By analysing the Fiat case, we contextualize path-dependence processes within the relations of production and propose a neo-Gramscian interpretation of the agency-structure interplay within path-dependent phenomena based on the distinction between structural hegemony and hegemonic projects. Building upon recent developments in understanding institutional complexity, we treat agency as embedded within, yet separated from, self-reinforcements that are generated by multiple competing logics. The aim is to deepen our understanding of the relationship between collective agency and the emergence of meta-routines in the pre-formation phase of the path-dependence process, and their interaction with self-reinforcements in the formation and lock-in phases.
AdlerP. S. (2007). The future of critical management studies: A paleo-Marxist critique of labour process theory. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1313–1345.
2.
AdlerP. S.GoldoftasB.LevineD. L. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68.
3.
AmbroseJ. M.CarrollA. (2007). Medical malpractice reform and insurer claims defence: Unintended effects?Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 32(5), 843–864.
4.
AmatoriF. (1999). Gli uomini del Professore. Strategie, organizzazione e management alla Fiat fra anni Venti e anni Sessanta. In AnnibaldiC.BertaG. (Eds.), Grande Impresa e sviluppo Italiano. Studi per i cento anni della Fiat (pp. 257–342). Bologna, Il Mulino.
5.
ANFIA (2012). The Italian Automotive Industry, 2003–2012. Available at: www.ANFIA.it
6.
Archivio Storico Fiat (1996). Fiat: Le Fasi Della Cresicta. Torino: Paravia.
7.
ArthurW. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99, 116–131.
8.
Becchi CollidàA.NegrelliS. (1986). La transizione nell’industria e nelle relazioni industriali: l’auto ed il caso Fiat. Milan: Franco Angeli.
9.
BeckerM. C. (2004). Organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 643–677.
10.
BertaG. (1998). Conflitto industriale e struttura d’impresa alla Fiat 1919–1979. Bologna, Il Mulino.
11.
BigazziD. (2000). Mirafiori. In ZetleinJ.HerrigelG. (Eds.), Americanisation and its limits: Reworking US technology and management in the post-war Europe and Japan (pp. 163–211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BonazziG.AntonelliC. (2004). To make or to sell? The case of in-house outsourcing at Fiat auto. Organization Studies, 24(4), 574–594.
13.
BrownA. D.AinsworthS.GrantD. (2012). The rhetoric of institutional change. Organization Studies, 33(3), 297–321.
14.
CamuffoA.VolpatoG. (1996). Dynamic capabilities and manufacturing automation: Organisational learning in the Italian automobile industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 813–838.
15.
CastronovoV. (1999). Fiat 1899–1999: Cento anni di storia italiana. Milan: Rizzoli.
16.
CiravegnaL.MaielliG. (2011). Outsourcing of new product development and the opening of innovation in mature industries: A longitudinal study of Fiat during crisis and recovery. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), 69–93.
17.
ContiniG. (1992). The rise and fall of shop-floor bargaining at Fiat 1945–1980. In TollidayS.ZeitlinJ. (Eds.), Between Fordism and flexibility (pp. 144–167). Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
CoriatB.DosiG. (1998). Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: On the coevolution of competences, conflicts and organizational routines. In ChandlerA.HagströmP.SölvellÖ. (Eds.), The dynamic firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
CossuttaD.GrilloM. (1986). Excess capacity, sunk costs and collusion: A non-cooperative bargaining game. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 4, 251–270.
20.
DavidP. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332–337.
21.
DavidP. A. (2001). Path dependence, its critics and the quest for ‘historical economics’. In GarrousteP.IoannidesS. (Eds.), Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas past and present (pp. 15–40). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
22.
DelbridgeR. (2007). Explaining conflicted collaboration: A critical realist approach to hegemony. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1347–1357.
23.
DelbridgeR.EdwardsT. (2013). Inhabiting institutions: Critical realists refinements to understanding institutional complexity and change. Organization Studies, 34(7), 927–947.
24.
DosiG.FailloM.MarengoL. (2008). Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: An introduction. Organization Studies, 29, 1165–1185.
25.
EnriettiA.FornengoG. (1989). Il Gruppo Fiat dagli inizi degli anni 80 alla prospettiva del mercato unificato dle 1992. Firenze: La nuova Italia scientifica.
26.
FroudJ.HaslamC. J.JohalS.WilliamsK. (2002). Cars after financialization: A case study in financial underperformance, constraints and consequences. Competition and Change, 6(1), 13–41.
27.
GennaroP.ScifoG. (1997). Parabole di imprenditori ed imprese in cinquant’anni di sviluppo italiano. Milano: Franco Angeli.
28.
GarudR.KumaraswamyA.KarnøeP. (2010). Path dependence or path creation?Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 760–774.
29.
GiacosaD. (1988). Progetti alla Fiat prima del computer. Milano: Automobilia.
