As more individuals are working remotely, many feel increasingly isolated and socially adrift. To address this challenge, many independent workers are choosing to work in coworking spaces – shared spaces where individuals do their own work but in the presence of others with the express purpose of being part of a community. In this qualitative, single case study, we analyze how members of a coworking space work together to co-construct a sense of community through their day-to-day interactions in the space. We apply a relational constructionist lens to unpack the processes of ‘community work’ as an interactive, agentic process. We identify three types of collective actions, or interacts, that contribute to a sense of community: endorsing, encountering, and engaging. These interacts represent different forms of community work that members interactively accomplish to maintain a desired community experience. The rapidly growing coworking movement offers insights, as uncovered in this study, on how to integrate a sense of community into the world of work.
AdlerP. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12, 215–234.
2.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E.FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491.
3.
BacharachS. B.BambergerP. A.SonnenstuhlW. J. (2001). Mutual aid and union renewal: Cycles of logics of action. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
BarleyS. R.KundaG. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12, 76–95.
5.
BellahR. N.MadsonN.SullivanW. M.SwidlerA.TiptonS. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6.
BoydN. M. (2014). A 10-year retrospective of organization studies in community psychology: content, theory, and impact. Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 237–254.
7.
BoydN.NowellB. (2014). Sense of community in organizational settings: A new construct for the field of management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23, 107–122.
8.
BrintS. (2001). Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory, 19, 1–23.
9.
BurroughsS.EbyL. (1998). Psychological sense of community at work: A measurement system and explanatory framework. Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 509–532.
10.
CartwrightD. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In CartwrightD.ZanderA. (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed., pp. 91–109). New York: Harper & Row.
11.
CooperC. D.KurlandN. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 511–532.
12.
CzarniawskaB. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Herndon: Copenhagen Business School Press.
13.
DavenportT. H.PearlsonK. (1998). Two cheers for the virtual office. Sloan Management Review, 39, 51–65.
14.
DavidsonW. B.CotterP. R. (1991). The relationship between sense of community and subjective well-being: A first look. Journal of Community Psychology, 19(3), 246–253.
15.
DeGuzmanG. V.TangA. I. (2011). Working in the unoffice: A guide to coworking for indie workers, small businesses, and nonprofits. San Francisco, CA: Night Owls Press LLC.
16.
DiMaggioP. (2009). The twenty-first-century firm: Changing economic organization in international perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
DurkheimE. (1933). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.
18.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
19.
FeldmanM. S.PentlandB. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–121.
20.
GarudR.JainS.TuertscherP. (2008). Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organization Studies, 29, 351–371.
21.
GehmanJ.TrevinoL. K.GarudR. (2013). Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 84–112.
22.
GergenK. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicolson.
24.
GoffmanE. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
25.
GoldenT. D.VeigaJ. F.DinoR. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter?Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412.
26.
GozdzK. (Ed.). (1995). Community building: Renewing spirit & learning in business. San Francisco, CA: New Leaders Press.
27.
GrantA. M.ParkerS. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 317–375.
28.
GubriumJ.HolsteinJ. (2008). The constructionist mosaic. In HolsteinJ.GubriumJ. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 3–12). London: Guildford Press.
29.
GusfieldJ. R. (1975). Community: A critical response. New York: Harper & Row.
30.
HamptonK. N.GuptaN. (2008). Community & social interaction in the wireless city: Wi-fi use in public & semi-public spaces. New Media & Society, 10(6), 831–850.
31.
HewlinP. F. (2003). And the award for best actor goes to…: Façades of conformity in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 633–642.
32.
HilleryG. A. (1955). Definitions of community: Areas of agreement. Rural Sociology, 20, 111–123.
33.
HoskingD. M. (2006). Discourses of relations and relational processes. In KyriakidouO.OzbilginM. (Eds.), Relational perspectives in organization studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
34.
HoskingD. M. (2011). Telling tales of relations: Appreciating relational constructionism. Organization Studies, 32(1), 47–65.
