The construction of market infrastructure is a key component of market formation. In this article, we explore when and how this process leads to the fragmentation of a nascent market. We study the emergence of new markets in the context of social and impact investing in the United Kingdom during the period 1999 to 2019. We identify a recursive process of building the cultural and material infrastructure of the market, which we label cultural and material scaffolding, that drives collective learning by envisioning alternative futures and conducting institutional trials. We show how this scaffolding process explains the split between the social investment and the impact investment markets, which we theorize as market speciation. We identify two scope conditions under which we expect speciation to occur: field overlap and material anchoring. The paper contributes to the literature on market formation, and to the empirical understanding of how social and impact investment have emerged.
AnsellChristopher (2011). Pragmatist democracy: Evolutionary learning as public philosophy. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
AugustineGraceSoderstromSarahMilnerDanielWeberKlaus (2019). Constructing a distant future: Imaginaries in geoengineering. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 1930–1960.
5.
BeckertJens (1996). What is sociological about economic sociology? Uncertainty and the embeddedness of economic action. Theory and Society, 25, 803–840.
6.
BeckertJens (2009). The social order of markets. Theory and Society, 38, 245–269.
7.
BeckertJens (2010). How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks, and cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31, 605–627.
8.
BeckertJens (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Big Society Capital. (2016). The size and composition of social investment in the UK (Social Investment Insight Series).
BothelloJoelSalles-DjelicMarie-Laure (2018). Evolving conceptualizations of organizational environmentalism: A path generation account. Organization Studies, 39, 93–119.
13.
CasasnovasGuillermoChliovaMyrto (2020). Legitimacy trade-offs in hybrid fields: An illustration through microfinance, impact investing and social entrepreneurship. In BesharovMarya L.MitzinneckBjorn C. (Eds.), Organizational hybridity: Perspectives, processes, promises (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 69, pp. 291–312). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
14.
ChliovaMyrtoMairJohannaVernisAlfred (2020). Persistent category ambiguity: The case of social entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 41, 1019–1042.
15.
CohenMichael, D.MarchJames, G.OlsenJohan, P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.
16.
CohenRonald (2018). On impact: A guide to the impact revolution. London, UK.
17.
CornelissenJoep, P.WernerMirjam, D. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 181–235.
18.
DaggersJessNichollsAlex (2016). The landscape of social impact investment research: Trends and opportunities.
19.
DavisonRobbie (2013). Does social finance understand social need?
20.
DeJordyRichScullyMaureenVentrescaMarc J.CreedW. E. Douglas (2020). Inhabited ecosystems: propelling transformative social change between and through organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65, 931–971.
21.
DeweyJohn (1938). The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
22.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
23.
DjelicMarie-LaureQuackSigrid (2007). Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems. Theory and Society, 36, 161–186.
24.
EtzionDrorFerraroFabrizio (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21, 1092–1107.
25.
FarjounMosheAnsellChrisBoinArjen (2015). Pragmatism in organization studies: Meeting the challenges of a dynamic and complex world. Organization Science, 26, 1787–1804.
FloydDavid (2018). What a relief! A review of social investment tax relief for charities and social enterprises.
28.
FriedlandRogerAlfordRobert R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In PowellW. W.DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
FurnariSanti (2014). Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 39, 439–462.
30.
GarudRaghuKarnøePeter (2001). Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In GarudRaghuKarnøePeter (Eds.), Path dependence and creation (pp. 1–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
GeorgallisPanayiotis (Panikos)LeeBrandon (2020). Toward a theory of entry in moral markets: The role of social movements and organizational identity. Strategic Organization, 18, 50–74.
32.
GioiaDennis A.NagRajivCorleyKevin G. (2012). Visionary ambiguity and strategic change. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 364–375.
33.
GrayBarbaraPurdyJill M.AnsariShahzad (Shaz). (2015). From interactions to institutions: Microprocesses of framing and mechanisms for the structuring of institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 40, 115–143.
34.
GregoryNeilVolkAriane (2020). Growing impact: New insights into the practice of impact investing.
35.
GrodalStineGotsopoulosAleksiosSuarezFernando F. (2015). The coevolution of technologies and categories during industry emergence. Academy of Management Review, 40, 423–445.
36.
GrodalStineO’MahonySiobhàn (2017). How does a grand challenge become displaced? Explaining the duality of field mobilization. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1801–1827.
37.
HanniganTimothy R.CasasnovasGuillermo (2020). New structuralism and field emergence: The co-constitution of meanings and actors in the early moments of social impact investing. In SteeleChristopher W. J.HanniganTimothy R.GlaserVernToubianaMadelineGehmanJoel (Eds.), Macrofoundations: Exploring the institutionally situated nature of activity (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 68, pp. 147–183). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
38.
HarjiKarimJacksonEdward T. (2012). Accelerating impact achievements, challenges and what’s next in building the impact investing industry.
39.
HedbergLeanne M.LounsburyMichael (2020). Not just small potatoes: Cultural entrepreneurship in the moralizing of markets. Organization Science, orsc.2020.1395.
40.
HehenbergerLisaMairJohannaMetzAshley (2019). The assembly of a field ideology: An idea-centric perspective on systemic power in impact investing. Academy of Management Journal.
41.
