The field of management and organization studies (MOS) regularly invokes the relational theories of Karen Barad in sociomaterial and new materialist scholarship. Taking the increasing influence of this work as our point of departure, we witness once again the deferral of difference as organizational scholars grapple with Barad’s oeuvre but gloss the work’s feminist, queer, and decolonial impetus. As a consequence, relational scholarship in MOS circulates without its commentary on gender, race, sexuality, and related axes of inequity. This article recenters these aspects of relational approaches in three steps: (1) identifying the scholarly practices through which they disappear, (2) “re-relationalizing” relational theory in its radical roots, and (3) envisioning scholarly practices that better actualize the potential of relational theories. Our goal is to cultivate the constitutive relations of MOS such that we cease the deferral of difference, both in the study of power and in studies of “generic” organizational practice.
AckerJoan (2000). Revisiting class: Thinking from gender, race, and organizations. Social Politics, 7, 192–214.
2.
AhmedSara (2008). Open forum imaginary prohibitions: Some preliminary remarks on the founding gestures of the ‘new materialism’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15, 23–39.
3.
AhmedSara (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
AnzaldúaGloria (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
5.
AshcraftKaren L. (2013). The glass slipper: ‘Incorporating’ occupational identity in management studies. Academy of Management Review, 38, 6–31.
6.
AshcraftKaren L. (2016). Fringe benefits: Revisi(ti)ng the fate of feminisms in critical management studies. In PrasadAnshumanPrasadPushkalaMillsAlbert J.MillsJean Helms (Eds.), The Routledge companion to critical management studies (pp. 93–106). New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
AshcraftKaren L. (2017). ‘Submission’ to the rule of excellence: Ordinary affect and precarious resistance in the labor of organization and management studies. Organization, 24, 36–58.
8.
AshcraftKaren L. (2018). Critical complicity: The feel of difference at work in home and field. Management Learning, 49, 613–623.
9.
AshcraftKaren L.FloresLisa A. (2003). ‘Slaves with white collars’: Decoding a contemporary crisis of masculinity. Text and Performance Quarterly, 23, 1–29.
10.
AshcraftKaren L.MuhrSara L. (2018). Coding military command as a promiscuous practice? Unsettling the gender binaries of leadership. Human Relations, 71, 206–228.
11.
BaradKaren (1998). Agential realism: Feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In BiagioliMario (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
BaradKaren (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
BaradKaren (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together apart. Parallax, 20, 168–187.
15.
BargetzBrigitteSanosSandrine (2020). Feminist matters, critique and the future of the political. Feminist Theory, 21, 501–516.
16.
BennettJane (2005). The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout. Public Culture, 17, 445–465.
17.
BennettJane (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18.
ButlerJudith (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
CarringtonAndré (2017). Mike Brown’s body: New materialism and Black form. ASAP/Journal, 2, 276–283.
20.
ChakravarrtyPaulaKuoRachelGrubbsVictoriaMcIlwainCharlton (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68, 254–266.
21.
CookeBill (2003). The denial of slavery in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1895–1918.
22.
FordJackieHardingNancy H.GilmoreSarahRichardsonSue (2017). Becoming the leader: Leadership as material presence. Organization Studies, 38, 1553–1571.
23.
FotakiMariannaMetcalfeBeverly D.HardingNancy (2014). Writing materiality into organization studies through and with Luce Irigaray. Human Relations, 67, 1239–1263.
24.
FussDiana (1989). Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature, and difference. New York, NY: Routledge.
GherardiSilvia (2016). To start practice theorizing anew: The contribution of the concepts agencement and formativeness. Organization, 23, 680–698.
29.
GrimesDiane S.ParkerPatricia S. (2009). Imagining organizational communication as a decolonizing project: In conversation with Broadfoot, Munshi, Mumby, and Stohl. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 502–511.
30.
GroszElizabeth (2010). The untimeliness of feminist theory. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18, 48–51.
HarawayDonna (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
35.
HardingNancyGilmoreSarahFordJackie (2022). Matter that embodies: Agentive flesh and working bodies/selves. Organization Studies, 43, 649–668.
36.
HardingSandra (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
HarrisKate L. (2016). Feminist dilemmatic theorizing: New materialism in communication studies. Communication Theory, 26, 103–211.
38.
HarrisKate L. (2017). Re-situating organizational knowledge: Violence, intersectionality, and the privilege of partial perspective. Human Relations, 70, 263–285.
39.
HarrisKate L. (2019). Beyond the rapist: Title IX and sexual violence on US campuses. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
HarrisKate L. (in press). A feminist new materialist take on post-qualitative research. In BrummansBoris H. J. M.TaylorBryan C.SivunenAnu (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in organizational communication. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
41.
HarrisKate L.FortneyJames M. (2017). Reflexive caring: Rethinking reflexivity through trauma and disability. Text and Performance Quarterly, 37, 20–34.
