We present the first elaboration of the field-level institutional repair work enacted by government inquiry reports into severe and protracted breaches of the institution of medicine in the English National Health Service. Our examination of the interplay between the rhetorical argumentation strategies communicated, the modes and types of institutional work conveyed, and the institutional pillars targeted for repair enhances understanding of field-level institutional repair work in three ways. First, our analysis of forensic and deliberative rhetoric reveals how these communicate aligned ethos, logos, and pathos appeals in a tactical buttressing manner that simultaneously harnesses maintenance, adapted creative and disruptive modes of institutional work. Ensuing repair work is primarily directed to the regulatory and normative pillars of the breached institution, though their consequential effects seek to realign the cultural-cognitive pillar. Second, adapted creative and disruptive modes interact to generate elaborative and/or eliminative institutional work. This fosters a dynamic form of institutional maintenance, wherein the breached institution evolves in order to endure within the changing terrain of the field. Finally, our elaboration of field-level institutional repair work offers insight into the relative plasticity of the institution of medicine, and contributes to understanding of the dark side of institutional work.
Aristotle. (1959). The art of rhetoric. London: William Heinemann.
2.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
3.
BitektineA.HaackP. (2015). The ‘macro’ and the ‘micro’ of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40, 49–75.
4.
BjerregaardT.NielsenB. (2014). Institutional maintenance in an international bureaucracy: Everyday practices of international elites inside UNESCO. European Management Journal, 32, 981–990.
5.
BojeD. M.LuhmanJ. T.BaackD. E. (1999). Stories and encounters between storytelling organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8, 340–360.
6.
BoudesT.LarocheH. (2009). Taking off the heat: Narrative sensemaking in post-crisis inquiry reports. Organization Studies, 30, 377–396.
7.
BoyceM. E. (1995). Collective centring and collective sense-making in the stories and storytelling of one organization. Organization Studies, 16, 107–137.
8.
BrownA. D. (2004). Authoritative sensemaking in a public inquiry report. Organization Studies, 25, 95–112.
9.
BrownA. D.JonesM. (2000). Honourable members and dishonourable deeds: Sensemaking, impression management and legitimation in the ‘Arms to Iraq Affair’. Human Relations, 53, 655–689.
10.
BrownA. D.AinsworthS.GrantD. (2012). The rhetoric of institutional change. Organization Studies, 33, 297–321.
11.
ButlerI.DrakefordM. (2005). Scandal, social work and social welfare. Bristol: The Policy Press.
12.
CaronnaC. A. (2004). The misalignment of institutional pillars: Consequences for the U.S. health care field. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 45–58.
13.
ClarkC. E.NewellS. (2013). Masquerading in the U.S. capital markets: The dark side of maintaining an institution. Business and Society Review, 118, 105–134.
14.
CoorenF. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11, 373–393.
15.
CorbettE. P. J. (1999). Classical rhetoric for the modern student. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
CreedD. W. E.HudsonB. A.OkhuysenG. A.Smith-CroweK. (2014). Swimming in a sea of shame: Incorporating emotion into explanations of institutional reproduction and change. Academy of Management Review, 39, 275–301.
17.
CurrieG.LockettA.FinnR.MartinG.WaringJ. (2012). Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33, 937–962.
18.
DacinM. T.MunirK.TraceyP. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge Colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1393–1418.
19.
DavisJ. P.EisenhardtK. M. (2011). Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 159–201.
20.
DesaiV. M. (2011). Mass media and massive failures: Determining organizational efforts to defend field legitimacy following crises. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 263–278.
21.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
22.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.
23.
ElliottD.McGuinnessM. (2002). Public inquiry: Panacea or placebo?Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10, 14–25.
24.
EmpsonL.CleaverI.AllenJ. (2013). Managing partners and management professionals: Institutional work dyads in professional partnerships. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 808–844.
25.
ErkamaN.VaaraE. (2010). Struggles over legitimacy in global organizational restructuring: A rhetorical perspective on legitimation strategies and dynamics in a shutdown case, Organization Studies, 31, 813–839.
26.
FeldmanM. S.SköldbergK.BrownR. N.HornerD. (2004). Making sense of stories: A rhetorical approach to narrative analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 147–170.
27.
FrancisR. (2010). The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry: Independent Inquiry into care provided by Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005 – March 2009 (Volume I). London: The Stationery Office.
28.
FrancisR. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Volumes 1–3). London: The Stationery Office.
29.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
GreenS. E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29, 653–669.
31.
GreenS. E.LiY. (2011). Rhetorical institutionalism: Language, agency, and structure in institutional theory since Alvesson 1993. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1662–1697.
32.
GreenS. E.LiY.NohriaN. (2009). Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 11–36.
33.
GreenwoodR.DíazA M.LiS. X.LorenteJ.C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21, 521–539.
34.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR.HiningsC .R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80.
35.
HarmonD. J.GreenS. E.GoodnightG. T. (2015). A model of rhetorical legitimation: The structure of communication and cognition underlying institutional maintenance and change. Academy of Management Review, 40, 76–95.
36.
HeaphyE. D. (2013). Repairing breaches with rules: Maintaining institutions in the face of everyday disruptions. Organization Science, 24, 1291–1315.
37.
