This study examines the coincidence or discrepancy between the purpose of meetings stated in the organizer’s announcement and the purposes perceived by the participants. This analysis enriches and complexifies the view of meeting purposes in the literature. Based on structured questionnaire data from 1,946 respondents involved in 490 meetings conducted in the context of an international project, our analysis shows that the stated and perceived purposes of a meeting are not necessarily the same. In particular, a purpose expressed as a noun (e.g. Coordination) may be perceived by participants as various purposes expressed in verbs, that are strongly or weakly aligned with that noun (e.g. Socialize, Coordinate, Follow up or Persuade). This study establishes the need for a distinct line of research into the discrepancy between stated and perceived meeting purposes to understand meeting-related organizational dynamics, and it lays a basis for theorizing within that line of investigation by demonstrating an influence of the internal-external nature of meetings and the local culture. This study also highlights the core intermediation role of socialization for achieving the stated purposes of certain meeting types. Additionally, this study has immediate implications for organizing and managing meetings.
AdamsBrian E. (2004). Public meetings and the democratic process. Public Administration Review, 64, 43–54.
2.
AllenJoseph A.BeckTammy W. T.ScottCliff W.Rogelberg, StevenG. (2014). Understanding workplace meetings. A qualitative taxonomy of meetings purposes. Management Research Review, 37, 791–814.
3.
AllenJoseph A.Lehmann-WillenbrockNaleRogelbergSteven G. (2015a). An Introduction to the Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. In AllenJoseph A.Lehmann-WillenbrockNaleRogelbergSteven G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 3–11). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AllenJoseph A.SandsStephanie J.MuellerStephanie L.FrearKatherine A.MuddMaraRogelbergSteven G. (2012). Employees’ feeling about more meetings: An overt analysis and recommendations for improving meetings. Management Research Review, 35, 405–418.
5.
AllenJoseph A.YoergerMichael A.Lehmann-WillenbrockNaleJonesJohanna (2015b). Would you please stop that!? The relationship between counterproductive meeting behaviors, employee voice and trust. Journal of Management Development, 34, 1272–1287.
BakkenToreHernesTor (2006). Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets Whitehead. Organization Studies, 27, 1559–1616.
8.
BallardDawna I.GómezLuis F. (2006). Time to meet: Meetings as sites of organizational memory. In ParkerJo A.CrawfordMichaelHarrisPaul (Eds.), Study of time XII: Time and memory (pp. 301–312). Boston, MA: Brill.
BettisRichard A.GambardellaAlfonsoHelfatConstanceMitchellWill (2014). Theory in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1411–1413.
11.
BlondelVincent D.GuillaumeJean-LoupLambiotteRenaudLefebvreEtienne (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 1–12.
12.
BodenDeirdre (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in actions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
BodenDeirdre (1995). Agendas and arrangements: Everyday negotiations in meetings. In FirthAlan (Ed.), The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace (pp. 83–100). Oxford: Pergamon.
14.
BühlmannMarcMerkelWolfgangMüllerLisaWeßelsBernhard (2012). The democracy barometer: A new instrument to measure the quality of democracy and its potential for comparative research. European Political Science, 11, 519–536.
15.
ČechRadekMačutekJánŽabokrtskýZdeněk (2011). The role of syntax in complex networks: Local importance of verbs in a syntactic dependency network. Physica A, 390(2011), 3614–3623.
16.
CEPAL, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (2018). Observatorio Demográfico. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.
17.
DamasioAntónio R.TranelDaniel (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 90, 4957–4960.
18.
De AlmeidaRoberto G.ManouilidouCristina (2015). The study of verbs in cognitive science. In ManouilidouCristinaDe AlmeidaRoberto G. (Eds.), Cognitive science perspectives on verb representation and processing (pp. 3–40). New York: Springer.
19.
DeetzStanley A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20.
DeetzStanley A. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7, 191–207.
21.
EnglishCrystal B. (1987). The art of leading meetings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 321–326.
