Drawing on an ethnography of software engineering teams that introduced a new and empowerment-centered productivity scheme, this study delineates how, despite management’s affirmation of its commitment, software engineers produced and reproduced a ‘culture of uncertainty’ characterized by constant doubt about how long the scheme would last. Engineers shared previous experiences of failed productivity schemes and collectively used this organizational memory to understand their new situation. Workers drew on this organizational memory in everyday interaction to sustain a culture in which everyday management decisions served as indicators of management’s potential abandonment of the scheme; as a result, workers remained uncommitted to the scheme. Workers interactionally employed organizational memory as a resource that they used to interpret and respond to changes. Analysis of this process shows the links between organizational memory, culture creation, and culture’s influence on productivity scheme changes.
AbrahamssonP.WarstaJ.SiponenM. T.RonkainenJ. (2003). New directions on agile methods: A comparative analysis. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 244–254.
3.
AntebyM.MolnarV. (2016). Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 515–540.
4.
BarleyS. R.TolbertP. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 1, 93–117.
5.
BechkyB. A. (2011). Making organizational theory work: Institutions, occupations, and negotiated orders. Organization Science, 22(5), 1157–1167.
6.
BeckerH. S.GeerB.HughesE. C.StraussA. L. (1977). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. New York: Transaction.
7.
BeerM.EisenstatR.SpectorB. (1990). Why change programs don’t produce change. Harvard Business Review, 67(6), 158–166.
8.
BoehmB.TurnerR. (2005). Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations. IEEE Software. September/October: 30–39.
9.
CohnM. (2010). Succeeding with Agile: Software development using Scrum. Boston: Pearson Education.
10.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
EmirbayerM.MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.
12.
FayardA.Van MaanenJ. (2015). Making culture visible: Reflections on corporate ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 4(1), 4–27.
13.
FiedlerMWelpeI. (2010). How do organizations remember? The influence of organizational structure on organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31, 381–407.
14.
FineG. A. (1979). Small groups and culture creation: The idioculture of little league baseball team. American Sociological Review, 44, 773–745.
15.
FineG. A. (1984). Negotiated orders and organization cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 239–262.
16.
FineG. A.HallettT. (2014). Group cultures and the everyday life of organizations: Interaction orders and meso-analysis. Organization Studies, 35(12), 1773–1792.
17.
FordJ. D.FordL. W.D’AmelioA. (2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362–377.
18.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine.
20.
HalbwachsM. (1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
21.
HallettT. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75, 52–74.
22.
HallettT.VentrescaM. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35, 213–236.
23.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.
24.
JansenJ. S. (2007). Resurrection and appropriation: Reputational trajectories, memory work, and the political use of historical figures. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 953–1007.
25.
KanterR. M. (1989). When giants learn to dance: Mastering the challenges of strategy, management and careers in the 1990s. New York: Simon and Schuster.
26.
KanterR. M.SteinB. A.JickT. D. (1992). The challenge of organizational change. New York: The Free Press.
27.
KatzJ. (2001). Analytical induction. In SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 480–484). Oxford: Elsevier.
28.
KirkmanB. L.RosenB. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58–74.
29.
KirkmanB. L.ShapiroD. L. (1997). The impact of cultural values on employee resistance to teams: Toward a model of globalized self-managing work team effectiveness. The Academy of Management Review, 22, 730–757,
30.
LabiancaG.GrayB.BrassD. J. (2000). A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organization Science, 11, 235–257.
31.
LarmanC. (2004). Agile & iterative development: A management’s guide. New York: Pearson Education.
MoeN. B.DingsøyrT.DybåT. (2010). A teamwork model for understanding an Agile team: A case study of a Scrum project. Information and Software Technology, 52, 480–491.
34.
MoormanC.MinerA. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 23, 698–723.
35.
MorrillC. (2008). Culture and organization theory. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619, 15–40.
36.
MumbyD. K. (2005). Theorizing resistance in organization studies: A dialectical approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 1–26.
37.
NerurA.MahapatraR.MangalarajG. (2005). Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 72–79.
38.
OlickJ. K. (1999). Collective memory: The two cultures. Sociological Theory, 17, 333–348.
39.
OlickJ. K. (2003). States of memory: Continuities, conflicts, and transformations in national retrospection. Durham: Duke University Press.
40.
OlickJ. K. (2007). The politics of regret: On collective memory and historical responsibility. London: Routledge.
41.
OlickJ. K.RobbinsJ. (1998). Social memory studies: From ‘collective memory’ to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105–140.
42.
OrrJ. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
43.
OuchiW. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–141.
44.
OuchiW. G. (1981). Theory Z. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45.
PfefferJ. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 1–52.
46.
PalmerS. R.FelsingJ. M. (2002). A practical guide to feature-driven development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47.
PaulkM. C.WeberC. V.CurtisB.ChrissisM. B. (1995). The capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the software process. Indianapolis, IN: Addison-Wesley Professional.
48.
RowlinsonM.BoothC.ClarkP.DelahayeA.ProcterS. (2009). Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31, 69–87.
49.
RoyceW. W. (1970). Managing the development of large software systems. Proceedings of IEEE WESCON, 26, 1–9.
50.
SchafferR. H.ThomsonH. A. (1992). Successful change programs begins with results. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 80–89.
51.
ScheinE. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
52.
SchwaberK. (2004). Agile project management with Scrum. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
53.
SheridanJ. E. (1992). Organizational culture and employee retention. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 1036–1056.
54.
SwidlerA. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
55.
TavoryI.TimmermansS. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
WadhwaniR. D.BucheliM. (2014). The future of the past in management and organization studies. In WadhawaniR. D.BucheliM. (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
WalshJ. P.UngsonG. R. (1991). Organizational memory. The Academy of Management Review, 16, 57–91.
58.
WeeksJ. (2003). Unpopular culture: The ritual of complaint in a British bank. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
WillisP. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
60.
WoodM. (2002). Mind the gap? A processual reconsideration of organizational knowledge. Organization, 9(1), 151–171.
61.
ZelizerB. (1995). Reading the past against the grain: The shape of memory studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12, 214–39.
62.
ZuckerL. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.
