This article considers data from a hospital that was introducing an experimental new facility onto an existing site, including the process of institutionalization of the argument ‘The new facility requires radically new working practices.’ The data are used to test a proposed integration of Barley and Tolbert’s (1997) model of the psychological mechanisms involved in institutionalization with a political model of how motives vary during the stages of organizational change. There is some empirical support for a congruence between the two models, namely, that psychological encoding matches with political recognition, psychological enactment matches with political transition, and psychological replication and externalization match with political consolidation.
Argyris, C.Knowledge for action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
3.
Argyris, C. & Schon, D.A.Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1978.
4.
Barley, S.Technology as an occasion for structuring . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 31, 78-108.
5.
Barley, S.R. & Tolbert, P.S.Institutionalization as structuration: Methods and analytic strategies for studying links between action and structure. Paper presented at the Conference on Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Organizational Processes, University of Texas, Austin, 1988.
6.
Barley, S.R. & Tolbert, P.S.Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 1997, 18(1), 93-117.
7.
Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T.The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966.
Brown, A.D. & Jones, M.R.Doomed to failure: Narratives of inevitability and conspiracy in a failed IS project. Organizational Studies, 1998, 19(1), 73-88.
10.
Brown, A.D.Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation . Organizational Studies, 1998, 35(1), 35-58.
11.
Brown, A.D.Managing understandings: Politics, symbolism, niche marketing and the quest for legitimacy in IT implementation . Organization Studies, 1995, 16(6), 951-969.
12.
Bucher, R. & Stelling, J.Four characteristics of professional organizations. In R. Blankership (Ed.), Colleagues in organizations: The social construction of professional work. New York: Wiley, 197.
13.
Callon, M. , Law, J. & Rip, A.How to study the force of science. In M. Callon, J. Law and A. Rip (Eds) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan, 1986.
14.
Cooper, D.J. , Hinings, B., Greenwood, R. & Brown, J.L.Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: The case of Canadian law firms. Organizational Studies, 1996, 17(4), 623-647.
15.
Dawson, P.Organizational change: A processual view. London: Paul Chapman, 1994.
16.
Denis, J.-L. , Langley, A. & Cazale, L.Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity. Organization Studies, 1996, 17(4), 673-699.
17.
Dunphy, D. & Stace, D.Under new management: Australian organizations in transition. Sydney: McGraw-Hill, 1990.
18.
Fine, G.A.Justifying work: Occupational rhetorics as resources in restaurant kitchens . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41, 90-115.
19.
Ford, J.D. & Ford, L.W.The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3), 541-570.
20.
Giddens, A.The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
21.
Goffman, E.The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1959/1994.
22.
Grant, D. , Keenoy, T. & Oswick, C. (Eds) Discourse and organization. London: Sage, 1998.
Lewin, K.Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row, 1951.
25.
Lindkvist, L. , Soderlund, J. & Tell, F.Managing product development projects: On the significance of fountains and deadlines. Organization Studies, 1998, 19(6), 931-951.
26.
Mintzberg, H. & Westley, F.Cycles of organizational change. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13, 39-59.
27.
Montgomery, K. & Oliver, A.L.Responses by professional organizations to multiple and ambiguous institutional environments: The case of AIDS. Organization Studies, 1996, 17(4), 649-671.
28.
Morgan, G.Organizations as political systems. In C. Mabey and B. Mayon-White (Eds), Managing change. London: Paul Chapman, 1993, pp. 21-217.
29.
Nicholson N.Organizational change. In C. Mabey and B. Mayon-White (Eds), Managing change. London: Paul Chapman, 1993, pp. 207-211.
30.
O’Connor, E.S.Paradoxes of participation: Textual analysis and organizational change . Organization Studies, 1995, 16(5), 769-803.
31.
Oliver C.Strategic responses to institutional processes . Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16, 145-179.
32.
Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, M.L.The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.
33.
Pettigrew, A. , Ferlie, E. & McKee, L.Shaping strategic change. Making change in large organizations: The case of the National Health Service. London: Sage, 1992.
34.
Pfeffer, J.Understanding power in organizations. In C. Mabey and B. Mayon-White (Eds), Managing change. London: Paul Chapman, 1993, pp. 201-206.
35.
Reed, M.I.In praise of duality and dualism: Rethinking agency and structure in organizational analysis . Organisation Studies, 1997, 18(1), 21-42.
36.
Schutz, A.The phenomenology of the social world. London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1972.
37.
Schutz, A.On phenomenology and social relations. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1973.
38.
Sillince, J.A.A.Institutionalisation of argumentation in organisational settings . In F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair and C. Willard (Eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, 1998, pp. 736-741.
39.
Sillince J.A.A.The organizational setting, use and institutionalization of argumentation repertoires . Journal of Management Studies, 1999a, 36(6) 795-830.
40.
Sillince, J.A.A.The role of political language forms and language coherence in the organizational change process . Organization Studies, 1999b, 20(3), 485-518.
41.
Smircich, L. & Stubbart, C.Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10(4), 724-736.
42.
Strong, P. & Robinson, J.The NHS: Under new management. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1990.
Tolbert, P. & Zucker, L.G.Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of Civil Service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 30, 22-39.
45.
Van de Ven, H. & Poole, M.S.Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3), 510-540.
46.
Watson, T.J.Rhetoric, discourse and argument in organizational sense making: A reflexive tale . Organization Studies, 1995, 16(5), 805-821.
47.
Weick, K.E.Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage, 1995.
48.
Weisbord, M.R.Productive workplaces: Organizing and managing for dignitiy, meaning and community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1988.
49.
Willihnganz, S.C.Rationality, arguments and ideal types . In F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair and C.A. Willard (Eds), Proceedings of the Second ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. 1B, University of Amsterdam, June 19-22, 1991, pp. 920-928.
50.
Zbaracki, M.J.The rhetoric and reality of Total Quality Management . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43, 602-636.
