The challenge of dealing with paradoxes has become a central issue in management and organization studies. Present research literature is largely inclined to idealize paradoxical framing in thinking and theorizing. We critically explore the perils paradoxes present when generated by stretch goals whose ‘achievement’ is accomplished through impression management. Using the Volkswagen emissions scandal we show how paradoxical promises, embraced discursively but not substantively, created false transcendence rather than paradoxical mastery. We contribute to paradox theory by discussing how the illusion of paradox embrace can trigger dysfunctional behaviours. In practice, the paper cautions organizations and their members from being overconfident in their ability to embrace paradoxes successfully.
AbdallahC.DenisJ. L.LangleyA. (2011). Having your cake and eating it too: Discourses of transcendence and their role in organizational change dynamics. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 333–348.
2.
AndriopoulosC.GotsiM. (2017). Methods of paradox. In SmithW.LewisM.JarzabkowskiP.LangleyA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 513–528). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AndriopoulosC.LewisM. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning, 43, 104–122.
4.
AshforthB. E.RogersK. M.PrattM. G.PradiesC. (2014). Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science, 1453–1478.
5.
BansalP.CorleyK. (2011). The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management, 54, 233–237.
6.
BednarekR.ParoutisS.SillinceJ. (2017). Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organization Studies, 38, 77–101.
7.
BolinoM. C.KacmarK. M.TurnleyW. H.GilstrapJ. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 1080–1109.
8.
BostonW. (2015). Volkswagen crisis grows: Stock tumbles as European Union vows to look into the car maker’s test practices. Wall Street Journal (Europe edition).
9.
BoxenbaumE.JonssonS. (2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.SahlinK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 79–104). London: SAGE Publications.
10.
BrennanN. M.ConroyJ. P. (2013). Executive hubris: The case of a bank CEO. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26, 172–195.
11.
CameronK. S.QuinnR. E. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12.
ClaxtonG.OwenD.Sadler-SmithE. (2015). Hubris in leadership: A peril of unbridled intuition?Leadership, 11, 57–78.
CrêteR. (2016). The Volkswagen scandal from the viewpoint of corporate governance. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7, 25–31.
15.
CunhaM. P.GiustinianoL.RegoA.CleggS. (2017). Mission impossible? The paradoxes of stretch goal setting. Management Learning, 48(2), 40–57.
16.
CunhaM. P.PutnamL. L. (2019). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17, 95–106.
17.
DelmasM. A.BurbanoV. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54, 64–87.
18.
DrummondH. (1998). Is escalation always irrational?Organization Studies, 19, 911–929.
19.
EdmondsonA. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.
20.
EdmondsonA. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
21.
EisenhardtK. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
EwingJ. (2016). Suspended developer at Porsche will resign. New York Times.
25.
EwingJ. (2017). Faster, higher, farther: The inside story of the Volkswagen scandal. London: Random House.
26.
FairhurstG. T.SmithW. K.BanghartS. G.LewisM. W.PutnamL. L.RaischS.SchadJ. (2016). Diverging and converging: Integrative insights on a paradox meta-perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 173–182.
27.
FarjounM. (2017). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes. In LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of process organization studies (pp. 87–109). London: SAGE Publications.
28.
FeltonR. (2015). Volkswagen faces potential class-action lawsuits over emissions scandal. The Guardian.
29.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
30.
GaimM. (2017). Paradox as the New Normal: Essays on framing, managing and sustaining organizational tensions (PhD thesis). Umeå University, Sweden.
31.
GaimM. (2018). On the emergence and management of paradoxical tensions: The case of architectural firms. European Management Journal, 36, 497–518.
32.
GaimM.WåhlinN.CunhaM. P.CleggS. (2018). Analyzing competing demands in organizations: A systematic comparison. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1–16.
33.
GhoseT. (2015, September24(updated)). Volkswagen Scandal: Why is it so hard to make clean diesel cars?Live Science.
GilbertF.MichaudV.BenteinK.DuboisC.-A.BédardJ.-L. (2018). Unpacking the dynamics of paradoxes across levels: Cascading tensions and struggling professionals. In FarjounM.SmithW.LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), Dualities, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizational life (pp. 56–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31.
38.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
39.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. New York: Doubleday.
40.
HahnT.FiggeF.PinkseJ.PreussL. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(148), 235–248.
HengstI.-A.JarzabkowskiP.HoeglM.MuethelM. (in press). Toward a process theory of making sustainability strategies legitimate in action. Academy of Management Journal.
43.