22.
FreemanLinton C. (1978/1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 215–239.
FruchtermanThomas M. J.ReingoldEdward M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software – Practice and Experience, 21, 1129–1164 (November1991).
25.
HBS, Harvard Business School (2006). Running meetings. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
26.
HildrethRichard A. (1990). The essentials of meeting management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
HinkelHollyAllenJoseph A. (2013). Speaking up and working harder: How participation in decision making in meetings impacts overall engagement. Journal of Psychology Inquiry, 18, 7–16.
28.
HofstedeGeert (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
HoranAnne P. (2002). An effective workplace stress management intervention: Chicken soup for the soul at work employee groups. Work, 18, 3–13.
31.
IpsenMereteNøhrSusanne B. (2009). The three-hour meeting: A socio-cultural approach to engage junior doctors. Education Medical Teacher, 31, 933–937.
32.
JarzabkowskiPaulaSeidlDavid (2008). The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29, 1391–1426.
33.
KauffeldSimoneLehmann-WillenbrockNale (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43, 130–158.
34.
KelloJohn E. (2015). The science and practice of workplace meetings. In AllenJoseph A.Lehmann-WillenbrockNaleRogelbergSteven G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 709–734). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KeytonJoannStallworthValerie A. (2002). On the verge of collaboration: Identifying group structure and process. In FreyLawrence R. (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (pp. 235–262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
KöhlerTineCramtonCatherine D.HindsPamela J. (2012). The meeting genre across cultures: Insights from three German–American collaborations. Small Groups Research, 43, 159–185.
37.
KöhlerTineGölzMarkus (2015). Meetings across cultures: Cultural differences in meeting expectations and processes. In AllenJoseph A.Lehmann-WillenbrockNaleRogelbergSteven G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 119–149). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
KorzybskiAlfred (1958). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Lakeville, CT: International Non-Aristotelian Library.
39.
KrippendorffKlaus (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: SAGE Publications.
40.
LeachDesmond J.RogelbergSteven G.WarrPeter B.BurnfieldJennifer L. (2009). Perceived meeting effectiveness: The role of design characteristics. Journal of Business Psychology, 24, 65–76.
41.
Lehmann-WillenbrockNaleAllenJoseph A.MeineckeAnnika L. (2013). Observing culture: Differences in U.S.–American and German team meeting behaviors. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 252–271.
42.
López-FresnoPalmira (2018). Estudio exploratorio sobre el concepto, tipología y significados de las reuniones de trabajo. Tesis doctoral. Directora: Rosalía Cascón-Pereira. Tarragona: Universitat Rovira i Virgili.
43.
López-FresnoPalmiraGrandes-CarciMercedes (2010). Cómo lograr la mejor reunion y optimizar sus resultados [How to achieve the best meeting and optimize its results]. Madrid: Spanish Standardization Organization (AENOR).
44.
López-FresnoPalmiraSavolainenTaina (2014). Working meetings: A tool for building or destroying trust in knowledge creation and sharing. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 137–143.
45.
MatejkaKenJulianRamona (1994). Meeting is such sweet sorrow. Management Decision, 32(4), 62–64.
46.
MongePeter M.McSweenCharlesWyerJoAnne (1989). A profile of meetings in corporate America: Results of the 3M meeting effectiveness study. Los Angeles, CA: Annenberg School of Communications, University of Southern California.
47.
MorinEdgar (2008). On complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
48.
MosvickRoger K.NelsonRobert B. (1987). We’ve got to stop meetings like this! A guide to successful business meeting management. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
NewmanMark (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
NewmanMark E. J.WattsDuncan J.StrogatzSteven H. (2002). Random graph models of social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States, 99(1), 2566–2572.
52.
O’DeaNatalie A.de ChazalPamSaltmanDeborah C.KiddMichael R. (2006). Running effective meetings: A primer for doctors. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 82, 454–461.
53.