HerepathA.KitchenerM.WaringJ. (2015). A realist analysis of hospital patient safety in Wales: Applied learning from alternative contexts from a multisite case study. Health Services Delivery Research, 3(40), 1–242.
38.
HirschP. M. (1997). Sociology without social structure: Neoinstitutional theory meets brave new world. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1702–1723.
39.
HoffmanA. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–371.
40.
House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (2005). Government by inquiry: First Report of Session 2004–05. London: The Stationery Office Limited.
41.
HoweG. (1999). The management of public inquiries. Political Quarterly, 70, 294–304.
42.
JeppersonR. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalization. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
KennedyI. (2001). Learning From Bristol: The Report of the Public Inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health by Command of Her MajestyJuly2001, CM 5207(I).
44.
KraatzM. S. (2011). Two cheers for institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 59–61.
45.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In: CleggS.HardyC.LawrenceT. B. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: SAGE.
46.
LawrenceT. B.LecaB.ZilberT. B. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34, 1023–1033.
47.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds). (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52–58.
49.
LeachJ. (2000). Rhetorical analysis. In BauerM. W.GaskellG. (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 207–226). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
Liberating the NHS: No decision about me, without me. (2012). London: Department of Health.
51.
LokJ.de RondM. (2013). On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 185–207.
52.
MartíI.FernándezP. (2013). The institutional work of oppression and resistance: Learning from the Holocaust. Organization Studies, 34, 1195–1223.
53.
MicelottaE. R.WashingtonM. (2013). Institutions and maintenance: The repair work of Italian professionals. Organization Studies, 34, 1037–1100.
54.
NilssonW. (2015). Positive institutional work: Exploring institutional work through the lens of positive organizational scholarship. Academy of Management Review, 40, 370–398.
55.
PlemingN. (2005). The Kerr/Haslam Inquiry, Vols 1 and 2. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health by Command of Her Majesty July2005 (Cm 6640–I). London: HMSO.
56.
PowellW. W.ColyvasJ. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: SAGE.
57.
RaaijmakersA .G. M.VermeulenP. A. M.MeeusM. T. H.ZietsmaC. (2015). I need time! Exploring pathways to compliance under institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 85–110.
58.
RamirezC. (2013). ‘We are being pilloried for something we did not even know we had done wrong!’ Quality control and orders of worth in the British audit profession. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 845–869.
59.
ReayT.ChreimS.Golden-BiddleK.GoodrickE.WilliamsB. E.CasebeerA.PabloA.HiningsC. R. (2013). Transforming new ideas into practice: An activity based perspective on the institutionalization of practices. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 963–990.
60.
ReayT.Golden-BiddleK.GermannK.(2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal2006, 49, 977–998.
61.
RedfernM. (2001). The Royal Liverpool Children’s Inquiry. London: The House of Commons.
62.
RhodesC.BrownA. D. (2005). Narrative, organizations and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 167–188.
63.
RitchieJ. (2000). An inquiry into quality and practice within the National Health Service arising from the actions of Rodney Ledward: The report. London: South East Regional Office, Department of Health.
64.
ScottW. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. London: SAGE.
65.
SillinceJ. A. A.BarkerJ. R. (2012). A tropological theory of institutionalization. Organization Studies, 33, 7–38.
66.
SmetsM.JarzabkowskiP. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66, 1279–1309.
67.
SmetsM.MorrisT.GreenwoodR. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 877–904.
68.
SminiaH. (2011). Institutional continuity and the Dutch construction industry fiddle. Organization Studies, 32, 1559–1585.
69.
SmithJ. (2002–). The Shipman Inquiry: Independent Public Inquiry into the issues arising from the case of Harold Frederick Shipman. Chaired by Dame Janet Smith, DBE. Including the following:
70.
SmithJ. (2002). Death disguised;
71.
SmithJ. (2003a). The police investigation of 1998;
72.
SmithJ. (2003b). Death certification and the investigation of deaths by Coroners;
73.
SmithJ. (2004a). The regulation of controlled drugs in the community;
74.
SmithJ. (2004b). Safeguarding patients: Lessons from the past – Proposals for the future;
75.
SmithJ. (2005). Shipman: The final report.
76.
SuddabyR. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14–20.
Sulitzeanu-KenanR. (2010). Reflection in the shadow of blame: When do politicians appoint commissions of inquiry?British Journal of Political Studies, 40, 613–634.
79.
Trust, assurance and safety – The regulation of health professionals in the 21st century. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health by Command of Her Majesty February 2007 (Cm 7013). London: The Stationery Office.
80.
TurnerB. A. (1976). The organizational and interorganizational development of disasters. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 378–397.
81.
VaidyanathanB. (2015). Professional socialization in medicine. American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, 17, 160–166.
82.
WalsheK.HigginsJ. (2002). The use and impact of inquiries in the NHS. British Medical Journal, 325, 895–900.
83.
WarnerJ. (2006). Inquiry reports as active texts and their function in relation to professional practice in mental health. Health, Risk & Society, 8, 223–237.
84.
WeickK. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organisations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.
85.
WicksD. (2001). Institutionalized mindsets of invulnerability: Differentiated institutional fields and the antecedents of organizational crisis. Organization Studies, 22, 659–692.
86.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London: SAGE.
87.
ZietsmaC.LawrenceT. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 189–221.
