Markets are the outcomes of political and institutional struggles where policy support plays a major role, but research to date falls short in explaining how the breadth of available interventions can have contradictory effects on the process of market formation. This article explores the consequences of policy support in the context of the nascent social investment market in the United Kingdom, between 2000 and 2015, when the government was a key actor in building the market infrastructure. I track the effects of a portfolio of policy interventions, including new regulation, direct investment and convening efforts. I show that, while policy support stimulated the market by driving supply and intermediation, it also led to an increase in contestation from the social sector. I link those intended and unintended consequences to the top-down features of the policy support (supporting the dominant logic, reinforcing hierarchical relations and optimistic rhetoric), hence showing when and how policy support can become a double-edged sword. The article contributes to the literature on policy support in market formation by showing the mechanisms through which top-down policy interventions can have important unintended consequences, especially when shaping the boundaries and features of markets that emerge at the intersection of financial and social sectors.
AddisRosemary (2016). The roles of government and policy in social finance. In NichollsAlexPatonRobEmersonJed (Eds.), Social Finance (pp. 383–459). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
AldrichHoward E.FiolC. Marlene (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.
4.
AmisJohn M.MairJohannaMunirKamal (2019). The organizational reproduction of inequality. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 195–230.
5.
AnandNarasimhanPetersonRichard A. (2000). When market information constitutes fields: Sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry. Organization Science, 11, 270–284.
6.
ArjalièsDiane-Laure (2010). A social movement perspective on finance : How socially responsible investment mattered. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 57–78.
7.
ArjalièsDiane-LaureBansalPratima (Tima) (2018). Beyond numbers: How investment managers accommodate societal issues in financial decisions. Organization Studies, 39, 691–719.
8.
ArjalièsDiane-LaureDurandRodolphe (2019). Product categories as judgment devices: The moral awakening of the investment industry. Organization Science, 30, 885–911.
9.
BerronePascualGelabertLilianaMassa-SaluzzoFedericaRousseauHoracio E. (2016). Understanding community dynamics in the study of grand challenges: How nonprofits, institutional actors, and the community fabric interact to influence income inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1940–1964.
10.
BeunzaDanielFerraroFabrizio (2019). Performative work: Bridging performativity and institutional theory in the responsible investment field. Organization Studies, 40, 515–543.
BSC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2012. (2013).
13.
CameronDavid (2010). Speech on the Big Society.
14.
CarruthersBruce G.KimJeong-Chul (2011). The sociology of finance. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 239–259.
15.
CasasnovasGuillermoChliovaMyrto (2020). Legitimacy trade-offs in hybrid fields: An illustration through microfinance, impact investing and social entrepreneurship. In BesharovMarya L.MitzinneckBjoern C. (Eds.), Organizational hybridity: Perspectives, processes, promises (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 69) (pp. 291–312). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
16.
CasasnovasGuillermoFerraroFabrizio (2022). Speciation in nascent markets: Collective learning through cultural and material scaffolding. Organization Studies, 43, 829–860.
17.
CasasnovasGuillermoVentrescaMarc J. (2016). Formative dynamics in the UK social investment market, 2000–2015: An ‘organization rich’ agenda on how markets form. In LehnerOthmar M. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of social and sustainable finance (pp. 693–709). New York: Routledge.
18.
CharmazKathy C. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (1 edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
19.
Commission on Unclaimed Assets. (2006). A Social Investment Bank: Consultation Paper (Issue July).
20.
DaggersJessFloydDavidGregoryDan (2021). A snapshot of the UK social investment market, 2000–2021 (September issuse).
21.
DaviesRhodri (2016). Public good by private means. Birmingham: Alliance Publishing Trust.
22.
DavisGerald F.KimSuntae (2015). Financialization of the economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 203–221.
23.
DavisonRobbie (2013). Does social finance understand social need? (January issue).
24.
DobbinFrankDowdTimothy J. (1997). How policy shapes competition: Early railroad foundings in Massachusetts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 501–529.
DurandRodolpheGranqvistNinaTyllströmAnna (2017). From categories to categorization: A Social perspective on market categorization. In DurandRodolpheGranqvistNinaTyllströmAnna (Eds.), From categories to categorization: Studies in sociology, organizations and strategy at the crossroads (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 51) (pp. 3–30). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
27.
EspelandWendy N.SauderMichael (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1–40.
FurnariSanti (2016). Institutional fields as linked arenas: Inter-field resource dependence, institutional work and institutional change. Human Relations, 69, 551–580.
33.
FurnariSanti (2017). When does an issue trigger change in a field? A comparative approach to issue frames, field structures and types of field change. Human Relations, 71, 321–348.
34.
GamsonWilliam A.MeyerDavid S. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In McAdamDougMcCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N. (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 275–290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
GeorgallisPanayiotis (Panikos)DowellGlenDurandRodolphe (2018). Shine on me: Industry coherence and policy support for emerging industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 503–541.
