The gender pay gap among firms’ upper echelons is a prominent issue not only because it concerns equality in the workplace, but also because it may impact firms’ culture and performance. Responding to calls to better understand how stakeholder expectations and pressures might influence the gender pay gap, this study examines the role of a key stakeholder group, i.e., financial analysts, in curbing the executive gender pay gap. Drawing on the stakeholder and attention-based views of the firm, we contend that analyst coverage may counter the pay gap by: (a) raising other stakeholders’ attention on discriminatory pay-setting practices; and (b) reducing information asymmetries in the executive labor market. Both firm- and individual-level econometric analyses on a sample of 38,211 executives working in 3,473 firms support our hypothesis: an increase in analyst firm coverage helps to reduce the gender pay gap among the top executives of S&P 1500 firms between 1992 and 2016. Post-hoc analyses—that use the closure of brokerage houses as an exogeneous shock—lend further support to our claims. Our results advance the literature at the nexus of the stakeholder theory and attention-based view of the firm by unveiling the role of intermediaries in channeling the limited stakeholder attention to certain firms, contributing to the development of a stakeholder-based theory of executive pay.
AbrahamMabel (2017). Pay formalization revisited: Considering the effects of manager gender and discretion on closing the gender wage gap. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 29–54.
2.
AckerJoan (2012). Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31, 214–224.
BakerMichaelHalberstamYoshKroftKoryMasAlexandreMessacarDerekConleyHazel, et al. (2019). Pay transparency and the gender gap. NBER Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
5.
BeckerGary S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1), S33–S58.
6.
BennerMary J.RanganathanRam (2012). Offsetting illegitimacy? How pressures from securities analysts influence incumbents in the face of new technologies. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 213–233.
7.
BermissY. SekouMurmannJohann P. (2015). Who matters more? The impact of functional background and top executive mobility on firm survival. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1697–1716.
8.
BertrandMarianneHallockKevin F. (2001). The gender gap in top corporate jobs. ILR Review, 55, 3–21.
9.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55, 789–865.
10.
BrauerMatthiasWiersemaMargarethe (2018). Analyzing analyst research: A review of past coverage and recommendations for future research. Journal of Management, 44, 218–248.
11.
BudigMichelle J.EnglandPaula (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204–225.
12.
BugejaMartinDa SilvaRosaRaymondDuongLienIzanH. Y. (2012). CEO compensation from M&As in Australia. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(9), 1298–1923.
13.
BuylTineBooneChristopheWadeJames B. (2015). Non-CEO executive mobility: The impact of poor firm performance and TMT attention. European Management Journal, 33, 257–267.
CastillaEmilio J. (2015). Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organization Science, 26, 311–333.
16.
ChenTaoHarfordJarradLinChen (2015). Do analysts matter for governance? Evidence from natural experiments. Journal of Financial Economics, 115, 383–410.
17.
ChoTheresa S.HambrickDonald C. (2006). Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17, 453–469.
18.
DamanpourFariborzSchneiderMarguerite (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 19, 495–522.
19.
DeephouseDavid L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091–1112.
20.
DennissenMarjoleinBenschopYvonnevan den BrinkMarieke (2020). Rethinking diversity management: An intersectional analysis of diversity networks. Organization Studies, 41, 219–240.
21.
DezsőCristian L.RossDavid GaddisUribeJose (2016). Is there an implicit quota on women in top management? A large-sample statistical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 98–115.
22.
DreherGeorge F.CoxTaylor H. (2000). Labor market mobility and cash compensation: The moderating effects of race and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 890–900.
23.
DyckAlexanderMorseAdairZingalesLuigiDonohueJohnHartzellJayKarpoffJonathan (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud?Journal of Finance, 65, 2213–2253.
24.
ElliottCaroleSteadValerie (2018). Constructing women’s leadership representation in the UK press during a time of financial crisis: Gender capitals and dialectical tensions. Organization Studies, 39, 19–45.
25.
ElviraMarta M.SaportaIshak (2001). How does collective bargaining affect the gender pay gap?Work and Occupations, 28, 469–490.
26.
ErtugGokhanMaoretMassimo (2020). Do coaches in the national basketball association actually display racial bias? A replication and extension. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6, 206–234.
27.
FrancisBill B.HasanIftekharSharmaZenu (2020). Are female CFOs different? Evidence from gender pay gaps. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631951
28.
FreemanR. Edward (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
29.
GayleGeorge-LeviGolanLimorMillerRobert A. (2012). Gender differences in executive compensation and job mobility. Journal of Labor Economics, 30, 829–872.
GoldinClaudia (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review, 104, 1091–1119.
32.
GraffinScott D.BoivieStevenCarpenterMason A. (2013). Examining CEO succession and the role of heuristics in early-stage CEO evaluation. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 383–403.
33.
GrahamJohn R.LiSiQiuJiaping (2012). Managerial attributes and executive compensation. Review of Financial Studies, 25, 144–186.
34.
GrosserKateMoonJeremy (2005). Gender mainstreaming and corporate social responsibility: Reporting workplace issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 327–340.
35.
GrosserKateMoonJeremy (2008). Developments in company reporting on workplace gender equality? A corporate social responsibility perspective. Accounting Forum, 32, 179–198.
36.