35.
JohnsT.GrattonL. (2013). The third wave of virtual work. Harvard Business Review, 91, 66–73.
36.
KegleyJ. A. K. (1997). Genuine individuals and genuine communities: A Roycean public philosophy. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
37.
KelliherC.AndersonD. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63, 83–106.
38.
KundaG. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech organization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
39.
LatourB. (1986). The powers of association. In LawJ. (Ed.), Power, action, and belief (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge.
40.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggS.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
42.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
ManningG.CurtisK.McMillenS. (1996). Building community: The human side of work. Cincinnati, OH: Thompson Executive Press.
44.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
45.
McKennaK. Y.GreenA. S.GleasonM. E. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9–31.
46.
McMillanD. W. (2011). Sense of community, a theory not a value: A response to Nowell and Boyd. Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 507–519.
47.
McMillanD. W.ChavisD. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.
48.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
NaylorT. H.WillimonW. H.ÖsterbergR. (1996). The search for community in the workplace. Business and Society Review, 97, 42–47.
50.
NewtonT.DeetzS.ReedM. (2011). Responses to social constructionism and critical realism in organization studies. Organization Studies, 32(1), 7–26.
51.
NowellB.BoydN. (2010). Viewing community as responsibility versus resource: Deconstructing the theoretical roots of psychological sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 828–841.
52.
OldenburgR. (1989). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. New York: Paragon House.
53.
O’MahonyS.LakhaniK. R. (2011). Organizations in the shadow of communities. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 33, 3–36.
54.
PetersonN. A.SpeerP. W.McMillanD. W. (2008). Validation of a brief sense of community scale: Confirmation of the principal theory of sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1), 61–73.
55.
PhillipsN.LawrenceT. B. (2012). The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 223–230.
56.
PrettyG. M. H.ConroyC.DugayJ.FowlerK.WilliamsD. (1996). Sense of community and its relevance to adolescents of all ages. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 365–379.
57.
PrezzaM.CostantiniS. (1998). Sense of community and life satisfaction: Investigation in three different territorial contexts. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8, 181–194.
58.
RobertsL. M. (2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 685–711.
59.
SennettR. (1977). The Fall of Public Man. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
60.
SergiovanniT. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61.
SimmelG. (1949). The sociology of sociability. (translated by HughesE. C.). American Journal of Sociology, 55, 254–261.
62.
SimmelG. (1950). Sociability: An example of pure or formal sociology. In WolffKurt H. (Ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.
63.
SinghP.BhandarkarA.RaiS. (2012). Millennials and the workplace: Challenges for architecting the organizations of tomorrow. New Delhi: Sage.
64.
SnowD. A.AndersonL. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1336–1371.
65.
SpinuzziC. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 399–441.
66.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory (2nd edn). London: Sage.
67.
SullivanS. E.MainieroL. A. (2007). Kaleidoscope careers: Benchmarking ideas for fostering family-friendly workplaces. Organizational Dynamics, 36(1), 45–62.
68.
SveningssonS.AlvessonM. (2003). Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle. Human Relations, 56, 1163–1193.
69.
TönniesF. (1957 [1887]). Community and society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
70.
WeberM. (1978 [1921]). Economy and society. (RothG.WittichC., Eds. & Trans.) Berkeley: University of California Press.
71.
WeeksJ. (2004). Unpopular culture: The ritual of complaint in a British bank. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72.
WeickK. E. (2006). The role of values in high-risk organizations. In CameronK. S.HessE. D. (Eds.), Leading with values: Positivity, virtue, and high performance (pp. 55–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.
73.
WengerE. C.SnyderW. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139–145.
74.
WhittleA.MuellerF. (2009). ‘I could be dead for two weeks and my boss would never know’: Telework and the politics of representation. New Technology, Work & Employment, 24, 131–143.
75.
WittgensteinL. (1953). Philosophical investigations (AnscombeG. E. M., Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
76.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