36.
GeorgallisPanayiotis (Panikos)DurandRodolphe (2017). Achieving high growth in policy-dependent industries: Differences between startups and corporate-backed ventures. Long Range Planning, 50, 487–500.
37.
GeorgallisPanayiotis (Panikos)LeeBrandon (2020). Toward a theory of entry in moral markets: The role of social movements and organizational identity. Strategic Organization, 18, 50–74.
38.
GiamporcaroStéphanieGondJean-Pascal (2016). Calculability as politics in the construction of markets: The case of socially responsible investment in France. Organization Studies, 37, 465–495.
39.
GiamporcaroStéphanieGondJean-PascalO’SullivanNiamh (2020). Orchestrating governmental corporate social responsibility interventions through financial markets: The case of French socially responsible investment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30, 288–334.
40.
GioiaDennis A.NagRajivCorleyKevin G. (2012). Visionary ambiguity and strategic change. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 364–375.
41.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Aldine Publishing.
42.
GondJean-PascalKangNaheeMoonJeremy (2011). The government of self-regulation: On the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society, 40, 640–671.
43.
GondJean-PascalPianiValeria (2012). Enabling institutional investors’ collective action: The role of the Principles for Responsible Investment Initiative. Business & Society, 52, 64–104.
44.
GranqvistNinaGrodalStineWoolleyJennifer L. (2013). Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organization Science, 24, 395–413.
GrodalStine (2018). Field expansion and contraction: How communities shape social and symbolic boundaries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63, 783–818.
47.
GrodalStineGotsopoulosAleksiosSuarezFernando F. (2015). The coevolution of technologies and categories during industry emergence. Academy of Management Review, 40, 423–445.
48.
GrodalStineO’MahonySiobhán (2017). How does a Grand Challenge become displaced? Explaining the duality of field mobilization. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1801–1827.
49.
Growing the Social Investment Market: A Vision and a Strategy. (2011).
50.
Growing the Social Investment Market: Landscape and Economic Impact. (2013). City of London.
51.
HanniganTimothy R.CasasnovasGuillermo (2020). New structuralism and field emergence: The co-constitution of meanings and actors in the early moments of social impact investing. In SteeleChristopher W. J.HanniganTimothy R.GlaserVernToubianaMadelineGehmanJoel (Eds.), Macrofoundations: Exploring the institutionally situated nature of activity (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 68) (pp. 147–183). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
52.
HehenbergerLisaMairJohannaMetzAshley (2019). The assembly of a field ideology: An idea-centric perspective on systemic power in impact investing. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 1672–1704.
53.
HiattShon R.SineWesley D.TolbertPamela S. (2009). From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 635–667.
54.
HöchstädterAnnaScheckBarbara (2015). What’s in a name: An analysis of impact investing understandings by academics and practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 449–475.
55.
KennedyJay (2009). DSC response to the Social Investment Wholesale Bank consultation.
56.
KourulaArnoMoonJeremySalles-DjelicMarie-LaureWickertChristopher (2019). New roles of government in the governance of business conduct: Implications for management and organizational research. Organization Studies, 40, 1101–1123.
57.
LangleyAnne (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
58.
LeeBrandon H.HiattShon R.LounsburyMichael (2017). Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organization Science, 28, 447–470.
59.
LeeBrandon H.StrubenJeroenBinghamChristopher B. (2018). Collective action and market formation: An integrative framework. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 242–266.
60.
LeibelEstherHallettTimBechkyBeth (2017). Meaning at the source: The dynamics of field formation in institutional research. Academy of Management Annals, 12, 154–177.
61.
LitricoJean-BaptisteDavidRobert J. (2017). The evolution of issue interpretation within organizational fields: Actor positions, framing trajectories, and field settlement. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 986–1015.
62.
LounsburyMichaelVentrescaMarc J.HirschPaul M. (2003). Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 71–104.
63.
LyonFergusBaldockRobert (2014). Financing social ventures and the demand for social investment. In Third Sector Research Centre.
64.
MairJohannaHehenbergerLisa (2014). Front-stage and backstage convening: The transition from opposition to mutualistic coexistence in organizational philanthropy. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1174–1200.
65.
MairJohannaMartíIgnasiVentrescaMarc J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 819–850.
66.
MazzucatoMariana (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. London: Anthem.
67.
McHughNeilSinclairStephenRoyMichaelHuckfieldLeslieDonaldsonCam (2013). Social impact bonds: A wolf in sheep’s clothing?Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21, 247–257.
68.
MilesMatthew B.HubermanA. Michael (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
69.
MorganGlenn (2008). Market formation and governance in international financial markets: The case of OTC derivatives. Human Relations, 61, 637–660.
NichollsAlex (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1, 70–100.
72.