42.
HarrisKate L.McFarlaneMeganWieskampValerie N. (2020). The promise and peril of agency as motion: A feminist new materialist approach to sexual violence and sexual harassment. Organization, 27, 660–679.
43.
HemmingsClare (2005). Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies, 19, 548–567.
44.
HoskingDian M. (2011). Telling tales of relations: Appreciating relational constructionism. Organization Studies, 32, 47–65.
45.
IedemaRick (2007). On the multi-modality, materiality and contingency of organization discourse. Organization Studies, 28, 931–946.
46.
IrniSari (2013). The politics of materiality: Affective encounters in a transdisciplinary debate. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20, 347–360.
47.
JacksonZakiyyah I. (2015). Outer worlds: The persistence of race in movement ‘beyond the human’. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21, 215–218.
48.
JacksonZakiyyah I. (2018). ‘Theorizing in a void’: Sublimity, matter, and physics in Black feminist poetics. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 117, 617–648.
49.
JørgensenKenneth M.StrandAnete M. C.BojeDavid (2013). Towards a postcolonial-storytelling theory of management and organization. Philosophy of Management, 12, 43–66.
50.
JuelskjærMalouPlauborgHelleAdrianStine W. (Eds.) (2021). Dialogues on agential realism: Engaging in worldings through research practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
LeonardiPaul M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23, 59–76.
52.
LiuHelena (2019). An embarrassment of riches: The seduction of postfeminism in the academy. Organization, 26, 20–37.
53.
LópezAlfred J. (2018). Contesting the material turn; or, The persistence of agency. Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 5, 371–386.
MuñozJosé E.HaritawornJinthanaHirdMyraJacksonZakiyyah I.PuarJasbir K.JoyEileen, et al. (2015). Theorizing queer inhumanisms. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21, 209–248.
56.
NgaiSianne (2005). Ugly feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
NkomoStella M. (2011). A postcolonial and anti-colonial reading of ‘African’ leadership and management in organization studies: Tensions, contradictions and possibilities. Organization, 18, 365–386.
58.
NybergDaniel (2009). Computers, customer service operatives and cyborgs: Intra-actions in call centres. Organization, 30, 1181–1199.
59.
ObornEivorBarrettMichaelDawsonSandra (2013). Distributed leadership in policy formulation: A sociomaterial perspective. Organization Studies, 34, 253–276.
60.
OrlikowskiWanda J.ScottSusan V. (2015). Exploring material-discursive practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 697–705.
61.
PullenAlisonHardingNancyPhillipsMary (2017). Feminists and queer theorists debate the future of critical management studies. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
62.
RossiterMargaret W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science, 23, 325–341.
63.
SandovalChela (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
64.
SchaefferFelicity A. (2018). Spirit matters: Gloria Anzaldúa’s cosmic becoming across human/nonhuman borderlands. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43, 1005–1029.
65.
ScottSusanOrlikowskiWanda J. (2013). Sociomateriality—taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch. Information and Organization, 23, 77–80.
66.
SeshadriKalpana R. (2012). HumAnimal: Race, law, language. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
SullivanNikki (2012). The somatechnics of perception and the matter of the non/human: A critical response to the new materialism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19, 299–313.
69.
TaylorCarol A. (2016). Close encounters of a critical kind: A diffractive musing in/between new material feminism and object-oriented ontology. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 201–212.
70.
ThienDeborah (2005). After or beyond feeling? A consideration of affect and emotion in geography. Area, 37, 450–456.
71.
ToddZoe (2016). An indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: “Ontology” is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29, 4–22.
72.
TownsArmond R. (2018). Black “matter” lives. Women’s Studies in Communication, 41, 349–358.
van AmsterdamNoortjevan EckDideKjærKatrine Meldgaard (2023). On (not) fitting in: Fat embodiment, affect and organizational materials as differentiating agents. Organization Studies, 44, 593–612.
75.
van der TuinIris (2011). “A different starting point, a different metaphysics”: Reading Bergson and Barad diffractively. Hypatia, 26, 22–42.
76.
van der TuinIris (2014). Diffraction as a methodology for feminist onto-epistemology: On encountering Chantal Chawaf and posthuman interpellation. Parallax, 23, 231–244.
77.
WattsVanessa (2013). Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 2, 23–34.
78.
WhitemanGailCooperWilliam H. (2011). Ecological sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 889–911.
79.
WilsonElizabeth A. (2015). Gut feminism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
80.
Wolfram CoxJulieHassardJohn (2005). Triangulation in organizational research: A re-presentation. Organization, 12, 109–133.
81.
WurthKiene B. (2014). Diffraction, handwriting, and intra-mediality in Louise Paille’sLivres-livres. Parallax, 20, 258–273.