GuptaVishal K.MortalSandra C.GuoXiaohu (2018). Revisiting the gender gap in CEO compensation: Replication and extension of Hill, Upadhyay, and Beekun’s (2015) work on CEO gender pay gap. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 2036–2050.
37.
GuryanJonathanCharlesKerwin Kofi (2013). Taste-based or statistical discrimination: The economics of discrimination returns to its roots. Economic Journal, 123(572), F417–F432.
38.
HarinathaG. (2008). Novo Nordisk A/S, life science analytics (Report No. 13968181). Retrieved August, 2020, from thomsonone.com
39.
HarrisonJeffrey S.FreemanR. Edward (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 479–485.
40.
HeJieTianXuan (2013). The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109, 856–878.
41.
HeilmanMadeline E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135.
42.
HillAaron D.UpadhyayArun D.BeekunRafik I. (2015). Do female and ethnically diverse executives endure inequity in the CEO position or do they benefit from their minority status? An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1115–1134.
43.
HillAaronUpadhyayArunBeekunRafik (2022). Revisiting the gender gap in CEO compensation: Rectifying conflictive findings by correcting Gupta, Mortal, and Guo’s (2018) misapplication of absorption in unbalanced panel. Managerial Finance, 48, 1186–1205.
44.
HongHarrisonKacperczykMarcin (2010). Competition and bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 1683–1725.
45.
HooblerJennyWayneSandyLemmonGrace (2009). Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 939–957.
46.
HuangAllen H.ZangAmy Y.ZhengRong (2014). Evidence on the information content of text in analyst reports. Accounting Review, 89, 2151–2180.
47.
JonesThomas M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.
48.
KangSungchang (2021). CEO compensation gap between gender and women’s risk-averse tendency. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3854319
49.
KaplanSarah (2008). Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 672–695.
50.
LeslieLisa M.ManchesterColleen F.DahmPatricia C. (2017). Why and when does the gender gap reverse? Diversity goals and the pay premium for high potential women. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 402–432.
51.
MadsenPeter M.RodgersZachariah J. (2015). Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 776–794.
52.
MatsaDavid A.MillerAmalia R. (2011). Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. American Economic Review, 101, 635–639.
53.
MerluzziJenniferPhillipsDamon J. (2022). Early career leadership advancement: Evidence of incongruity penalties toward young, single women professionals. Organization Studies, 43, 1719–1743.
54.
Minkabu. (2019). Equity annual report: Cisco systems (Report No. 67947441). Minkabu The Infonoid. Retrieved August, 2020, from thomsonone.com
55.
MunEunmiJungJiwook (2018). Change above the glass ceiling: Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity in Japanese firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63, 409–440.
56.
Muñoz-BullonFernando (2010). Gender-compensation differences among high-level executives in the United States. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 49, 346–370.
57.
MurphyKevin J.ZabojnikJan (2004). CEO pay and appointments: A market-based explanation for recent trends. American Economic Review, 94, 192–196.
58.
OcasioWilliam (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206.
59.
OcasioWilliam (2011). Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22, 1286–1296.
60.
PennerAndrewPetersenTrondHermansenAre SkeieRaineyAnthonyBozaIstvánElviraMarta M., et al. (2023). Within-job gender pay inequality in 15 countries. Nature Human Behavior, 7, 184–189.
61.
PhadkeH. (2017). More than a diversity memo: Tracking Google’s human capital performance with the SASB materiality view (Report No. 63231716). TruValue Labs. Retrieved August, 2020, from thomsonone.com
62.
PhelpsEdmund S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62, 659–661.
63.
PollockTimothy G.RindovaViolina P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 631–642.
64.
RindovaViolina P.FombrunCharles J. (1999). Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 691–710.
65.
RouletThomas J. (2019). Sins for some, virtues for others: Media coverage of investment banks’ misconduct and adherence to professional norms during the financial crisis. Human Relations, 72, 1436–1463.
66.
ShinShung J.KimTae-YeolLeeJeong-YeonBianLin (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 197–212.
67.
SinhaParesha N.InksonKerrBarkerJames R. (2012). Committed to a failing strategy: Celebrity CEO, intermediaries, media and stakeholders in a co-created drama. Organization Studies, 33, 223–245.
68.
StoutLynn A. (2012). New thinking on “shareholder primacy.”Accounting, Economics and Law, 2(2).
69.
TolbertPamela S. (1986). Organizations and inequality: Sources of earnings differences between male and female faculty. Sociology of Education, 59, 227–236.
70.
TolbertPamela S.CastillaEmilio J. (2017). Editorial essay: Introduction to a special issue on inequality in the workplace (“what works?”). Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 70, 3–15.
71.
TosiHenry L.Gomez-MejiaLuis R. (1989). The decoupling of CEO pay and performance: An agency theory perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 169–189.
72.
WassermanVardaFrenkelMichal (2015). Spatial work in between glass ceilings and glass walls: Gender-class intersectionality and organizational aesthetics. Organization Studies, 36, 1485–1505.
WestphalJames D.GraebnerMelissa E. (2010). A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 15–43.
75.
WestphalJames D.ZajacEdward J. (1995). Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 60–83.
76.
WiersemaMargarethe F.ZhangYan (2011). CEO dismissal: The role of investment analysts. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1161–1182.
77.
WooldridgeJeffrey M. (2011). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
78.
YuFang (2008). Analyst coverage and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 245–271.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