NichollsAlexTeasdaleSimon (2017). Neoliberalism by stealth? Exploring continuity and change within the UK social enterprise policy paradigm. Policy & Politics, 45, 323–341.
73.
OsborneDavidGaeblerTed (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
74.
OzcanPinarSantosFilipe M. (2015). The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1486–1512.
75.
PachecoDesirée F.YorkJeffrey G.HargraveTimothy J. (2014). The coevolution of industries, social movements, and institutions: Wind power in the United States. Organization Science, 25, 1609–1632.
76.
RosaJosé AntonioPoracJoe F.Runser-SpanjolJelenaSaxonMichael S. (1999). Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. Journal of Marketing, 63, 64–77.
77.
RussoMichael V. (2001). Institutions, exchange relations, and the emergence of new fields: Regulatory policies and independent power production in America, 1978–1992. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 57–86.
78.
SantosFilipe M.EisenhardtKathleen M. (2009). Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 643–671.
79.
SchneibergMarcSouleSarah A. (2005). Institutionalization as a contested, multilevel process. In DavisGerald F.McAdamDougRichard ScottW.ZaldMayer N. (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 122–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
SchneiderAnselmSchererAndreas G. (2019). State governance beyond the ‘shadow of hierarchy’: A social mechanisms perspective on governmental CSR policies. Organization Studies, 40, 1147–1168.
81.
SchwartzRodneyJonesClareNichollsAlex (2016). Building the social finance infrastructure. In NichollsAlexPatonRobEmersonJed (Eds.), Social finance (pp. 488–517). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82.
SepulvedaLeandro (2015). Social enterprise: A new phenomenon in the field of economic and social welfare?Social Policy & Administration, 49, 842–861.
83.
SgourevStoyan V. (2013). How Paris gave rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and fragmentation in radical innovation. Organization Science, 24, 1601–1617.
84.
SinclairStephenMcHughNeilHuckfieldLeslieRoyMichaelDonaldsonCam (2014). Social impact bonds: Shifting the boundaries of citizenship. Social Policy Review, 26, 119–136.
85.
SineWesley D.DavidRobert J. (2003). Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Research Policy, 32, 185–207.
86.
SineWesley D.HavemanHeather A.TolbertPamela S. (2005). Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 200–232.
87.
SineWesley D.LeeBrandon H. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 123–155.
88.
SkocpolTheda (1985). Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. In EvansPeter B.RueschemeyerDietrichSkocpolTheda (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89.
SlagerReinekeGondJean-PascalMoonJeremy (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, 33, 763–790.
90.
Social Investment Task Force. (2000). Enterprising communities: Wealth beyond welfare.
91.
SuarezFernando F.GrodalStineGotsopoulosAleksios (2015). Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 437–448.
SwaminathanAnand (1995). The proliferation of specialist organizations in the American wine industry, 1941–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 653–680.
94.
The Size and Composition of Social Investment in the UK (Social Investment Insight Series). (2016). Big Society Capital.
Van de VenAndrew H.GarudRaghu (1993). Innovation and industry development: The case of cochlear implants. In RosenbloomRichard S.BurgelmanRobert A. (Eds.), Research on technological innovation, management and policy (Vol. 5, pp. 1–46). Stamford, CA: JAI Press.
97.
van WijkJakomijnStamWouterElfringTomZietsmaCharleneden HondFrank (2013). Activists and incumbents structuring change: The interplay of agency, culture, and networks in field evolution. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 358–386.
98.
VentrescaMarc J.MohrJohn W. (2002). Archival research methods. In BaumJoel A. C. (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 805–828). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
99.
VermeulenPatrickAnsariShazLounsburyMichael (2016). Understanding ‘failed’ markets: Conflicting logics and dissonance in attempts to price the priceless child. In GehmanJoelLounsburyMichaelGreenwoodRoyston (Eds.), How institutions matter! (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 48B) (pp. 37–68). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
100.
WeberKlausHeinzeKathryn L.DeSouceyMichaela (2008). Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 529–567.
101.
YanShipengAlmandozJuanFerraroFabrizio (2021). The impact of logic (in)compatibility: Green investing, state policy, and corporate environmental performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66, 903–944.
102.
YanShipengFerraroFabrizio (2016). State mediation in market emergence: Socially responsible investing in China. In GehmanJoelLounsburyMichaelRoyston (Eds.), How institutions matter! (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 48B) (pp. 173–206). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
103.
YanShipengFerraroFabrizioAlmandozJuan (2018). The rise of socially responsible investment funds: The paradoxical role of the financial logic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 466–501.
104.
YorkJeffrey G.VedulaSiddharthLenoxMichael J. (2018). It’s not easy building green: The impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 1492–1523.
105.
ZietsmaCharleneGroenewegenPeterLogueDanielleHiningsC. R. (Bob) (2017). Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 391–450.
