This article, first, proposes critical grounded theory (CGT) as a way to develop systematically an array of methods and theoretical propositions into a coherent critical methodology for organization studies (and beyond). Second, it demonstrates CGT’s usefulness through a case study of competing recovery projects from the Icelandic financial crisis. CGT is developed in engagement with the emerging paradigm of cultural political economy (CPE) and its preferred method of critical discourse analysis (CDA). CPE analyses the evolution of ‘economic imaginaries’ in both their structural/material and semiotic/discursive dimensions. This requires a critical realist, multi-dimensional research strategy which emphasizes ethnographic methods and substantial theoretical and historical work. The proposed methodology of CGT enables a retroductive research process that combines deductive theoretical deskwork with inductive fieldwork enabled by grounded theory tools to analyse organizational process, stability and change.
Al-AmoudiI.WillmottH. (2011). Where Constructionism and Critical Realism Converge: Interrogating the Domain of Epistemological Relativism. Organization Studies, 32, 27-46.
2.
AlvessonM.WillmottH. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17, 432–464.
BelfrageC.BerryD. M. (2011). In-studio interview on Silfur Egils (weekly politics talkshow), Broadcast by The Icelandic National Broadcasting Service on 22nd of May, 2011.
6.
BelfrageC.BergmannE.BerryD. (2015). A critique of neo-mercantilist analyses of Icelandic political economy and crisis. Capital & Class, 39, 515–536.
7.
BelfrageC.HaufF. (2015). Critical Grounded Theory for Cultural Political Economy. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 4, 324–340.
8.
BhaskarR. (2009). Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Routledge.
9.
BurawoyM. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16, 4–33.
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publicaitons.
11.
ChiaR. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16, 579–604.
12.
CollierA. (1994). Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. London: Verso.
13.
CurtisR. (2014). Foucault beyond Fairclough: From transcendental to immanent critique in organization studies. Organization Studies. Epub ahead of print, 27August2014. doi: 10.1177/0170840614546150.
14.
DebrayR. (1973). Prison writings (SheedR. Trans.). London: Allen Lane.
15.
DelbridgeR. (2014). Promising futures: CMS, post-disciplinarity, and the new public social science. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 95–117.
16.
EastonG. (2010). Critical realism in case study research. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 118–128.
17.
FaircloughN. (2005). Peripheral Vision. Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26, 915–939.
18.
FaircloughN. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2nd edition (pp. 162–186). London: SAGE Publications.
19.
FendtJ.SachsW. (2008). Grounded theory method in management research: Users’ perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 430–455.
20.
FleetwoodS.AckroydS. (Eds.) (2004). Critical realist applications in organization and management studies. London: Routledge.
21.
GissurarsonH. H. (2004). Miracle on Iceland. Wall Street Journal, 29.1.
22.
GlaserB. G. (1992). Emergence vs. forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
23.
GlaserB. (1999). The future of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 836–845.
24.
GlaserB. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
25.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
26.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31.
27.
GylfasonT. (2012). From collapse to constitution: The case of Iceland. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com.
28.
HoltR.MuellerF. (2011). Wittgenstein, Heidegger and drawing lines in organization studies. Organization Studies, 32, 67–84.
29.
Iceland (2010). Aðdragandi og orsakir falls íslensku bankanna 2008 og tengdir atburðir. [Report of the Special Investigation Commission]. Reykjavík: Rannsóknarnefnd Alþingis.
30.
JaeggiR. (2014). Alienation. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
JessopB. (2009). Cultural political economy and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3, 336–356.
32.
JessopB. (2013). Recovered imaginaries, imagined recoveries: A cultural political economy of crisis construals and crisis-management in the North Atlantic financial crisis. In BennerM. (Ed.), Before and beyond the global economic crisis: Economics, politics and settlement (pp. 234–254). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33.
JessopB.OosterlynckS. (2008). Cultural political economy: On making the cultural turn without falling into soft economic sociology. Geoforum, 39, 1155–1169.
34.
JessopB.SumN. L. (2006). The Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in their Place. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
35.
KrugmanP. (2011). A Song of Ice and Ire: Iceland in context. Presented at ConferenceIceland’s Recovery: Lessons and Challenges, 27October, co-hosted by the International Monetary Fund, Central Bank of Iceland and Iceland Ministry of Economic Affairs. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2011/isl/index.htm (accessed 10 November 2011).
LevyD. L.SpicerA. (2013). Contested imaginaries and the cultural political economy of climate change. Organization, 20, 659–678.
38.
MorganG.FroudJ.QuackS.SchneibergM. (2011). Capitalism in crisis: Organizational perspectives. Organization, 18, 147–152.
39.
National Forum 2010 (2010). Main conclusions [Þjóðfundur 2010]. Retrieved from thjodfundur2010.is.
40.
NewtonT.DeetzS.ReedM. (2011). Responses to social constructionism and critical realism in organization studies. Organization Studies, 32, 7–26.
41.
OliverC. (2012). Critical realist grounded theory: A new approach for social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 371–387.
42.
O’ReillyD.ReedM. (2011) The grit in the oyster: Professionalism, managerialism and leaderism as discourses of UK public services modernization. Organization Studies, 32, 1079–1101.
43.
OrtonJ. D. (1997). From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13, 419–438.
44.
ReedM. (2005). Reflections on the ‘realist turn’ in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1621–1644.
45.
SayerA. (1992). Method in social science. London: Routledge.
46.
SayerA. (1998). Abstraction: A realist interpretation. In ArcherM. S.BhaskarR.CollierA.LawsonT.NorrieA. (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 120–143). London: Routledge.
47.
StockhammerE. (2008). Some stylized facts on the finance-dominated accumulation regime. Competition & Change, 12, 184–202.
48.
SuddabyR. (2006). From the Editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633–642.
49.
SumN. L.JessopB. (2013). Towards a cultural political economy: Putting culture in its place in political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
50.
ThompsonP.HarleyB. (2012). Beneath the radar? A critical realist analysis of ‘the knowledge economy’ and ‘shareholder value’ as competing discourses. Organization Studies, 33, 1363–1381.
51.
Van der SwanN. (2014). Making sense of financialisation. Socio-Economic Review, 12, 99–129.
52.
WadeR. (2009). Iceland as Icarus. Challenge, 52, 5–33.
