Statistics and stories are often equated with different types of knowledge in contemporary western societies: statistics are associated more with the authority of objective, disinterested experts while stories are able to encapsulate subjective, personal experience. In this paper, we explore how both genres were used to produce knowledge in the context of a public inquiry on the problems facing older workers in securing and maintaining employment. Drawing on the concept of power/knowledge relations we examine how statistics and stories were used in different inquiry texts and trace their use across texts over time. Our findings show that to establish their authority as a valid form of knowledge representing the subject of inquiry, statistics and stories both had to be embedded in the appropriate discursive conventions. In the case of statistics, knowledge had to be expressed through discursive conventions that conveyed distance from the subject of inquiry, i.e. independent, objective research. In contrast, stories produced knowledge through discursive conventions that established proximity to the older worker – by being or knowing an older worker. The study shows the effects of these discursive conventions on how knowledge is institutionalized through processes of textual re-inscription, as well as the way in which they constructed a marginalized older worker subject.
Age Counts (2000). An inquiry into issues specific to mature age workers. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Workplace Relations. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
2.
AinsworthS.HardyC. (2008). The enterprising self: An unsuitable job for an older worker. Organization, 15, 389–405.
3.
AinsworthS.HardyC. (2009). Mind over body: Physical and psychotherapeutic discourses and the regulation of the older worker. Human Relations, 62, 1199–1229.
4.
AitkenM. (2009). Wind power planning controversies and the construction of ‘expert’ and ‘lay’ knowledges. Science and Culture, 18, 47–64.
5.
AlvessonM. (2001). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations, 54, 863–886.
6.
BachrachP.BaratzM.S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947–952.
7.
BartelC. A.GarudR. (2003). Narrative knowledge in action: Adaptive abduction as a mechanism for knowledge creation and exchange in organizations. In Easterby-SmithM.LylesM. A. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 324–342). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
8.
BerryG. R. (2001). Telling stories: Making sense of the environmental behavior of chemical firms. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 58–73.
9.
BoudesT.LarocheH. (2009). Taking off the heat: Narrative sensemaking in post-crisis inquiry reports. Organization Studies, 30, 377–396.
10.
BreuerF.RothW.M. (2003). Subjectivity and reflexivity in the social sciences: Epistemic windows and methodical consequences. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4, 184–194.
11.
BrownA. D. (2000). Making sense of inquiry sensemaking. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 45–75.
12.
BrownA. D. (2004). Authoritative sensemaking in a public inquiry report. Organization Studies, 25, 95–112.
13.
BrownA. D.AinsworthS.GrantD. (2012) The rhetoric of institutional change. Organization Studies, 33, 297–321.
14.
BrownA. D.JonesM. (2000). Honorable members and dishonorable deeds: Sensemaking, impression management, and legitimation in the Arms to Iraq Affair. Human Relations, 53, 655–689.
15.
BrownA. D.StaceyP.NandhakumarJ. (2008). Making sense of sensemaking narratives. Human Relations, 61, 1035–1062.
16.
CarlonD. M.DownsA. A.Wert-GrayS. (2006). Statistics as fetishes: The case of financial performance measures and executive compensation. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 475–490.
17.
CharonR. (2004). The ethicality of narrative medicine. In HurwitzB.GreenhalghR.SkultansV. (Eds.), Narrative research in health and illness (pp. 23–36). Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
Cline CohenP. (1982). A calculating people: the spread of numeracy in early America. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
19.
CurrieG.BrownA.D. (2003). A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in a UK hospital. Human Relations, 56, 563–586.
20.
CzarniawskaB. (1997). Narrating the organization: dramas of institutional identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
DastonL. (1992). Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science, 22, 597–618.
22.
DeetzS. (1992). Disciplinary power in the modern corporation. In AlvessonM.WillmottH. (Eds.), Critical management studies (pp. 21–45). London: SAGE.
23.
DenisJ. L.LangleyA.RouleauL. (2006). The power of numbers in strategizing. Strategic Organization, 4, 349–377.
24.
DreyfusH. L.RabinowP. (1982). Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.
25.
EwensteinB.WhyteJ. (2009). Knowledge practices in design: the role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects’. Organization Studies, 30, 7–30.
26.
FentonC.LangleyA. (2011). Strategy as practice and the narrative turn. Organization Studies, 32, 1171–1196.
27.
FoucaultM. (1979). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
28.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. GordonC. (Ed.), Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.