PouthierVanessa (2017). Griping and joking as identification rituals and tools for engagement in cross-boundary team meetings. Organization Studies, 38, 753–774.
54.
RepaMelissa J. (2015). Leadership to support e-quality for all: A study of a systemwide accessible technology policy implementation. Dissertation. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/48497063.pdf.
55.
RogelbergSteven G. (2006). Meetings at work. In RogelbergSteven G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 474–475).
56.
RogelbergSteven G. (2019). The surprising science of meetings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
RogelbergSteven G.AllenJoseph A.ShanockLinda R.ScottCliffShufflerMarissa (2010). Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 49, 149–172.
58.
RogelbergSteven G.LeachDesmond J.WarrPeter B.BurnfieldJennifer L. (2006). Not another meeting! Are meeting time demands related to employee well-being?Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 83–96.
59.
RogelbergSteven G.ScottCliffKelloJohn (2007). The science and fiction of meetings. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(29), 18–21.
60.
RogelbergSteven G.ShanockLinda R.ScottCliff (2012). Wasted time and money in meetings: Increasing return on investment. Small Group Research, 43, 236–245.
61.
RomanoNicholas C.NunamakerJay F.Jr. (2001). Meeting analysis: Findings from research and practice. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Washington: IEEE Computer Society.
SchildtHenriMantereSakuCornelissenJoep (2020). Power in sensemaking processes. Organization Studies, 41, 241–265.
64.
SchwartzmanHelen B. (1986). The meeting as a neglected social form in organizational studies. In CummingsLarry L.StawBarry M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 233–258). Greenwich, VT: JAI Press.
65.
SchwartzmanHelen B. (1989). The meeting. New York: Plenum Press.
66.
ScottCliffAllenJoseph A.RogelbergSteven G.KelloAlex (2015). Five theoretical lenses for conceptualizing the role of meetings in organizational life. In AllenJoseph A.Lehmann-WillenbrockNaleRogelbergSteven G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 20–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
67.
StrayViktoria G.MoeNils B.DybåTore (2012). Escalation of commitment: A longitudinal case study of daily meetings. In WohlinClaes (Ed.), Agile processes in software engineering and extreme programming (pp. 153–167). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
68.
TracyKarenDimockAaron (2004). Meetings: Discursive sites for building and fragmenting community. Annals of the International Communication Association, 28, 127–165.
69.
TsoukasHaridimos (2017). Don’t simplify, complexify: From disjunctive to conjunctive theorizing in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 132–153.
70.
TukeyJohn W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
71.
TurekianVaughan C.MacindoeSarahCopelandDarylDavisLloyd S.PatmanRobert G.PozzaMaria (2015). The emergence of science diplomacy. In DavisLloyd S.PatmanRobert G. (Eds.), Science diplomacy. New day or false dawn? (pp. 3–24). Singapore et al.: World Scientific.
72.
Universidad de Vigo (n.d.). ADESSE. Base de datos de Verbos, Alternancias de Diátesis y Esquemas Sintáctico-Semánticos del Español. http://adesse.uvigo.es/data/verbos.php.
73.
Van VreeWilbert (1999). Meetings, manners and civilization: The development of modern meeting behaviour. London: Leicester University Press.
74.
VenturiniTommasoJacomyMathieuJensenPablo (2019). What do we see when we look at networks? An introduction to visual network analysis and force-directed layouts. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.02202.pdf.
75.
ViglioccoGabriellaVinsonDavid P.DruksJuditBarberHoracioCappaStefano F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, 35, 407–426.
76.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine (1994). Social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77.
WeickKarl E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
78.
WelbersKasperVan AtteveldtWouterBenoitKenneth (2017). Text analysis in R. Communications Methods and Measures, 11(4), 245–265.
79.
WhiteheadAlfred N. (1978 [1929]). Process and reality. New York: Free Press.
YoergerMichaelCroweJohnAllenJoseph A. (2015). Participate or else! The effect of participation in decision-making in meetings on employee engagement. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67, 65–80.
