The terms social constructionism and (social) constructivism are employed in the context of different problematics and different philosophical assumptions. This article presents ‘relational constructionism’ as a social science perspective. The perspective centres language-based relational processes as they (re)construct more or less local relational realities. The latter includes western individualism and its construction of the bounded, separately existing individual relating to a separately existing other where ‘other’ is everything which is not self; this has been called ‘hard’ self-other differentiation. The perspective of relational constructionism allows that ‘soft’ self-other differentiation also is possible — for example, in the practice of relationally engaged inquiry and change work. Relational constructionism, as outlined here, has a number of distinctive features: it clearly speaks about ontology and power (unlike many other constructionisms); it centres and gives ontology to construction processes (to how, rather than what) and sees persons and worlds as emerging in processes (rather than assuming individual minds and actions); it opens up the possibility of soft self-other differentiation (rather than assuming that ‘hard differentiation is ‘how it really is’); and it centres dialogical practices as ways of relating that can enable and support multiple local forms of life rather than imposing one dominant rationality on others.
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. ( 2000). Doing critical management research. London: SAGE.
2.
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. ( 2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53 (9), 1125-1149.
3.
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. ( 2000). Reflexive methodology. London: SAGE.
4.
Anderson, H. ( 1997). Conversation, language, and possibilities: A postmodern approach to therapy. New York: Harper Collins.
5.
Barrett, F., & Cooperrider, D. (1990). Generative metaphor intervention: A new approach for working with systems divided by conflict and caught in defensive perception. The Journal of Behavioural Science, 26 (2), 219-239.
6.
Barrett, F., Fann, G.T., & Hocevar, S.P. ( 1995). The central role of discourse in large scale change: A social construction perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 31 (3), 352-372.
7.
Bateson, G. ( 1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York : Chandler Publ. Co.
8.
Bem, S., & Looren de Jong, H. (2006). Theoretical issues in psychology, 2nd edn. London : SAGE.
9.
Benton, T., & Craib, I. ( 2001). Philosophy of social science. Basingstoke : Palgrave.
10.
Bentz, V.M., & Shapiro, J.J. ( 1998). Mindful inquiry in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
Berman, M. ( 1981). The re-enchantment of the world. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
12.
Berman, M. ( 1990). Coming to our senses. New York: Bantam.
13.
Bhaskar, R. ( 1989). Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.
14.
Bohm, D. ( 2004). On dialogue. London: Routledge.
15.
Chasin, R., Herzig, M., Roth, S.A., Chasin, L., & Becker, C. ( 1996). From diatribe to dialogue on divisive public issues: Approaches drawn from family therapy. Mediation Quarterly , 13 (4), 323-344.
16.
Chia, R. ( 1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16 (4), 579-604.
17.
Chia, R. ( 1996). The problem of reflexivity in organizational research: Towards a postmodern science of organization. Organization , 3 (1), 31-59.
Dachler, H.P., & Hosking, D.M. ( 1995). The primacy of relations in socially constructing organizational realities. In D. M. Hosking, H. P. Dachler, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Management and organization: Relational alternatives to individualism (pp. 1-28). Aldershot: Avebury.
20.
Danziger, K. ( 1997). The varieties of social construction: Essay review. Theory and Psychology, 7 (3), 399-416.
21.
Deetz, S. ( 1994). The new politics of the workplace: Ideology and other unobtrusive controls. In H. Simons & M. Billig (Eds.), After postmodernism: Reconstructing ideology critique (pp. 172-199). London: SAGE.
22.
Deetz, S. ( 2000). Describing differences in approaches to organisation science. In P. Frost, R. Lewin, & D. Daft (Eds.), Talking about organization science. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
Fairclough, N. ( 2005). Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26 (6), 915-939.
24.
Fleetwood, S. ( 2005). Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective. Organization, 12 (2), 197-222.
25.
Foucault, M. ( 1980[1977]). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon.
26.
Friere, P. ( 1982). Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In B. Hall, A. Gillete, & R.Tandon (Eds.), Creating knowledge: A monopoly? Participatory research in development. New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in India.
27.
Gergen, K.J. ( 1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Gergen, K.J. ( 1995). Relational theory and the discourses of power. In D. M. Hosking, H. P. Dachler, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Management and organization: Relational alternatives to individualism (pp. 29-51). Aldershot : Avebury.
29.
Gergen, K.J., McNamee, S., & Barrett, F. ( 2001). Toward transformative dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration, 24 (7/8), 679-707.
30.
Greene, J., & Abma, T. ( 2001). Responsive evaluation. San Francisco : Jossey Bass.
31.
Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. ( 2008). The constructionist mosaic. In J. Holstein & J. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 3-12). London: Guildford Press.
32.
Harding, S. ( 1986). The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
33.
Harding, S. ( 1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
34.
Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. ( 2004). Power and change: A critical reflection. In J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational change and learning (pp. 343-370). Chichester: Wiley.
35.
Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Clegg, S. ( 2001). Reflexivity in organization and management theory: A study of the production of the research subject. Human Relations , 54 (5), 531-560.