30.
GramsciA. (1977). Selection from political writings (1910–1920), Ed. HoareQ.London: Lawrence and Wishart.
31.
GramsciA. (2007). Selection from the prison notebooks, Ed. HoareQ.London: Lawrence and Wishart.
32.
GreggioR. (2003). Fiat una crise automobile. Croissance externe et management de marque. Paris: Les Edision de l’Officine.
33.
HendersonR.ClarkK. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9–30.
34.
HolwegM.PilK. F. (2009). A break from the past: Volvo and its malcontents. In FreyssenetM. (Ed.), The second automobile revolution (pp. 309–331). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
HossainT.MorganJ. (2009). The quest for QWERTY. The American Economy Review, 99(2), 435–440.
36.
JacksonJ. E.KollmanK. (2010). A formulation of path dependence with an empirical example. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 5, 257–289
37.
JacksonJ. E.KollmanK. (2012). Modelling, measuring, and distinguishing path dependence, outcome dependence, and outcome independence. Political Analysis, 20, 157−174.
38.
JosephJ. (2000). A realist theory of hegemony. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(2), 179–202.
39.
JosephJ. (2002), Hegemony: A realist analysis. London: Routledge.
40.
KochJ. (2011). Inscribed strategies: Exploring the organizational nature of strategic lock-in. Organization Studies, 32(3), 337–363.
41.
LaclauE.MouffeS. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
42.
LevyD. L.EganD. (2003). A neo Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiation. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 804–830.
43.
LevyD. L.SkullyM. (2007). The institutional entrepreneur as Modern Prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28, 971–991.
44.
LlewellynS. (2007). Introducing the agents. Organization Studies, 28(2), 133–153.
45.
LiebowitzS. J.MargolisS. E. (1990). The fable of the keys. Journal of Law and Economics, 33, 1–25.
46.
LiebowitzS. J.MargolisS. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. The Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1), 205–226.
47.
MahoneyJ. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29, 507–548.
48.
MaielliG. (2005a). Spot-welding technology and the development of robotics at Fiat, 1972–1987. A case of production management discontinuity?Business History, 47(1), 102–121.
49.
MaielliG. (2005b). The machine that never changed: Intangible specialisation and output-mix optimisation at Fiat, 1960s–1990s. Competition and Change, 9(3), 249–276.
50.
MaielliG., (2015, forthcoming). “Path-dependent product development and Fiat’s takeover of Lancia in 1969: Meta-routines for design selection between synergies and brand autonomy”. Business History.
51.
MaxwellK. (2007). Fiat may run short of fuel. New model pipeline to go dry until 2009. Mini car mini profit?Wall Street Journal, April, 30.
52.
MilanaccioA.RicofiL. (1976). Lotte operaie e ambiente di lavoro. Mirafiori 1968–1974. Torino: Enaudi.
53.
MosconiA.RullaniE. (1978). Il Gruppo nello sviluppo dell’impresa industruale. Milano: ISEDI.
54.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
PageS. E. (2006). Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 87–115.
56.
ReedsM. I. (2012). Masters of the universe: Power and elites in organization studies. Organization Studies, 33(2), 203–221.
57.
RamseyM.Gay FordenS. (2009). Fiat forms sixth-largest carmaker on Chrysler assets. Bloomberg, June, 10.
58.
SchreyöggG.SydowJ. (2011). Organizational path dependence: A process view. Organization Studies, 32(3), 321–335.
59.
SilvaF.GrilloM.PratiM. (1981). Il mercato italiano del’auto nel contesto europeo. Milano: Il Mulino.
60.
SydowJ.WindelerA.SchubertC.MӧlleringG. (2012). Organizing R&D consortia for path creation and extension: The case of semiconductor manufacturing technologies. Organization Studies, 33(7), 907–936.
61.
SydowJ.SchreyöggG.KochJ. (2009). Organizational path-dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709.
62.
TeeceD. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The microfoundation of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–553.
ThorntonP. H.OccasioW.LounsburyM. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
TripsasM.GavettiG. (2000). Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 1(10/11), 1147–1161.
66.
Van DrielH.DolfsmaW. (2009). Path dependence, initial conditions, and routines in organizations: The Toyota production system re-examined. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(1), 49–72.
67.
VergneJ. P.DurandR. (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 737–759.
68.
VergneJ.DurandR. (2011). The path of most persistence: An evolutionary perspective on path dependence and dynamic capabilities. Organization Studies, 32(3), 365–382.
69.
VolpatoG. (1996). Il caso Fiat. Una strategia di riorganizzazione e di rilancio. Torino: Enaudi.
70.
WittnebenB. F.OkerekeC.BanerjeeS. B.LevyL. L. (2012). Climate change and the emergence of new organizational landscapes. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1431–1450.
