The conventional negative understanding of the scientific management movement has been challenged in recent decades by heterodox scholars who hold that the movement supported the democratization of the management process and in so doing worked closely with unions and with progressives within and around Roosevelt’s New Deal administration. This paper seeks to strengthen this challenge to orthodoxy by documenting how the leadership of the Taylor Society, a body established by Frederick Taylor’s inner circle as a vehicle to develop and promote their mentor’s ideas, strove to internationalize the diffusion of participatory management in tandem with the International Labour Organization, a body whose core purpose was and is to promote codetermination both in workplaces and in wider society.
AdlerP. (2007). The future of critical management studies: A paleo-marxist critique of labour process theory. Organization Studies, 28, 1313–1345.
2.
AlchonG. (1991). Mary van Kleeck and social-economic planning. Journal of Policy History, 3, 1–23.
3.
Anon. (1936). Comment. Society for the Advancement of Management, 1, 2.
4.
BeissingerM. R. (1988). Scientific management, socialist discipline and Soviet power. London: Tauris.
5.
BerghahnV. R. (1996). The United States and the shaping of West Germany’s social compact, 1945–1966. International Labor and Working-Class History, 50, 125–132.
6.
BloemenE. (1996). The movement for scientific management in Europe between the Wars. In SpenderJ. C.KijneH. J. (Eds.), Scientific management: Frederick Winslow Taylor’s gift to the world (pp. 111–131). Boston: Kluwer.
7.
BrandeisL. (1912). Forward. In Frank B. Gilbreth, Primer of Scientific Management (pp. vii–viii). New York: Van Nostrand.
8.
BreenW. J. (2002). Social science and state policy in World War II. Human relations, pedagogy, and industrial training, 1940–1945. Business History Review, 76, 233–266.
9.
BruceK. (2000). Conflict and conversion: Henry S. Dennison and the shaping of J. K. Galbraith’s economic thought. Journal of Economic Issues, 34, 949–967.
10.
BruceK. (2006). Activist management: Henry S. Dennison’s institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 40, 1113–1137.
11.
BruceK.NylandC. (2011). Elton Mayo and the deification of human relations. Organization Studies, 32, 383–405.
12.
CallenderG. (2009). Efficiency and management. Abingdon: Routledge.
13.
CayetT. (2010). Rationaliser le Travail? Le BIT et la modernisation économique durant l’entre-deux-guerres. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
14.
CayetT. (2012). The ILO and the IMI: A strategy of influence on the edges of the League of Nations, 1925–1934. In van DaeleJ.GarciaM.van GoethemG.van der LinM. (Eds.), ILO Histories: Essays on the International Labour Organization and its impact on the world during the twentieth century (pp 251–282). Bern: Peter Lang Press.
CookeM. L. (1939). Preparedness plus: Democracy knocks at industry’s door. American Federationist, 46, 136–142.
17.
CookeM. L.MurrayP. (1940). Organized labor and production: Next steps in industrial democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
18.
DaleE. (1949). Greater productivity through labor–management cooperation. New York: American Management Association.
19.
de CockC.CutcherL.GrantD. (2012). Finance capitalism’s perpetually extinguished pasts: Exploring discursive shifts 2007–2911. Culture and Organization, 18, 87–90.
20.
DeckerS. (2013). The silence of the archives: Business history, post-colonialism and archival ethnography. Management and Organization History, 8, 155–173.
21.
DennisonH.DuttonP.KendallH. P.PersonH. (1939). History of scientific management in America. Mechanical Engineering, 61, 671–675.
22.
DevinatP. (1926). The American Labor movement and scientific management. International Labour Review, 13, 461–488.
23.
DevinatP. (1927). Scientific management in Europe. Geneva: ILO Studies and Reports, Series B.
24.
FisherN. I. (2009). Homer Sarasohn and American involvement in the evolution of quality management in Japan, 1945–1950. International Statistical Review, 77, 276–299.
25.
Fones-WolfE. (1994). Selling free enterprise: The business assault on labor and liberalism, 1945–1960. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
26.
FraserS. (1993). Labor will rule: Sidney Hillman and the rise of American Labor. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
FussH. (1928). Rationalisation and Unemployment. International Labour Review, 17, 802–817.
28.
GalbraithJ. K. (1981). A life in our times. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
29.
GreenwaldR. A. (2005). The Triangle fire, the protocols of peace, and industrial democracy in progressive era New York. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
GuzdaH. P. (1984), Industrial democracy: Made in the U.S.A. Monthly Labor Review, 107, 26–33.
31.