29.
FoxS. (1992). What are we? The constitution of management in higher education. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22, 71–93.
30.
GabrielY. (2004). The voice of experience and the voice of the expert: Can they speak to each other? In HurwitzB.GreenhalghT.SkultansV. (Eds.), Narrative research in health and illness (pp. 168–186). Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
GephartR. P. (1993). The textual approach: Risk and blame in disaster sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1465–1514.
32.
GephartR. P. (2006). Ethnostatistics and organizational research methodologies: An introduction. Organization Research Methods, 9, 417–431.
33.
GergenK. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
GilbertG. N.MulkayM. J. (1984). Opening Pandora’s box: a sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HardyC.Leiba-O’SullivanS. (1998). The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice. Human Relations, 51, 451–483.
36.
HardyC.PhillipsN. (1999). No joking matter: Discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system. Organization Studies, 20, 1–24.
37.
Hernstein SmithB. (1981). Narrative versions, narrative theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Knorr-CetinaK.D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
39.
KulaW. (1986). Measures and men. Trans. SzreterR. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
LanzaraG. F.PatriottaG. (2001). Technology and the courtroom: An inquiry into knowledge making in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 943–971.
41.
LanzaraG. F.PatriottaG. (2007). The institutionalization of knowledge in an automotive factory: Templates, inscriptions, and the problem of durability. Organization Studies, 28, 635–660.
LieblichA.Tuval-MashiachR.ZilberT. (1998). Narrative research: reading, analysis and interpretation. London: SAGE.
44.
LukesS. (1974). Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan.
45.
McGivernG.DopsonS. (2010). Inter-epistemic power and transforming knowledge objects in a biomedical network. Organization Studies, 31, 1667–1686.
46.
MarshallN.RollinsonJ. (2004). Maybe Bacon had a point: The politics of interpretation in collective sensemaking. British Journal of Management, 15(S1): S71–S86.
47.
MercerD. (2002). Scientific method discourses in the construction of ‘EMF Science’: Interests, resources and rhetoric in submissions to a public inquiry. Social Studies of Science, 32, 205–233.
NewmanT. B. (2004). The power of stories over statistics: Lessons from neonatal jaundice and infant airplane safety. In HurwitzB.GreenhalghT.SkultansV. (Eds.), Narrative research in health and illness (pp. 257–275). Oxford: Blackwell.
50.
NonakaI. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69, 96–104.
51.
OrrJ. E. (2006). Ten years of talking about machines. Organization Studies, 27, 1805–1820.
52.
PettigrewA. M. (1973). The politics of organizational decision-making. London: Tavistock.
53.
PettigrewA. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 570–581.
54.
PhillipsN. (1995). Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies, 16, 625–649.
55.
PooveyM. (1993). Figures of arithmetic, figures of speech: The discourse of statistics in the 1830s. Critical Inquiry, 19, 256–276.
56.
PorterT. M. (1991). Objectivity and authority: How French engineers reduced public utility to numbers. Poetics Today, 12, 245–265.
57.
PorterT. M. (1992). Objectivity as standardization: The rhetoric of impersonality in measurement, statistics and cost-benefit analysis. Annals of Scholarship, 9: 19–59.
58.
PorterT. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
RobsonK. (1992). Accounting numbers as ‘inscription’: Action at a distance and the development of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 685–708.
60.
RoseN. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22, 283–299.
61.
SkålénP.FellessonM.FougèreM. (2006). The governmentality of marketing discourse. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22, 275–291.
62.
SchultzeU. (2000). A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly, 24, 3–41.
63.
SpicerA. (2005). The political process of inscribing a new technology. Human Relations, 58, 567–590.
64.
TaylorW. C. (1835). Objects and advantages of statistical science, review of Sur l’homme et le developpement de ses facultés, ou essai de physique sociale, by Adolphe Quételet, Foreign Quarterly Review, 16: 205–207.
65.
TopalC. (2009). The construction of general public interest: Risk, legitimacy, and power in a public hearing. Organization Studies, 30, 277–300.
66.
TownleyB. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18, 518–545.
67.
TsoukasH.HatchM. J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54, 979–1013.
68.
TsoukasH.MylonopoulosN. (2004). Introduction: Knowledge construction and creation in organizations. British Journal of Management, 15: S1–S8.
69.
WoolfS. (1989). The reasonable state: Statistics and the modern state. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31, 588–604.
70.
ZuckerL. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.