36.
Hermans, H.J., Kempen, H., & Van Loon, R.J.P. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47 (1), 23-33.
37.
Hollis, M. ( 1994). The philosophy of social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Hora, E. ( 1992) Quoted in ‘The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism’. American Psychologist, 47 (1), 23-33.
39.
Hosking, D.M. ( 1995). Constructing power: Entitative and relational approaches . In D. M. Hosking, H. P. Dachler, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Management and organization: Relational alternatives to individualism (pp. 51-71). Aldershot : Avebury.
40.
Hosking, D.M. ( 2000). Ecology in mind, mindful practices. European Journal for Work and Organizational Psychology, 9 (2), 147-158.
41.
Hosking, D.M. ( 2004). Change works: A critical construction. In J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational change and learning (pp. 259-278). Chichester: Wiley.
42.
Hosking, D.M. ( 2008). Can constructionism be critical? In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 669-686). New York: Guilford Publications.
43.
Hosking, D.M., & Morley, I. ( 1991). A social psychology of organising. Chichester: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
44.
Hosking, D.M., & Morley, I. ( 2004). Social constructionism in community and applied social psychology. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology , 14, 1-14.
45.
Hunt, J., & Dodge, G.E. ( 2000). Leadership déjà vu all over again. The Leadership Quarterly Review of Leadership, 11(4), 435-458.
46.
Isaacs, W. ( 1993) Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics (Autumn), 24-39.
47.
Isaacs, W. ( 1996). The process and potential of dialogue in social change . Educational Technology, Jan-Feb: 20-30.
48.
Kyriakidou, O., & Ozbilgin, M. ( 2006). Relational perspectives in organizational studies. Cheltenham: Elgar.
49.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. ( 1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York : Basic Books.
50.
Latour, B. ( 1987). Science in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
51.
Manicas, P.T., & Secord, P. ( 1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychologist (April), 399-413.
52.
Martin, J. ( 2004) Organizational culture: Pieces of the puzzle. In J. Shafritz, S. Ott, & Yan Sek Jang (Eds.), Classics of organizational theory (pp. 393-414). New York: Wadsworth.
53.
McNamee, S. ( 2006) Appreciative evaluation in an educational context: Inviting conversations of assessment and development. In D. M. Hosking & S. McNamee (Eds.), The social construction of organization (pp. 211-224). Copenhagen : Liber.
54.
McNamee, S., & Gergen, K., et al. (1999). Relational responsibility: Resources for sustainable dialogue. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.
55.
Morley, I., & Hunt, G. (n.d.). Philosophy and psychology: The design and implementation of theories. Warwick University.
56.
Newman, F., & Holzman, L. ( 1997). The end of knowing. London: Routledge.
57.
Newton, T. ( 2003). Crossing the great divide: Time, nature and the social . Sociology, 37 (3), 433-457.
58.
Parker, M. ( 1995). Critique in the name of what? Postmodernism and critical approaches to organization. Organization Studies, 16, 553-564.
59.
Pearce, W.B. ( 1992). A ‘camper’s’ guide to constructionisms . Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation & Management, 3, 139-161.
60.
Reason, P. ( 1994) Participation in Human Inquiry, London : SAGE.
61.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. ( 2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: SAGE.
62.
Rorty, R. ( 1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
Sampson, E.E. ( 1988). Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist , 43 (1), 15-22.
64.
Sampson, E.E. ( 1993). Celebrating the other. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
65.
Shotter, J. ( 1991). The rhetorical-responsive nature of mind: A social constructionist account. In A. Still & A. Costall (Eds.), Against cognitivism: Alternative foundations for cognitive psychology (pp. 55-79). Hemel Hempstead : Harvester.
66.
Shrivastva, S., & Cooperrider, D. (1990). Appreciative management and leadership: The power of positive thought and action in organizations . San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
67.
Stacey, R. ( 2003). Strategic management and organizational dynamics. Harlow: Pearson Education.
68.
Stenner, P., & Eccleston, C. ( 1994). On the textuality of being. Theory and Psychology, 4 (1), 85-103.
69.
Toulmin, S., & Gustavsen, B. ( 1996) Beyond theory: Changing organizations through participation . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
70.
Uhl-Bien, M. ( 2004). Relational leadership approaches. In G. R. Goethals, G. J. Sorenson , & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership. Los Angeles: SAGE.
71.
Vico, G. ( 1992). The new science. Quoted in‘The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism’. American Psychologist , 47 (1), 23-33.
72.
Weick, K. ( 1979). The social psychology of organising, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley .
73.
Weinberg, D. ( 2008). The philosophical foundations of constructionist research . In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 13-40). New York: Guilford Publications
74.
Wertsch, J.V. ( 1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
75.
Wittgenstein, L. ( 1953). Philosophical investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe . Oxford: Blackwell.
76.
Woolgar, S. ( 1996). Psychology, qualitative methods and ideas of science . In J. T. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 11-25). Leicester: BPS.