GodelierE. (2009a). History, a useful “science” for management? From polemics to controversies. Enterprise and Society, 10, 831–836.
32.
GodelierE. (2009b). Comments on comments, or the richness of dialogue. Enterprise and Society, 10, 837–846.
33.
GuillenM. (1994). Models of management: Work, authority and organization in a comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
HaanH. (1933). Scientific management and planning. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 166, 66–74.
35.
HarrisH. J. (1982). The right to manage: Industrial relations policies of American business in the 1940s. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
36.
HawleyE. (1974). Herbert Hoover, the Commerce secretariat, and the vision of an ‘associative state’, 1921–1928. Journal of American History, 6, 116–140.
37.
International Labour Organization (1921). The first year of the International Labour Organization. International Labour Review, 1, 23–40.
38.
International Labour Organization (1922a). The three-shift system in the iron and steel industry. International Labour Review, 6, 547–558.
39.
International Labour Organization (1922b). Application of the three-shift system to the iron and steel industry. Studies and Reports, Vol. Series D, no. 3, 356–368.
40.
International Labour Organization (1938). Historical survey of the contributions of the International Labour Organization to the study of management. Geneva: ILO.
41.
JacobyS. M. (1983). Union–management cooperation in the United States: Lessons from the 1920s. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37, 18–33.
42.
JacobyS. M. (1985). Union–management cooperation in the United States during the Second World War. In DubofskyM. (Ed.), Technological change and workers’ movements (pp. 100–129). Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.
43.
KhuranaR. (2007). From higher aims to higher hands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
KrainesO. (1960). Brandeis’ philosophy of scientific management. Western Political Quarterly, 13, 191–201.
45.
KuhnT. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
LaytonE. T. (1971). The revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American engineering profession. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University Press.
47.
LeeJ. (2004). Defense workers’ struggles for patriotic control: The labor–management–state contests over defense production at Brewster, 1940–1944. International Labor and Working-Class History, 66, 136–154.
48.
McCartinJ. A. (1997). Labor’s Great War: The struggle for industrial democracy and the origins of modern American labor relations, 1912–21. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
49.
McKelveyJ. T. (1952). AFL attitudes toward production, 1900–1932. Cornell Studies in Industrial and Labor Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
50.
McGrathW. L. (1953). Problems existing in the ILO. Advanced Management, 18, 9–12, 28–29.
51.
MagatR. (1999). Unlikely partners: Philanthropic foundations and the labor movement. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52.
MaierC. S. (1970). Between Taylorism and technocracy: European ideologies and the vision of industrial productivity in the 1920s. Journal of Contemporary History, 5, 27–61.
53.
MayoE. (1935). The blind spot in scientific management. In Sixth International Congress for Scientific Management, 3, 214–218. London: P. S. King.
54.
MerkleJ. (1980). Management and ideology: The legacy of the international scientific management movement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
MorganG.FroudJ.QuackS.SchneibergM. (2011). Capitalism in crisis: Organizational perspectives. Organization, 18, 47–52.
56.
MorganS. L. (2006). Transfer of Taylorist ideas to China, 1910–1930s. Journal of Management History, 12, 408–424.
57.
MoynihanD. P. (1960). The United States and the International Labor Organization, 1889–1934. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Tufts University.
58.
NadwornyM. (1955). Scientific management and the unions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
NylandC. (1989). Reduced worktime and the management of production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
NylandC. (1995). Taylorism and hours of work. Journal of Management History, 1, 8–25.
61.
NylandC. (1998). Taylorism and the mutual gains strategy. Industrial Relations, 37, 519–542.
62.
NylandC. (2000). A contemporary account of scientific management as applied to women’s work with a comment by Frederick W. Taylor. Journal of Management History, 6, 248–271.
63.
NylandC.BruceK. (2012). The demonization of scientific management and the deification of human relations. In LichtensteinN.ShermerE. (Eds.) The American Right and Labor: Politics, ideology, and imagination (pp. 50–84). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
64.
NylandC.HeenanT. (2005). Mary van Kleeck, Taylorism and the control of knowledge. Management Decision, 43, 1358–1374.
65.
NylandC.McLeodA. (2007). The scientific management of the consumer interest. Business History, 49, 717–735.
66.
NylandC.RixM. (2000). Mary van Kleeck, Lillian Gilbreth and the Women’s Bureau study of gendered labor law. Journal of Management History, 6, 306–322.
67.
PersonH. (1917). The manager, the workman, and the social scientist. Bulletin of the Taylor Society, 3, 1–7.
68.