HerselM.HelmuthC.ZornM.ShropshireC.RidgeJ. (in press). The corrective actions organizations pursue following misconduct: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals.
44.
HirschP. M.MilnerD. (2016). When scandals yield ‘it’s about time!’ Rather than ‘We’re shocked and surprised!’Journal of Management Inquiry, 25, 447–449.
JarzabkowskiP.BednarekR.ChalkiasK.CacciatoriE. (2019). Exploring inter-organizational paradoxes: Methodological lessons from a study of a grand challenge. Strategic Organization, 17, 120–132.
47.
JarzabkowskiP.LêJ. K.Van de VenA. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11, 245–280.
KrallJ.PengR. (2015). The difficulty of calculating deaths caused by the Volkswagen scandal. The Guardian.
50.
LauferW. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253–261.
51.
LockeK.Golden-BiddleK.FeldmanM. S. (2008). Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19, 907–918.
MacLeanT. L.BehnamM. (2010). The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1499–1520.
54.
Matthias Müller (2015). ‘We will overcome this crisis’. [Press release]
55.
MerleR. (2016). Lawsuits widen VW emissions scandal. Washington Post.
56.
Miron-SpektorE.GinoF.ArgoteL. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 229–240.
57.
Miron-SpektorE.IngramA.KellerJ.SmithW.LewisM. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 26–45.
58.
MohamedA. A.GardnerW. L.PaolilloJ. G. (1999). A taxonomy of organizational impression management tactics. Journal of Competitiveness Studies, 7, 108–129.
59.
O’ReillyC. A.TushmanM. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(4), 185–206.
60.
OrdóñezL. D.SchweitzerM. E.GalinskyA. D.BazermanM. H. (2009). Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 6–16.
61.
PetitV.BollaertH. (2012). Flying too close to the sun? Hubris among CEOs and how to prevent it. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 265–283.
62.
PutnamL. L.FairhurstG. T.BanghartS. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 65–171.
63.
RaischS.HargraveT. J.Van de VenA. H. (2018). The learning spiral: A process perspective on paradox. Journal of Management Studies, 55, 1507–1526.
64.
RoganA.PatonG. (2017). Emissions ‘fix’ ruined our cars, say VW drivers. The Times.
RusheD. (2015). VW software scandal: Chief apologises for breaking public trust. The Guardian.
67.
SchadJ.BansalP. (2018). Seeing the forest and the trees: How a systems perspective informs paradox research. Journal of Management Studies, 55, 1491–1506.
68.
SchadJ.LewisM.RaischS.SmithW. (2016). Paradoxical research in management science: Looking backward to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 5–64.
69.
SchadJ.LewisM. W.SmithW. K. (2019). Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory development. Strategic Organization, 17(7), 107–119.
70.
SheepM. L.FairhurstG. T.KhazanchiS. (2017). Knots in the discourse of innovation: Investigating multiple tensions in a reacquired spin-off. Organization Studies, 38, 463–488.
71.
SitkinS. B.SeeK. E.MillerC. C.LawlessM. W.CartonA. M. (2011). The paradox of stretch goals: Organizations in pursuit of the seemingly impossible. Academy of Management Review, 36, 544–566.
72.
SmithW. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1592–1623.
73.
SmithW.ErezM.JarvenpaaS.LewisM. W.TraceyP. (2017). Adding complexity to theories of paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change: Introduction to Organization Studies Special Issue on paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change. Organization Studies, 38, 303–317.
74.
SmithW.LewisM. (2011). Towards a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.
75.
SmithW.LewisM.TushmanM. (2016). Both/And leadership. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 62–70.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
78.
TakeuchiH.OsonoE.ShimizuN. (2008). The contradictions that drive Toyota’s success. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 96–104.
79.
ThompsonK. R.HochwarterW. A.MathysN. J. (1997). Stretch targets: What makes them effective?Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 48–60.
80.
VG-AG. (2008). 2007 Annual Report. Retrieved from Wolfsburg:
81.
ViswanathaA.RogersC. (2016). VW Engineer pleads guilty in emissions-cheating scandal; James Liang enters plea in Detroit federal court to conspiracy, agrees to cooperate in further investigations. Wall Street Journal Online.
82.
Volkswagen Congress Hearing: Emissions scandal (2015).
83.
Volkswagen reaches settlements with US government (2017). [Press release]
ZhuY.ChenZ.LiuJ. (2014). Emission, efficiency, and influence in a diesel n-butanol dual-injection engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 87, 385–391.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