HiningsC. R. (Bob)LogueDanielleZietsmaCharlene (2017). Fields, governance and institutional infrastructure. In GreenwoodRoystonLawrenceThomas B.MeyerRenate E.OliverChristine (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd edition, pp. 163–189). London: SAGE Publications.
42.
HöchstädterAnna K.ScheckBarbara (2015). What’s in a name: An analysis of impact Investing understandings by academics and practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 449–475.
Investing for Impact. (2019). European Venture Philanthropy Association.
45.
KentDerinDacinM. Tina (2013). Bankers at the gate: Microfinance and the high cost of borrowed logics. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 759–773.
46.
LangleyAnn (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
47.
LangleyAnnSmallmanCliveTsoukasHaridimosVan de VenAndrew H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1–13.
48.
LangleyAnnTruaxJean (1994). A process study of new technology adoption in smaller manufacturing firms. Journal of Management Studies, 31, 619–652.
49.
LeeBrandon H.HiattShon R.LounsburyMichael (2017). Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organization Science, 28, 447–470.
50.
LeeBrandon H.StrubenJeroenBinghamChristopher B. (2018). Collective action and market formation: An integrative framework. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 242–266.
51.
LeibelEstherHallettTimBechkyBeth (2017). Meaning at the source: The dynamics of field formation in institutional research. Academy of Management Annals, 12, 154–177.
52.
LounsburyMichael (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 289–307.
53.
LounsburyMichaelVentrescaMarcHirschPaul M. (2003). Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1(1), 71–104.
54.
MairJohannaHehenbergerLisa (2014). Front stage and back stage convening: The transition from opposition to mutualistic co-existence in organizational philanthropy. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1174–1200.
55.
MairJohannaMartíIgnasiVentrescaMarc J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 819–850.
56.
MairJohannaWolfMiriamSeelosChristian (2016). Scaffolding: A process of transforming patterns of inequality in small-scale societies. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 2021–2044.
57.
MicelottaEvelynLounsburyMichaelGreenwoodRoyston (2017). Pathways of institutional change: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 43, 1885–1910.
58.
MilesMatthew B.HubermanA. Michael (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
59.
MohrJohn W.DuquenneVincent (1997). The duality of culture and practice: Poverty relief in New York City, 1888–1917. Theory and Society, 26, 305–356.
60.
NavisChadGlynnMary Ann (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 439–471.
61.
NichollsAlex (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1, 70–100.
62.
NichollsAlexTeasdaleSimon (2017). Neoliberalism by stealth? Exploring continuity and change within the UK social enterprise policy paradigm. Policy & Politics, 45, 323–341.
63.
O’DonohoeNickLeijonhufvudChristinaSaltukYaseminBugg-LevineAntonyBrandenburgMargot (2010). Impact Investments: An Emerging Asset Class.
64.
OrlikowskiWanda J. (2006). Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 460–466.
65.
OzcanPinarSantosFilipe M. (2015). The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1486–1512.
66.
PadgettJohn F.AnsellChristopher K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1259–1319.
67.
PadgettJohn F.PowellWalter W. (2012). The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
PurdyJill M.GrayBarbara (2009). Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 355–380.
69.
QuinnSarah (2008). The transformation of morals in markets: Death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 738–780.
70.
SantosFilipe M.EisenhardtKathleen M. (2009). Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 643–671.
71.
SchneibergMarc (2007). What’s on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5, 47–80.
72.
ScottW. Richard (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
73.
SepulvedaLeandro (2015). Social enterprise – A new phenomenon in the field of economic and social welfare?Social Policy & Administration, 49, 842–861.
74.
SgourevStoyan V. (2013). How Paris gave rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and fragmentation in radical innovation. Organization Science, 24, 1601–1617.
75.
SlagerRienekeGondJean-PascalMoonJeremy (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, 33, 763–790.
76.
Social Investment Task Force. (2000). Enterprising Communities: Wealth Beyond Welfare.
77.
Social Investment Task Force. (2005). Enterprising Communities: Wealth Beyond Welfare.
78.
Spiess-KnaflWolfgangAchleitnerAnn-Kristin (2012). Financing of social entrepreneurship. In Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business (pp. 157–173). Gabler Verlag.
79.
StrubenJeroenLeeBrandon H.BinghamChristopher B. (2020). Collective action problems and resource allocation during market formation. Strategy Science, 5, 245–270.
80.
Van de VenAndrew H. (1993). The emergence of an industrial infrastructure for technological innovation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 17, 338–365.
81.
Van de VenAndrew H.GarudRaghu (1993). Innovation and industry development: The case of cochlear implants. In RosenblumRichardBurgelmanRobert (Eds.), Research in technological innovation, management and policy (Vol. 5, pp. 1–46). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
82.
van WijkJakomijnStamWouterElfringTomZietsmaCharleneden HondFrank (2013). Activists and incumbents structuring change: The interplay of agency, culture, and networks in field evolution. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 358–386.
83.
YanShipengAlmandozJohnFerraroFabrizio (2021). The impact of logic (in)compatibility: Green investing, state policy, and corporate environmental performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–42.
84.
YinRobert K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
85.
ZietsmaCharleneGroenewegenPeterLogueDanielleHiningsC. R. (Bob) (2017). Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 391–450.