PersonH. (1927). Scientific management and the cartels. Bulletin of the Taylor Society, 12, 391–393.
69.
PersonH. (1931). The new challenge to scientific management: Can the principles of planning and control be applied over a wider area than the individual enterprise?Bulletin of the Taylor Society, 16, 62–63.
70.
Phillips-FeinK. (2006). Top-down revolution: Businessmen, intellectuals and politicians against the New Deal 1945–1964. Enterprise and Society, 74, 686–694.
71.
Phillips-FeinK. (2009). Invisible hands: The making of the conservative movement from the New Deal to Reagan. New York: W. W. Norton.
RowlinsonM.HassardJ. (2013). Historical institutionalism or neo-institutionalist history? A critique of historical research in management and organization studies. Management and Organization History, 8, 111–126.
74.
SahlmanW. A. (2009). Management and the financial crisis (We have met the enemy and he is us…). Harvard Business School, Working Paper 10–033.
75.
SavinoD. (2009). Louis D. Brandeis and his role promoting scientific management as a progressive movement. Journal of Management History, 15, 38–49.
76.
SchachterH. L. (1989). Frederick Taylor and the public administration community. Albany: State Library of New York.
77.
SchreckerE. (1986). No ivory tower: McCarthyism and the universities. New York: Oxford University Press.
78.
SchreckerE. (2010). The lost soul of higher education: Corporatization, the assault on academic freedom, and the end of the American university. New York: New Press.
79.
SiegelI. H.WeinbergE. (1982). Labor–management cooperation: The American experience. Kalamazoo: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
80.
StorrsL. R. (2000). Civilizing capitalism: The National Consumers’ League, women’s activism, and labor standards in the New Deal era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
81.
TaylorF. W. (1914). Scientific management and labor unions. Bulletin of the Society to Promote the Science of Management, 1, 3.
82.
TaylorF. W. (1916). Testimony of Mr. Frederick W. Taylor. Final Report and Testimony Submitted to Congress by The Commission on Industrial Relations, 1. Washington, DC.
83.
Taylor Society (1929). Membership list. New York.
84.
ThomasA. (1920). The task of the International Labor Office. In SolanoE. J. (Ed.), Labor as an international problem (pp. 34–50). London: Macmillan & Co.
85.
ThomasA. (1921). The International Labour Organization: Its origins, developments and future. International Labour Review, 1, 1–20.
86.
ThomasA. (1926a). The eight-hour day: Taking a reckoning. International Labour Review, 14, 153–174.
87.
ThomasA. (1926b). Scientific management of industry: Address to the 33rd Session of the Government Body of the International Labor Office. International Management Institute Archives.
88.
ThomasA. (1931). Report of the Director. Geneva: International Labour Conference.
89.
ThomasA. (1932). Report of the Director. Geneva: International Labour Conference.
90.
ThompsonS. E. (1933). The influence of scientific management. Bulletin of the Taylor Society, 18, 22–25.
91.
TrombleyK. (1954). The life and times of a happy liberal: A biography of Morris Llewellyn Cooke. New York: Harper.
92.
TsutsuiW. M. (1998). Manufacturing ideology: Scientific management in twentieth century Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
93.
UrwickL. (1929a). The meaning of rationalisation. London: Nisbet & Co.
94.
UrwickL. (1929b). The significance of rationalization. Harvard Business Review, 7, 170–174.
95.
UrwickL. (1931). The views of a representative of an international management organisation. Bulletin of the Taylor Society, 16, 152–159.
96.
UrwickL. (1933). Management of tomorrow. London: Nisbet & Co.
97.
van KleeckM. (1931). Statement at Final Session of Congress. In FledderusM. L. (Ed.), World social economic planning: The necessity for planned adjustment of productive capacity and standards of living (pp. 568–592). The Hague: SAGE Publications.
98.
Walter-BuschE. (2006). Albert Thomas and scientific management in war and peace 1914–1932. Journal of Management History, 12, 212–231.
99.
WarnerM. (1994). Japanese culture, Western management: Taylorism and human resources in Japan. Organization Studies, 15, 509–533.
100.
WeickK. E. (1996). Drop your tools: An allegory for organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 301–313.
101.
WoodR. C. (1989). A lesson learned and a lesson forgotten. Forbes Magazine. February6, 70–78.
102.
WrenD. A. (1980). Scientific management in the U.S.S.R., with particular reference to the contribution of Walter N. Polakov. Academy of Management Review, 5, 1–11.
103.
WrightC. (1993). Taylorism reconsidered: The impact of scientific management within the Australian workplace. Labour History, 64, 34–53.
