating LCA, LCC and S-LCA in life cycle sustainability assessment, LCSA. Journal of Building Engineering, 50, 104203.
68.
LeeBrandon H.HiattShon R.LounsburyMichael (2017). Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organization Science, 28, 447–470.
69.
LeeMin-Dong P.LounsburyMichael (2015). Filtering institutional logics: Community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste. Organization Science, 26, 847–866.
70.
LefsrudLeanne M.MeyerRenate E. (2012). Science or science fiction? Professionals’ discursive construction of climate change. Organization Studies, 33, 1477–1506.
71.
LiuNing (2021). Institutional intermediaries and firm choices in response to regulations. Academy of Management Journal, 64, 981–1007.
72.
MaguireSteveHardyCynthia (2013). Organizing processes and the construction of risk: A discursive approach. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 231–255.
73.
MarchJames G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
74.
McQueenAndrew D.HendrikseMaasGaspariDaniel P.KinleyCiera M.RodgersJohn H.Jr.CastleJames W. (2017). Performance of a hybrid pilot-scale constructed wetland system for treating oil sands process-affected water from the Athabasca oil sands. Ecological Engineering, 102, 152–165.
75.
MitchellRonald K.AgleBradley R.WoodDonna J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
76.
Nilsson-LindénHannaDiedrichAndreasBaumannHenrikke (2021). Life cycle work: A process study of the emergence and performance of life cycle practice. Organization & Environment, 34, 99–122.
77.
NikiforukAndrew (2010). Tar sands: Dirty oil and the future of a continent. Vancouver: Greystone Books Ltd.
78.
OdziemkowskaKateDorobantuSinziana (2021). Contracting beyond the market. Organization Science, 32, 776–803.
79.
OstromElinor (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
ParmarBidhan L.FreemanR. EdwardHarrisonJeffrey S.WicksAndrew C.PurnellLaurenDe ColleSimone (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 403–445.
81.
PeregoPaoloKennedySteveWhitemanGail (2016). A lot of icing but little cake? Taking integrated reporting forward. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 53–64.
82.
Perez-BatresLuis A.DohJonathan P.MillerVan V.PisaniMichael J. (2012). Stakeholder pressures as determinants of CSR strategic choice: Why do firms choose symbolic versus substantive self-regulatory codes of conduct?Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 157–172.
83.
RaaijmakersAafke G. M.VermeulenPatrick A. M.MeeusMarius T. H.ZietsmaCharlene (2015). I need time! Exploring pathways to compliance under institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 85–110.
84.
RawhouserHansCummingsMichael E.HiattShon R. (2019). Does a common mechanism engender common results? Sustainable development trade-offs in the global carbon offset market. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5, 514–529.
85.
ReineckeJulianeAnsariShaz (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 618–648.
86.
ReineckeJulianeManningStephanVon HagenOliver (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33, 791–814.
87.
SandholtzKurt W. (2012). Making standards stick: A theory of coupled vs. decoupled compliance. Organization Studies, 33, 655–679.
88.
SavageGrant T.BunnMichele D.GrayBarbaraXiaoQianWangSijunWilsonElizabeth J., et al. (2010). Stakeholder collaboration: Implications for stakeholder theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 21–26.
89.
SchüsslerElkeRülingCharles-ClemensWittnebenBettina B. F. (2014). On melting summits: The limitations of field-configuring events as catalysts of change in transnational climate policy. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 140–171.
90.
SharkeyAmandaKovácsBalázsHsuGreta (2023). Expert critics, rankings, and review aggregators: The changing nature of intermediation and the rise of markets with multiple intermediaries. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 1–36.
91.
SimairMonique C.ParrottJoannele RouxMignonGuptaVarunFrankRichard A.PeruKerry M., et al. (2021). Treatment of oil sands process affected waters by constructed wetlands: Evaluation of designs and plant types. Science of the Total Environment, 772, 145508.
92.
SimonsTalVermeulenPatrick A. M.KnobenJoris (2016). There’s no beer without a smoke: Community cohesion and neighboring communities’ effects on organizational resistance to antismoking regulations in the Dutch hospitality industry. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 545–578.
93.
Slade ShantzAngelique F.KistruckGeoffrey M.PachecoDesiré F.WebbJustin W. (2020). How formal and informal hierarchies shape conflict within cooperatives: A field experiment in Ghana. Academy of Management Journal, 63, 503–529.
94.
SmithWendy K.BesharovMarya L. (2019). Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 1–44.
95.
TenbrunselAnn E.Wade-BenzoniKimberly A.MessickDavid M.BazermanMax H, (2000). Understanding the influence of environmental standards on judgments and choices. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 854–866.
96.
TerlaakAnn (2007). Order without law? The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired firm behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 32, 968.
WallsJudith L.PhanPhillip H.BerronePascual (2011). Measuring environmental strategy: Construct development, reliability, and validity. Business & Society, 50, 71–115.
99.
WeberBob (2014, February20). Federal study says oil sands toxins are leaching into groundwater, Athabasca River. The Globe & Mail.
100.
WeberKlausHeinzeKathryn L.DeSouceyMichaela (2008). Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 529–567.
101.
WhitemanGailCooperWilliam H. (2016). Decoupling rape. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2, 115–154.
102.
WijenFrank (2014). Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Academy of Management Review, 39, 302–323.
WilliamsAmandaWhitemanGailParkerJohn N. (2019). Backstage interorganizational collaboration: Corporate endorsement of the sustainable development goals. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5, 367–395.
105.
WuChongchongDe VisscherAlexGatesIan D. (2019). On naphthenic acids removal from crude oil and oil sands process-affected water. Fuel, 253, 1229–1246.
106.
YoungScott T.DhandaK. KathyHollenhorstSteve (2023). Business and sustainability (2nd ed.) Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
107.
ZangheliniGuilherme M.CherubiniEdivanSoaresSebastião R. (2018). How multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is aiding life cycle assessment (LCA) in results interpretation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 609–622.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
